Why People Dual Screen Political Debates and Why It Matters for Democratic Engagement

Dual screening during televised election debates is a new domain in which political elites and journalists seek to influence audience attitudes and behavior. But to what extent do non-elite dual screeners seek to influence others, particularly their social media followers, social media users in general, and even politicians and journalists? And how does this behavior affect short- and longer-term engagement with election campaigns? Using unique, event-based, panel survey data from the main 2015 UK general election debate (Wave 1 = 2,351; Wave 2 = 1,168) we reveal the conditions under which people experience agency, empowerment, and engagement now that social media have reconfigured broadcast political television.     

正确把握和运用邓小平理论中的讲大局思想

讲大局思想是邓小平理论的重要组成部分.讲大局是党性原则的体现,是讲政治的起码要求;讲大局是传统美德的折射,是讲正气的重要内涵;讲大局是辩证思维的反映,是科学的方法论.自觉学习、正确把握和运用邓小平理论中的讲大局思想,对于深入开展"三讲"教育,提高干部队伍素质,把建设有中国特色社会主义伟大事业不断推向前进,具有十分重大的现实意义.     

模糊控制技术在空调系统中的应用

本文从实际工程出发,对沈阳某智能大厦A区空调系统的控制策略进行改进,对于空调机组(AHU),利用模糊自适应PID控制代替不够理想的PID控制,从而实现对具有非线性、时变性、干扰大、大滞后因素和不确定随机干扰因素的系统优化控制。较原来的PID控制策略有着收敛速度快、过渡时间短、超调量小、适应能力强等优点,并且节约了能源。     

中国城市软件产业发展格局研究

软件产业是一种典型的城市经济形态,但并不是所有的城市都具有发展软件产业的区位优势。本文以信息产业部公布历年软件企业百强资讯为依据,尝试描述、分析我国软件产业发展空间聚集特点、软件产业发展的产业生态环境和演进态势。     

关于新时期德育实效性的思考

品德的形成不同于知识的掌握，它是个极为复杂的过程，因而评价规范个体化的标准重点在于德行，而不在于认知。学校的德育工作应有明确而可行的要求，有切实的内容，有广泛的社会认同和心理基础，才能增强德育的实效性。     

Ordering disorders; linking organization design and knowledge integration

Studies addressing the connections between knowledge and organization structures can be divided into two classes. One class holds that a perspective on knowledge signals shortcomings of classical design principles and calls for flatter hierarchy and less specification of the production structure. Another class maintains that a knowledge perspective on organizations is at odds with any design perspective, whether classical or not, because the emergent, thoroughly social and practice-based nature of knowledge as knowing in action makes knowledge a useless and even dangerous beacon to designers: ex ante, knowledge is said to be fundamentally indeterminate and any attempt to ‘structure around knowledge’ may effectively drive out knowledge. To explore differences and possible bridges between these two calls of studies, the paper explores how both elements of the equation, organization structure and organizational knowledge, are to be conceived to ensure a meaningful connection between them. It is argued that the grouping focus in both defines the meeting place of organization structures and organizational knowledge, but shows that the involved knowledge and grouping concepts are not mutually compatible. It leads to a view where organization structures are seen as the ‘seeding’ background for knowledge integration processes that, in turn, constitute the patterns of work relationships envisioned in the designer's organizational decomposition and grouping. For illustration purposes, the paper presents the example of the Max Planck Institute that describes one possible way through the conceptual model presented in the paper.