标记对聋生句子意义整体理解水平影响的实验研究

本文采用实验研究的方法,研究了标记对聋生句子意义整体理解水平的影响。结果表明:标记能够有效提高聋生对句子意义整体理解的水平。标记情况与句子长度之间存在着交互作用:在无标记的情况下,聋生对短句和中句的整体理解成绩最高;在有标记的情况下,聋生对中句意义的整体理解成绩最高。标记对长句的整体理解成绩提高幅度最大。无论是有标记还是无标记,聋生对长句的整体理解水平都是最低的。     

初中聋生篇章阅读的眼动特征:教师作为研究者

研究3名初中聋生的眼动数据发现:在一般的教学环境中,聋生能有规律地逐行阅读教室投影屏幕上的篇章文本,平均阅读速度255字/分钟,每次注视1.53个字符,每个注视点持续0.36秒,注视频率2.83次/秒;语文学习成绩与聋生的篇章阅读情况存在关联,优秀生比待进生的阅读速度快、注视点总数少、注视点平均持续时间短、注视频率高、阅读理解情况好.     

浅谈中学语文教学中段落衔接策略

衔接是篇章的有形网络．汉语句子与句子之间、段落与段落之间的衔接一般具有明显的形式标记,是语言的表层结构,在教学中容易发现和操作。其中,段落间的衔接在中学生的阅读和写作实践中有非常重要的意义．阅读中抓住段落衔接的标志性词语,可以紧跟作者思路．快速理清文章层次,提高阅读速度,同时有助于进行深度阅读。     

川渝地区中学聋生课外阅读状况的调查与分析

课外阅读在聋生知、情、意的培养以及融入社会的过程中起着不可替代的作用。本研究主要采用自编问卷,调查川渝地区10所特殊教育学校401名初高中聋生的课外阅读状况。调查结果发现:川渝地区中学聋生课外阅读整体情况不佳,课外阅读期望和兴趣较高,而课外阅读氛围和物质条件较差,聋生认识到课外阅读的作用,但认为课外读物很难看懂;聋生对课外阅读有着较大兴趣,但阅读图书数量较少;聋生亟待养成良好的课外阅读习惯,每天阅读时间不足半小时;学校和家庭尚未给聋生提供丰富的课外阅读物质条件,也没有营造出浓厚的课外阅读氛围,尤其是家庭;聋生非常期望教师加强课外阅读指导,改善图书馆(室)状况。     

高职聋生阅读心理结构分析及阅读教学建议

阅读是聋生认识世界的最基本方法,是一种由多种心理因素参与的认知活动。阅读能力是聋生语言能力发展的基础,然而,高职聋生的整体阅读水平远低于健听人。缺乏一定的背景知识、阅读结构能力较弱和阅读理解监控水平低下是聋生阅读理解的障碍。在阅读教学实践中,可以通过加强背景知识的教学,强化阅读能力训练,重视阅读策略的教学等途径来提高聋生的阅读能力。     

阅读教学引导聋生对话文本的策略

阅读教学是教师引导聋生不断与文本对话的过程。但是由于耳聋的缺陷,严重影响了聋生的阅读,影响了聋生与教师、文本三者之间的对话。聋校阅读教学应该遵循“整体—局部—整体”这样一个阅读规律,把对文本字、词、句、段、篇的语文基础知识的训练与培养聋生听、说、读、写的语文能力有机的结合起来,从而有效与文本对话,提高阅读教学质量。     

语感教学对提高聋生阅读能力的实验研究

本实验通过语感教学方法和传统教学方法对聋生阅读能力的教学效果产生的影响进行对比研究,结果显示为实验班与对照班聋生的阅读能力存在极其显著性差异在阅读能力等级测试万面,实验班与对照班聋生的认知性阅读能力水平存在显著性差异,理解性和评价性阅读能力水平则无显著性差异.从而证实了语感教学方法能在培养聋生阅读兴趣的基础上促进聋生在教学过程中主动化参与程度和提高聋生的阅读能力.     

提高聋生语言表达能力，让聋生有“感”而“发”——以《传统节日》教学为例

提高聋生语言表达能力是聋校语文课程的重要目标之一。在语文教学中教师要注重平日积累,引导聋生丰富的语言积累,培养语感,发展思维,联系生活实际,运用信息媒介,优化课堂教学,帮助聋生逐步形成适应实际生活需要的阅读能力、写作能力和沟通交往能力,促进聋生语言表达能力的提高。     

高职聋生语文阅读教学研究

高职聋生阅读水平较低,在阅读教学教程中教师应着力解决聋生在实际阅读中遇到的问题．并培养聋生独立思考、解决问题的能力,加强课内外阅读．切实提高聋生的阅读理解能力。     

文言散文阅读的整体感知

要提高文言散文的阅读能力,整体感知是非常重要的。因为文言文阅读重在理解和分析,而无论是词语、句子,还是段落、篇章,其理解和分析,都是一个由整体到局部、由局部到整体多次反复的过程。文言文与现代文的一个很大不同点,在于语言。理解词语、句子,是阅读文言文     

Deaf college students' reading comprehension and strategy use

Two comprehension studies were conducted with 46 deaf college students. In the first, 20 deaf college students representing higher and lower reading-ability levels were tested for correctly stating the main idea of a passage, answering content questions, indicating their understanding of the words and phrases, and recognizing a topically incongruent sentence embedded in the passage. The results suggest that deaf students profess a better understanding of what they read than they are able to demonstrate. The students' inability to identify a topically incongruent sentence in the passage further suggests a need for them to more carefully and accurately evaluate their understanding of what they are reading. A second study investigated the effect of strategy review instruction on deaf college students' comprehension of short reading passages. Students reading at a higher level showed improved comprehension on the posttraining passage, but students reading at a lower level did not. Similarly, the control group of deaf students comparable to the higher-level readers did not show improved comprehension.     

文言文教学五法

文言文在高中课本及高考试卷中皆占有重要的地位,在日常教学中教师应当用新颖有趣的教学内容和方法激发学生学习兴趣,并重视培养学生的诵读能力,在深入理解文章内容基础之上培养学生文言文鉴赏水平。     

Deaf college students' perspectives on literacy portfolios

The study examined how literacy portfolios were used as tools in a college developmental English class in which deaf students assessed their reading comprehension as well as their writing processes and products. The students' reading and writing assignments involved reflective thinking and were grounded in authentic tasks. Immediate feedback was provided. The study was multidimensional, longitudinal, and ongoing. A variety of field research techniques were used to ascertain the uses and influences of portfolios in regard to students' reading, writing, and reflective thinking. The results support the idea that the use of literacy portfolios can positively influence students who are deaf when they assess their reading and writing abilities.     

Deaf college students' mathematical skills relative to morphological knowledge, reading level, and language proficiency

This study of deaf college students examined specific relationships between their mathematics performance and their assessed skills in reading, language, and English morphology. Simple regression analyses showed that deaf college students' language proficiency scores, reading grade level, and morphological knowledge regarding word segmentation and meaning were all significantly correlated with both the ACT Mathematics Subtest and National Technical Institute for the Deaf (NTID) Mathematics Placement Test scores. Multiple regression analyses identified the best combination from among these potential independent predictors of students' performance on both the ACT and NTID mathematics tests. Additionally, the participating deaf students' grades in their college mathematics courses were significantly and positively associated with their reading grade level and their knowledge of morphological components of words.     

Semantic and pragmatic factors influencing deaf and hearing students' comprehension of english sentences containing numeral quantifiers

This research contrasted deaf and hearing students' interpretive knowledge of English sentences containing numeral quantifier phrases and indefinite noun phrases. A multiple-interpretation picture task methodology was used to assess 305 participants' judgments of the compatibility of sentence meanings with depicted discourse contexts. Participants' performance was assessed on the basis of hearing level (deaf, hearing) and grade level (middle school, high school, college). The deaf students were predicted to have differential access to specific sentence interpretations in accordance with the relative derivational complexity of the targeted sentence types. Hypotheses based on the pressures of derivational economy on acquisition were largely supported. The results also revealed that the deaf participants tended to overactivate pragmatic processes that yielded principled, though non-target, sentence interpretations. Collectively, the results not only contribute to the understanding of English acquisition under conditions of restricted access to spoken language input, they also suggest that pragmatic factors may play a broad role in influencing, and compromising, deaf students' reading comprehension and written expression.     

Reading? ... pah! (I got it!). Innovative Reading Technique For Successful Deaf Readers

A reading program utilizing five components--a shortcut to phonemic awareness, Adapted Dolch words, Bridge lists and the Bridging process, reading comprehension, and American Sign Language development/language experience stories--was administered to 48 elementary school students at a residential school for the deaf. Data analyses reveal dramatic gains in students' reading levels and academic behavior, teachers' growth in reflective sign skills, and students' and teachers' overall growth in ASL skills, resulting in a more organized, consistent approach to linguistic input and usage.     

Where is it? How deaf adolescents complete fact-based internet search tasks

An exploratory study was designed to describe Internet search behaviors of deaf adolescents who used Internet search engines to complete fact-based search tasks. The study examined search behaviors of deaf high school students such as query formation, query modification, Web site identification, and Web site selection. Consisting of two fact-based search tasks, the study was done in four regional day school programs for the deaf. As students conducted two search tasks, they completed task analyses of the selected Web sites and gave reasons for their selections. The research also identified the processes used by deaf students to compensate for limited English reading abilities while navigating search engines results that were typically written well above deaf students' average reading level. The results demonstrated that deaf adolescents were unable to initiate, conduct, analyze, or validate effective Internet searches in response to fact-based search tasks.     

The teaching and learning of multimeaning words within a metacognitively based curriculum

The study explored the effects of an 8-week intervention in which a teacher/researcher used direct instruction to show the multiple meanings of 7 words to 4 deaf students ages 11-13 years in a school for the deaf. Applying conclusions from emerging research that links knowledge and strategy with metacognitive skills, the teacher/researcher used specific metacognitive strategies to facilitate both the acquisition of the concept of multimeaning words and the ability to distinguish one meaning from another while reading, and thus improved the students' reading comprehension. The study participants were able to increase their vocabulary of multimeaning words as well as their reading comprehension in general, and, overall, experienced an improvement in their observable understanding and confidence when approaching the task of reading.     

The relationship between reading achievement and morphological word analysis in deaf and hearing students matched for reading level

This study extends the findings of Gaustad, Kelly, Payne, and Lylak (2002), which showed that deaf college students and hearing middle school students appeared to have approximately the same morphological knowledge and word segmentation skills. Because the average grade level reading abilities for the two groups of students were also similar, those research findings suggested that deaf students' morphological development was progressing as might be expected relative to reading level. This study further examined the specific relationship between morphologically based word identification skills and reading achievement levels, as well as differences in the error patterns of deaf and hearing readers. Comparison of performance between pairs of deaf college students and hearing middle school students matched for reading achievement level shows significant superiority of younger hearing participants for skills relating especially to the meaning of derivational morphemes and roots, and the segmentation of words containing multiple types of morphemes. Group subtest comparisons and item analysis comparisons of specific morpheme knowledge and word segmentation show clear differences in the morphographic skills of hearing middle school readers over deaf college students, even though they were matched and appear to read at the same grade levels, as measured by standardized tests.