萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说与外语教学

萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说是上个世纪语言学上具有重大意义的理论，该理论的核心就是语言决定思维。作为一种语言理论，萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说中的合理成份对外语教学的作用一直未受到学界的重视。本文试图从语言影响思维的角度探讨萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说对外语教学所具有的意义。     

萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说理论观照下的英语学习

对于中国目前的英语热，近年来反对的呼声日益高涨。萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说理论认为，语言影响思维。换句话说，语言学习不仅影响学习者的思想，而且它还会影响学习者的思维方式。我们认为，单从语言与思维角度来看待英语学习对中国的重要性，我们就应该继续提但和推广英语。     

萨丕尔——沃尔夫假说解析

萨丕尔——沃尔夫假说自问世以来就倍受争议。本文从萨丕尔沃尔夫假说的起源、发展等方面对假说进行分析和评述。     

从英汉性别语言再议萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说

萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说的核心内容是思维和语言的相互关系问题。萨丕尔和沃尔夫两人并未明确提出语言决定思维,但肯定了语言对思维的影响作用。"辩证统一"的哲学理论认为语言和思维是相互矛盾但又密不可分的,是辩证统一的关系。英语性别语言和汉语性别语言这两种不同的语言的形成和变化说明思维决定语言,而性别语言的改观也对社会思维产生了深刻的影响,即"思维决定语言,语言影响思维",有力否定了语言决定思维的论断。     

“萨丕尔·沃尔夫假说”述评

"萨丕尔.沃尔夫假说"自问世以来影响巨大,争议不断,本文在对其作大致客观的描述和整合国内学者研究基础上,试图得出一种中立的、较为合理的观点,即语言与思维(思想、逻辑、理性)至少不是平行时空下两条互不相交的直线,而是以一种至今还未明朗的关系紧紧交织在一起,语言并不仅仅是思维的附属工具,彼此间确实存在着相互影响。     

萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说理论观照下的英语学习

对于中国目前的英语热,近年来反对的呼声日益高涨。萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说理论认为,语言影响思维。换句话说,语言学习不仅影响学习者的思想,而且它还会影响学习者的思维方式。我们认为,单从语言与思维角度来看待英语学习对中国的重要性,我们就应该继续提但和推广英语。     

“萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说”解析

＂萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说＂又称语言相对论,它所涉及的语言和思维、文化关系问题从20世纪三四十年代提出之后,一直是语言学界争论不休的话题,也是人类学、语义学、语用学、社会语言学和心理语言学等学科所共同关心的课题。＂假说＂分为强式和弱式两种。强式即语言决定论,主张语言结构决定人的思维方式,并主导着感知行为,即语言决定思维、信念、态度等。弱式即语言相对论,主张语言只是在一定程度上影响思维,并不起制约或主导作用,只是在一定程度上起着模塑人的思维、影响人的思想的作用。     

浅谈萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说对中国外语教与学的启示

萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说是探究语言与思维、文化之间关系的重要理论,是上个世纪语言学上具有重大意义的理论。语言影响思维作为萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说的核心部分,对我国外语教与学的启示一直未受到学界的重视。本文试图从语言影响思维的角度探讨萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说对中国外语教学以及外语学习的启示和指导意义,以期促进我国外语教学的发展更上新的台阶,促使外语学习者更好地学习目的语,帮助成功实现跨文化交际。     

对萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说的反思

从哲学及心理学的角度对萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说及其众多解释的分析表明了假说本身的隐晦及语言学者们对假说理解的不足。在此基础上进行反思提出了较萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说更为合理的解释。     

萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说与中亚留学生汉语教学

萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说是研究语言和思维、文化之间关系的理论,这一假说具有重大意义,已引起众多学者从不同的角度进行解读。萨丕尔—沃尔夫假说在第二语言教学中也具有很大指导意义,通过对语言和思维关系与语言和文化关系对中亚留学生汉语教学影响的分析,学生可以更好地掌握汉语,促进汉语国际推广工作的开展。     

Study on Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Language,thought and culture are closely related to one another. Both language and thought are culturally loaded and dependent,as culture is an almost all-inclusive complicated system with thought,views of the world,patterns of thinking,values,beliefs,customs and language as its underlying bases. Concerning the relationship between language,thought and culture,the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis might be the most significant but controversial one,attracting much attention yet arousing great contention. Thus,in this paper,my thesis focuses on studying language,thought and culture revolved around Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis.     

Cognition and Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Over the last 60 years, a wide range of theories about the relationship between language and thought have been developed and disputed. The theories that posit some shaping or determining effect of language on thought are typically grouped under the rubric of linguistic relativity theories, or more popularly, the Sapir- Whorf Hypothesis （SWH）.     

Cognition and Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

正Over the last 60 years,a wide range of theories about the relationship between language and thought have been developed and disputed.The theories that posit some shaping or determining effect of language on thought are typically grouped under the rubric of linguistic relativity theories,or more popularly,the SapirWhorf Hypothesis(SWH).Interestingly,the long-standing controversy over linguistic relativity has been only modestly impacted by two     

Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Translation

Sapir-Whorf hypothesis has its implication in translation studies. Each language is a peculiar whole. It is a product, even an expression, of the spiritual personality and the cultural particularity. Translation is a kind of interlingual and intercultural communication. It involves not only the transference from one language into another, but a whole set of extra-linguistic criteria. In translating we are always crossing a greater or lesser barrier or divide.     

From Grammatical Gender to Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

<正>Comment on Vigliocco,G.et al.(2005)and Review on SapirWhorf Hypothesis Does language shape thought?The question derived from Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis has never been easy to answer with certainty.Nevertheless,the attempts and trials of tackling this question seldom stops.The Vigliocco et al.paper"Grammatical     

从认知语言学角度探究“萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说”

在探讨语言与思维的关系时,"萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说"不可或缺。这一假说使人们对语言与思维之间关系的讨论达到高潮,却也遭到不少诟病。随着认知语言学的兴起,这一假说又重新回到人们的视野中。拟从认知语言学的角度,探究"萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说",发现认知语言学实证研究主要从三个方面有力地支持了这一假说:(1)语言对空间认知的影响;(2)语言对时间认知的影响;(3)语言对性别认知的影响。