Exploring the Utility of Background and Cognitive Variables in Explaining Latent Differential Item Functioning: An Example of the PISA 2009 Reading Assessment

Differential item functioning (DIF) may be caused by an interaction of multiple manifest grouping variables or unexplored manifest variables, which cannot be detected by conventional DIF detection methods that are based on a single manifest grouping variable. Such DIF may be detected by a latent approach using the mixture item response theory model and subsequently explained by multiple manifest variables. This study facilitates the interpretation of latent DIF with the use of background and cognitive variables. The PISA 2009 reading assessment and student survey are analyzed. Results show that members in manifest groups were not homogenously advantaged or disadvantaged and that a single manifest grouping variable did not suffice to be a proxy of latent DIF. This study also demonstrates that DIF items arising from the interaction of multiple variables can be effectively screened by the latent DIF analysis approach. Background and cognitive variables jointly well predicted latent class membership.     

The Use of Loglinear Models for Assessing Differential Item Functioning Across Manifest and Latent Examinee Groups

Loglinear latent class models are used to detect differential item functioning (DIF). These models are formulated in such a manner that the attribute to be assessed may be continuous, as in a Rasch model, or categorical, as in Latent Class Mastery models. Further, an item may exhibit DIF with respect to a manifest grouping variable, a latent grouping variable, or both. Likelihood-ratio tests for assessing the presence of various types of DIF are described, and these methods are illustrated through the analysis of a "real world" data set.     

Robustness Conditions for MIIV-2SLS When the Latent Variable or Measurement Model is Structurally Misspecified

Most researchers acknowledge that virtually all structural equation models (SEMs) are approximations due to violating distributional assumptions and structural misspecifications. There is a large literature on the unmet distributional assumptions, but much less on structural misspecifications. In this paper, we examine the robustness to structural misspecification of the model implied instrumental variable, two-stage least square (MIIV-2SLS) estimator of SEMs. We introduce two types of robustness: robust-unchanged and robust-consistent. We develop new robustness analytic conditions for MIIV-2SLS and illustrate these with hypothetical models, simulated data, and an empirical example. Our conditions enable a researcher to know whether, for example, a structural misspecification in the latent variable model influences the MIIV-2SLS estimator for measurement model equations and vice versa. Similarly, we establish robustness conditions for correlated errors. The new robustness conditions provide guidance on the types of structural misspecifications that affect parameter estimates and they assist in diagnosing the source of detected problems with MIIVs.     

Using Latent Class Analysis to Set Academic Performance Standards

This study investigated using latent class analysis to set performance standards for assessments comprised of multiple-choice and performance assessment items. Employing this procedure, it is possible to use a sample of student responses to accomplish four goals: (a) determine how well a specified latent structure fits student performance data; (b) determine which latent structure best represents the relationships in the data; (c) obtain estimates of item parameters for each latent class; and (d) identify to which class within that latent structure each response pattern most likely belongs. Comparisons with the Angoff and profile rating methods revealed that the approaches agreed with each other quite well, indicating that both empirical and test-based judgmental approaches may be used for setting performance standards for student achievement.     

Comparison of Factor Simplicity Indices for Dichotomous Data: DETECT R,Bentler's Simplicity Index,and the Loading Simplicity Index

A primary assumption underlying several of the common methods for modeling item response data is unidimensionality, that is, test items tap into only one latent trait. This assumption can be assessed several ways, using nonlinear factor analysis and DETECT, a method based on the item conditional covariances. When multidimensionality is identified, a question of interest concerns the degree to which individual items are related to the latent traits. In cases where an item response is primarily associated with one of these traits it is said that (approximate) simple structure exists, whereas when the item response is related to both traits, the structure is complex. This study investigated the performance of three indices designed to assess the underlying structure present in item response data, two of which are based on factor analysis and one on DETECT. Results of the Monte Carlo simulations show that none of the indices works uniformly well in identifying the structure underlying item responses, although the DETECT r-ratio might be promising in differentiating between approximate simple and complex structures under certain circumstances.     

An NCME Instructional Module on Latent DIF Analysis Using Mixture Item Response Models

The purpose of this ITEMS module is to provide an introduction to differential item functioning (DIF) analysis using mixture item response models. The mixture item response models for DIF analysis involve comparing item profiles across latent groups, instead of manifest groups. First, an overview of DIF analysis based on latent groups, called latent DIF analysis, is provided and its applications in the literature are surveyed. Then, the methodological issues pertaining to latent DIF analysis are described, including mixture item response models, parameter estimation, and latent DIF detection methods. Finally, recommended steps for latent DIF analysis are illustrated using empirical data.     

Item Response Models for Multiple Attempts With Incomplete Data

Allowance for multiple chances to answer constructed response questions is a prevalent feature in computer‐based homework and exams. We consider the use of item response theory in the estimation of item characteristics and student ability when multiple attempts are allowed but no explicit penalty is deducted for extra tries. This is common practice in online formative assessments, where the number of attempts is often unlimited. In these environments, some students may not always answer‐until‐correct, but may rather terminate a response process after one or more incorrect tries. We contrast the cases of graded and sequential item response models, both unidimensional models which do not explicitly account for factors other than ability. These approaches differ not only in terms of log‐odds assumptions but, importantly, in terms of handling incomplete data. We explore the consequences of model misspecification through a simulation study and with four online homework data sets. Our results suggest that model selection is insensitive for complete data, but quite sensitive to whether missing responses are regarded as informative (of inability) or not (e.g., missing at random). Under realistic conditions, a sequential model with similar parametric degrees of freedom to a graded model can account for more response patterns and outperforms the latter in terms of model fit.     

The Best of Both Worlds: Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data Using Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modeling

Both structural equation modeling (SEM) and item response theory (IRT) can be used for factor analysis of dichotomous item responses. In this case, the measurement models of both approaches are formally equivalent. They were refined within and across different disciplines, and make complementary contributions to central measurement problems encountered in almost all empirical social science research fields. In this article (a) fundamental formal similiarities between IRT and SEM models are pointed out. It will be demonstrated how both types of models can be used in combination to analyze (b) the dimensional structure and (c) the measurement invariance of survey item responses. All analyses are conducted with Mplus, which allows an integrated application of both approaches in a unified, general latent variable modeling framework. The aim is to promote a diffusion of useful measurement techniques and skills from different disciplines into empirical social research.     

Models of Decisionmaking Processes for Multiple-Choice Test Items: An Analysis of Spatial Ability

Latent class models of decisionmaking processes related to multiple-choice test items are extremely important and useful in mental test theory. However, building realistic models or studying the robustness of existing models is very difficult. One problem is that there are a limited number of empirical studies that address this issue. The purpose of this paper is to describe and illustrate how latent class models, in conjunction with the answer-until-correct format, can be used to examine the strategies used by examinees for a specific type of task. In particular, suppose an examinee responds to a multiple-choice test item designed to measure spatial ability, and the examinee gets the item wrong. This paper empirically investigates various latent class models of the strategies that might be used to arrive at an incorrect response. The simplest model is a random guessing model, but the results reported here strongly suggest that this model is unsatisfactory. Models for the second attempt of an item, under an answer-until-correct scoring procedure, are proposed and found to give a good fit to data in most situations. Some results on strategies used to arrive at the first choice are also discussed     

A Didactic Explanation of Item Bias, Item Impact, and Item Validity From a Multidimensional Perspective

Many researchers have suggested that the main cause of item bias is the misspecification of the latent ability space, where items that measure multiple abilities are scored as though they are measuring a single ability. If two different groups of examinees have different underlying multidimensional ability distributions and the test items are capable of discriminating among levels of abilities on these multiple dimensions, then any unidimensional scoring scheme has the potential to produce item bias. It is the purpose of this article to provide the testing practitioner with insight about the difference between item bias and item impact and how they relate to item validity. These concepts will be explained from a multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) perspective. Two detection procedures, the Mantel-Haenszel (as modified by Holland and Thayer, 1988) and Shealy and Stout's Simultaneous Item Bias (SIB; 1991) strategies, will be used to illustrate how practitioners can detect item bias.     

Accounting for Rater Effects With the Hierarchical Rater Model Framework When Scoring Simple Structured Constructed Response Tests

Many large‐scale assessments are designed to yield two or more scores for an individual by administering multiple sections measuring different but related skills. Multidimensional tests, or more specifically, simple structured tests, such as these rely on multiple multiple‐choice and/or constructed responses sections of items to generate multiple scores. In the current article, we propose an extension of the hierarchical rater model (HRM) to be applied with simple structured tests with constructed response items. In addition to modeling the appropriate trait structure, the multidimensional HRM (M‐HRM) presented here also accounts for rater severity bias and rater variability or inconsistency. We introduce the model formulation, test parameter recovery with a focus on latent traits, and compare the M‐HRM to other scoring approaches (unidimensional HRMs and a traditional multidimensional item response theory model) using simulated and empirical data. Results show more precise scores under the M‐HRM, with a major improvement in scores when incorporating rater effects versus ignoring them in the traditional multidimensional item response theory model.     

Item Response Theory Models for Performance Decline During Testing

Sometimes, test‐takers may not be able to attempt all items to the best of their ability (with full effort) due to personal factors (e.g., low motivation) or testing conditions (e.g., time limit), resulting in poor performances on certain items, especially those located toward the end of a test. Standard item response theory (IRT) models fail to consider such testing behaviors. In this study, a new class of mixture IRT models was developed to account for such testing behavior in dichotomous and polytomous items, by assuming test‐takers were composed of multiple latent classes and by adding a decrement parameter to each latent class to describe performance decline. Parameter recovery, effect of model misspecification, and robustness of the linearity assumption in performance decline were evaluated using simulations. It was found that the parameters in the new models were recovered fairly well by using the freeware WinBUGS; the failure to account for such behavior by fitting standard IRT models resulted in overestimation of difficulty parameters on items located toward the end of the test and overestimation of test reliability; and the linearity assumption in performance decline was rather robust. An empirical example is provided to illustrate the applications and the implications of the new class of models.     

Performance of Nonrecursive Latent Variable Models under Misspecification

A problem central to structural equation modeling is measurement model specification error and its propagation into the structural part of nonrecursive latent variable models. Full-information estimation techniques such as maximum likelihood are consistent when the model is correctly specified and the sample size large enough; however, any misspecification within the model can affect parameter estimates in other parts of the model. The goals of this study included comparing the bias, efficiency, and accuracy of hypothesis tests in nonrecursive latent variable models with indirect and direct feedback loops. We compare the performance of maximum likelihood, two-stage least-squares and Bayesian estimators in nonrecursive latent variable models with indirect and direct feedback loops under various degrees of misspecification in small to moderate sample size conditions.     

An SEM Approach for the Evaluation of Intervention Effects Using Pre-Post-Post Designs

A directly applicable latent variable modeling procedure for classical item analysis is outlined. The method allows one to point and interval estimate item difficulty, item correlations, and item-total correlations for composites consisting of categorical items. The approach is readily employed in empirical research and as a by-product permits examining the latent structure of tentative versions of multiple-component measuring instruments. The discussed procedure is straightforwardly utilized with the increasingly popular latent variable modeling software Mplus, and is illustrated on a numerical example.     

The Effect of Model Misspecification on Classification Decisons Made Using a Computerized Test

Many computerized testing algorithms require the fitting of some item response theory (IRT) model to examinees' responses to facilitate item selection, the determination of test stopping rules, and classification decisions. Some IRT models are thought to be particularly useful for small volume certification programs that wish to make the transition to computerized adaptive testing (CAT). The one-parameter logistic model (1-PLM) is usually assumed to require a smaller sample size than the three-parameter logistic model (3-PLM) for item parameter calibrations. This study examined the effects of model misspecification on the precision of the decisions made using the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT). For this comparison, the 1-PLM was used to estimate item parameters, even though the items' characteristics were represented by a 3-PLM. Results demonstrated that the 1-PLM produced considerably more decision errors under simulation conditions similar to a real testing environment, compared to the true model and to a fixed-form standard reference set of items.     

Modeling Growth in Electronic Learning Environments Using a Longitudinal Random Item Response Model

In educational environments, monitoring persons' progress over time may help teachers to evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching procedures. Electronic learning environments are increasingly being used as part of formal education and resulting datasets can be used to understand and to improve the environment. This study presents longitudinal models based on the item response theory (IRT) for measuring persons' ability within and between study sessions in data from web-based learning environments. Two empirical examples are used to illustrate the presented models. Results show that by incorporating time spent within- and between-study sessions into an IRT model; one is able to track changes in ability of a population of persons or for groups of persons at any time of the learning process.     

Estimating Non-Normal Latent Trait Distributions within Item Response Theory Using True and Estimated Item Parameters

Item response theory (IRT) procedures have been used extensively to study normal latent trait distributions and have been shown to perform well; however, less is known concerning the performance of IRT with non-normal latent trait distributions. This study investigated the degree of latent trait estimation error under normal and non-normal conditions using four latent trait estimation procedures and also evaluated whether the test composition, in terms of item difficulty level, reduces estimation error. Most importantly, both true and estimated item parameters were examined to disentangle the effects of latent trait estimation error from item parameter estimation error. Results revealed that non-normal latent trait distributions produced a considerably larger degree of latent trait estimation error than normal data. Estimated item parameters tended to have comparable precision to true item parameters, thus suggesting that increased latent trait estimation error results from latent trait estimation rather than item parameter estimation.     

Factors Affecting the Item Parameter Estimation and Classification Accuracy of the DINA Model

To better understand the statistical properties of the deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate cognitive diagnosis (DINA) model, the impact of several factors on the quality of the item parameter estimates and classification accuracy was investigated. Results of the simulation study indicate that the fully Bayes approach is most accurate when the prior distribution matches the latent class structure. However, when the latent classes are of indefinite structure, the empirical Bayes method in conjunction with an unstructured prior distribution provides much better estimates and classification accuracy. Moreover, using empirical Bayes with an unstructured prior does not lead to extremely poor results as other prior-estimation method combinations do. The simulation results also show that increasing the sample size reduces the variability, and to some extent the bias, of item parameter estimates, whereas lower level of guessing and slip parameter is associated with higher quality item parameter estimation and classification accuracy.     

DINA模型项目参数偏差对知识状态估计的影响

近年来关于DINA模型的相关研究显示,样本量、先验分布、经验贝叶斯或完全贝叶斯估计方法、样本的代表性、项目功能差异和Q阵误指等,均可能是导致DINA项目参数估计发生偏差的原因。使用Monte Carlo模拟试验,对DINA项目参数(猜测参数和失误参数)的组合变化类型和偏差量进行考察,通过条件极大似然估计法估计知识状态,发现项目参数估计值与真值偏差不大时,对知识状态估计的精度影响不大;但是项目参数偏离真值较大时,尤其是在三种组合类型上,对属性掌握存在明显的高估或低估现象。研究结果对于诊断测验等值有一定的启示:若两个测验上锚题的项目参数出现了较大的偏差(0.1),则需要考虑等值的必要性。     

Semiparametric Item Response Functions in the Context of Guessing

We present a logistic function of a monotonic polynomial with a lower asymptote, allowing additional flexibility beyond the three‐parameter logistic model. We develop a maximum marginal likelihood‐based approach to estimate the item parameters. The new item response model is demonstrated on math assessment data from a state, and a computationally efficient strategy for choosing the order of the polynomial is demonstrated. Finally, our approach is tested through simulations and compared to response function estimation using smoothed isotonic regression. Results indicate that our approach can result in small gains in item response function recovery and latent trait estimation.