Adaptation of instructional materials: a commentary on the research on adaptations of Who Polluted the Potomac

This commentary first summarizes and discusses the analysis of the two translation processes described in the Oliveira, Colak, and Akerson article and the inferences these researchers make based on their research. In the second part of the commentary, we describe procedures and criteria used in adapting tests into different languages and how they may apply to adaptation of instructional materials. The authors provide a good theoretical analysis of what took place in two translation instances and make an important contribution by taking the first step in providing a systematic discussion of adaptation of instructional materials. Our discussion proposes procedures for adapting instructional materials for examining equivalence of source and target versions of adapted instructional materials. We highlight that many of the procedures and criteria used in examining comparability of educational tests is missing in this emerging research of area.

Book reviews

Northeastern University     

Effect of haemolysis on an enzymatic measurement of ethanol

IntroductionWe investigated the interference of haemolysis on ethanol testing carried out with the Synchron assay kit using an AU680 autoanalyser (Beckman Coulter, Brea, USA).Materials and methodsTwo tubes of plasma samples were collected from 20 volunteers. Mechanical haemolysis was performed in one tube, and no other intervention was performed in the other tube. After centrifugation, haemolysed and non-haemolysed samples were diluted to obtain samples with the desired free haemoglobin (Hb) values (0, 1, 2, 5, 10 g/L). A portion of these samples was then separated, and ethanol was added to the separated sample to obtain a concentration of 86.8 mmol/L ethanol. After that, these samples were diluted with ethanol-free samples with the same Hb concentration to obtain samples containing 43.4, 21.7, and 10.9 mmol/L. Each group was divided into 20 equal parts, and an ethanol test was carried out. The coefficient of variation (CV), bias, and total error (TE) values were calculated.ResultsThe TE values of haemolysis-free samples were approximately 2-5%, and the TE values of haemolysed samples were approximately 10-18%. The bias values of haemolysed samples ranged from nearly - 6.2 to - 15.7%.ConclusionsHaemolysis led to negative interference in all samples. However, based on the 25% allowable total error value specified for ethanol in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA 88) criteria, the TE values did not exceed 25%. Consequently, ethanol concentration can be measured in samples containing free Hb up to 10 g/L.