保罗·弗莱雷“对话式教学”新论

巴西著名教育家保罗·弗莱雷以意识化为核心思想的解放教育理论,主张教育实现从银行储蓄观到解放教育观的根本转向,呼吁以解放人性的对话式教学置换驯化本质的讲解式教学,肩负起唤醒被压迫者的解放意识之光荣使命。弗莱雷富有创意、独具特色的对话式教学理念,不仅对发展中国家的教育,对世界亦产生了广泛而深远的影响。     

保罗·弗莱雷的对话式教学及启示

保罗·弗莱雷在其代表作《被压迫者的教育学》中提出了闻名于世的“解放教育思想”,其中最主要的有“对话式教学”。弗莱雷用“对话式教学”来批判传统的“讲授式教学”,用“解放教育观”向“储蓄教育观”宣战,具有很大的启发意义。     

保罗·弗莱雷的对话式教学思想对提高学校德育工作实效的启示

本文通过对保罗·弗莱雷的对话式教学思想的评介，从德育师生关系和德育方法角度阐述了其对我国德育工作实践的启示。     

走向对话式教学

“对话式教学”是以对话为原则所进行的一种教学方式,其终极目标是实现教育的解放。它是培养学生批判性思维、觉醒意识以及人性化转变的重要途径。通过阐述对话式教学的实质、条件和特征,分析对话式教学的现实意义,其目的在于找到对话式教学的实施途径,达到最佳的教学效果。     

弗莱雷对话式教学理念对教学的启示

巴西教育家保罗·弗莱雷的对话式教学理论认为：对话是解决教育中不平等现象的重要途径,其理念对我国正在实施的新一轮基础教育改革具有重要启示。开展对话教学需要彻底转变“师本位”的观念,创建师生学习共同体,课堂之上综合使用各种教学方法。     

试论费莱雷的对话式教学及其现实意义

巴西著名教育家弗莱雷(FreirePaulo)在其代表作《被压迫者教育学》中提出了闻名于世的解放教育理论,该理论的核心就是对话式教学。弗莱雷把对话不仅仅视为一种教学方法,而且把对话与人性的丰富和完善紧密地结合起来。对话式教学思想对我们今天的教育理论建设和教育实践仍然有很强的借鉴意义。     

保罗·弗莱雷的教育思想

文章分析了巴西教育家保罗·弗莱雷在其著作《被压迫者教育学》一书中的教育思想:压迫者与被压迫者之间的辩证关系;教育学中的被压迫现象。     

保罗·弗莱雷的成人教育理论和实践

本文阐述了弗莱雷对成人教育的性质、目的和方法的独特观点 ,并分析了其成人教育思想的特点、实践影响和对我国成人教育的启示     

费莱雷“对话式教学”及其现实意义

巴西著名教育家费莱雷(Freire Paulo)在其代表作《被压迫者教育学》中提出了闻名于世的解放教育思想,该思想的核心就是对话式教学。弗莱雷不仅仅视对话为一种教学方法,而且把对话与人性的丰富、完善紧密结合起来。这种对话式教学思想对我们今天的教学实践有很强的指导意义。     

对弗莱雷"对话式"教学的分析及启示

对话式教学是保罗·弗莱雷解放教育理论的重要组成部分.有利于实现课堂生态化.本文主要分析了弗莱雷对话式教学的形成基础和条件、开展的内容和机制.以期将其理念运用到教育所涉及的各个层次和领域.对我国的课堂教学及教育事业的建设有所增益.     

保罗·弗莱雷成人教学思想述评

保罗.弗莱雷作为世界上有较大影响的教育家之一,他的成人教学思想博大精深、影响深远。本文从师生关系、教学方法、教学内容、教学原则、教学评价几个方面阐述保罗.弗莱雷的成人教学思想,并对其进行简要评价。     

论教学日记及其对话艺术

作为教学对话的＂教学日记＂,在教师职业生涯的发展历程中,起着十分重要的作用。它不仅是一种教学的对话形式,教学现象的剖析工具,教学思考的真实记录,而且是教师所担当的一种教育责任,是形成教学思想,优化教学方法,培育教学精神的锐利武器。为此必须从教学战略的高度来认识教学日记的重要功能,从制度层面上建构教学日记的结构体系,养成记日记、用日记、析日记的习惯,使教学日记成为展现、记录、完善教学生命历程的重要工具。     

明确教学内容，走出浮泛“对话”

“教什么”的问题是目前语文教学包括阅读课教学首先要解决的问题,要想走出阅读课教学的低效,首要之务是在教学中强化“内容”意识,明确“教什么”,走出浮泛对话的误区。对话理论引进语文教学领域给语文教学注入了生气和活力,但哲学层面的对话不能简单地照抄照搬到语文阅读课教学。语文阅读课教学要强化“内容”意识,要在关照学生的前提之下,关照文本、关照课程、关照学科、关照目标,合理确定教学内容,走出浮泛对话,从而提高阅读课的教学效果。     

A limited,apolitical, and open Paulo Freire

Paulo Freire’s work is often characterized and used in terms that seek to produce widespread political and economic changes across societies. Peter Roberts, however, in his book Paulo Freire in the twenty-first Century, offers readers a much different way of approaching Freire’s work. Throughout his book, Roberts presents Freire as recognizing the limitations of educational initiatives, as not seeking specific macro-political objectives, and as emphasizing openness to alternative discourses. These themes weave throughout each chapter of the book, in which Roberts examines a wide range of topics, from Freire and Dostoevsky to reason and emotion to political correctness to Freire and the Tao Te Ching. In this review essay, I engage a number of purposes. I elucidate and trace these three themes as they weave throughout and support the various topics that Roberts examines in his book. I illustrate how Roberts’s treatment of these themes challenges many of the interpretations of Freire’s work found within the critical literature, and, through this critique, it offers readers new ways of thinking about Freire’s thinking. Lastly, I discuss how Roberts’s thoughts suggest new ways that Freire’s work, and critical education in general, might begin to make more meaningful and practical inroads into public education and might develop new avenues of scholarship on Freire’s work.     

Paulo Freire and the Politics of Education: A response to Neumann

Jacob Neumann provides a thoughtful reading of Paulo Freire in the 21^st century: Education, dialogue, and transformation. His comments on the importance of contextualising Freire’s work and the value of openness in engaging Freirean ideas are insightful and helpful. His use of the term ‘apolitical’ is, however, rather more problematic. Drawing on points made in Paulo Freire in the 21^st century, and with links to Freire’s wider philosophy and pedagogy, this article argues that education from a Freirean perspective is always political.     

Paulo Freire’s critical and dialogic pedagogy and its implications for the Bahraini educational context

Abstract

This paper is a conceptual analysis in methodology. The purpose it fulfils is that of analysing the critical and dialogic pedagogy of Paulo Freire, to arrive at implications of Freire’s philosophy and approach for the current educational context of the Kingdom of Bahrain. The Bahraini context is currently one of major economic, social, and educational reforms. Despite several reform initiatives, however, schools in Bahrain are still not advancing as they should be and deficiencies continue to exist in students’ development of higher-order thinking skills, such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and analysis. Among the implications made by this study are ones related to: teaching and learning practices within a classroom, cultivation of 21st Century skills, curriculum development and planning, and the role played by the teacher. The paper ends with a number of significant recommendations for teachers and policy-makers, which can enhance education in Bahrain and help it progress faster. These recommendations can also prove to be useful to other parallel contexts regionally and internationally.     

哲学践行中的“他者”及其践行意义

拉康的他者理论产生过很大影响,它促使我们将目光从主体需要转变到主体的行动或欲望上来。但是,这一理论也有一种消极性,因为任由主体欲望的释放,只会使得我们之间的交流距离越来越大,从而容易割裂我们彼此之间的关联性,最终走向他者的反面或瓦解他者。哲学践行这一新的哲学范式,可以弥补他者理论的这种不足。我们可以通过一种逻辑分析,给出他者介入我们实际生活的哲学践行式的可能路径,从而使得哲学研究回归到人的实践本性上来。