Support services to relocated families increase employee job performance

Conclusion When the stress level is lowered, the relocated employee can turn attention away from the urgency and upset of resettling the family and concentrate fully on the new position thus becoming productive more quickly. With careful planning among the family, relocation counselor and real estate agent/broker, the move can be made much more effectively and happily.Janice Y. Benjamin is President of the Career Management Center in Kansas City, Missouri and author of the career series,How to Be Happily Employed.Lorrie Eigles is a career consultant at the Center Management Center specializing in spousal relocation.     

Stimulus control of immunization against chronic learned helplessness

Two experiments investigated the effectiveness of multiple (five) sessions of signaled eseapable-shock pretraining in preventing (immunizing against) the shack-escape impairment produced by an equal number of sessions of signaled inescapable shock. In Experiment 1, rats were exposed to 50 pairings per session of a white-noise stimulus with escapable shock during the immunization phase. Subsequently, they were exposed to 50 pairings per session of a different (houselight) stimulus with inescapable shock. Shock-escape performance in a shuttlebox test with constant illumination revealed no evidence of immunization relative to the performance of rats given five prior sessions of light-signaled inescapable shock only. Experiment 2 was identical in all respects to Experiment 1, except that both the escapable- and the inescapable-shock phases for animals in the immunization treatment group involved the same stimulus (houseüght) as a shock signal. Under these circumstances, the prior escapable-shock training significantly reduced the shuttle-box escape deficit engendered by chronic exposure to signaled inescapable shock; performance in the shuttle-box was not reliably different from that of rats exposed to signaled escapable shock alone. These findings suggest that, under chronic conditions, the development of stimulus control using Pavlovian conditioning procedures may serve to modulate the normally prophylactic influence on later shock-escape acquisition of serial exposure to escapable and inescapable shocks.     

Improving Campus Climate to Support Faculty Diversity and Retention: A Pilot Program for New Faculty

We report on a series of pilot programs that we developed and carried out to support the success and satisfaction of new faculty, particularly faculty of color. We hope that others committed to retaining and supporting underrepresented faculty can apply our learning from this pilot project, as a whole or in part.Fred P. Piercy, Ph.D. (University of Florida), M.Ed. (University of South Carolina), B.A. (Wake Forest University) is the Department Head of the Department of Human Development at Virginia Tech. His professional interests include family therapy education, HIV social science research and prevention, and family intervention for adolescent drug abusers. Valerie Giddings, Ph.D., M.S. (Virginia Tech), B.S. (Bennett College) is the Associate Vice Chancellor for Lifelong Learning at Winston-Salem State University. Her professional interests include anthropometry and apparel fit, cultural aesthetics for apparel, and diversity issues in higher education. Katherine R. Allen, Ph.D., M.A. (Syracuse University), B.S. (University of Connecticut) is a Professor in Human Development at Virginia Tech. Her interests include family diversity over the life course, adult sibling ties in transition, and persistence of women and minorities in IT majors. Benjamin Dixon, Ed.D. (University of Massachusetts), M.A.T. (Harvard University), B.Mus.Ed. (Howard University) is the Vice President for Multicultural Affairs at Virginia Tech. His interests include diversity, multicultural education, ethical pluralism, and equity and inclusion issues related to organizational management and development. Peggy S. Meszaros, Ph.D. (University of Maryland), M.S. (University of Kentucky), B.S. (Austin Peay State University) is the William E. Lavery Professor of Human Development and the Director of the Center for Information Technology Impacts on Children, Youth, and Families at Virginia Tech. Her interests include positive youth development, leadership issues, female career transitions, and mother/daughter communication. Karen Joest, Ph.D. (Virginia Tech), M.S. (Chaminade University), B.S. (Indiana State University) is an Assistant Professor of Child and Family Studies at the State University of New York, College at Oneonta. Her interests include adolescents exposed to domestic violence, use of qualitative research, and use of technology and feminist pedagogy     

Magnetographic array for the capture and enumeration of single cells and cell pairs

We present a simple microchip device consisting of an overlaid pattern of micromagnets and microwells capable of capturing magnetically labeled cells into well-defined compartments (with accuracies >95%). Its flexible design permits the programmable deposition of single cells for their direct enumeration and pairs of cells for the detailed analysis of cell-cell interactions. This cell arraying device requires no external power and can be operated solely with permanent magnets. Large scale image analysis of cells captured in this array can yield valuable information (e.g., regarding various immune parameters such as the CD4:CD8 ratio) in a miniaturized and portable platform.The emergent need for point-of-care devices has spurred development of simplified platforms to organize cells across well-defined templates.¹ These devices employ passive microwells, immunospecific adhesive islands, and electric, optical, and acoustic traps to manipulate cells.^2–6 In contrast, magnetic templating can control the spatial organization of cells through its ability to readily program ferromagnetic memory states.⁷ While it has been applied to control the deposition of magnetic beads,^8–13 it has not been used to direct the deposition of heterogeneous cell pairs, which may help provide critical insight into the function of single cells.^14,15 As such, we developed a simple magnetographic device capable of arraying single cells and pairs of cells with high fidelity. We show this magnetic templating tool can use immunospecific magnetic labels for both the isolation of cells from blood and their organization into spatially defined wells.We used standard photolithographic techniques to fabricate the microchips (see supplementary material¹⁶). Briefly, an array of 10 × 30 μm cobalt micromagnets were patterned by a photolithographic liftoff process and overlaid with a pattern of dumbbell-shaped microwells formed in SU-8 photoresist (Fig. 1(a)). The micromagnets were designed to produce a predominantly vertical field in the microwells by aligning the ends of the micromagnet at the center of each well of the dumbbell. These features were deposited across an area of ≈400 mm² (>50 000 well pairs per microchip) (Fig. 1(b)). Depending on the programmed magnetization state with respect to the external field, magnetic beads or cells were attracted to one pole and repelled by the other pole of each micromagnet, leading to a biased deposition (Fig. 1(c)).¹²Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Magnetographic array for single cell analysis. (a) SEM image of the dumbbell-shaped well pairs for capturing magnetically labelled cells. (b) Photograph of the finished device. (c) An array of well pairs displaying a pitch of 60 × 120 μm before (top) and 10 min after the deposition of magnetic beads (bottom).To demonstrate the capability of the array to capture cells into a format amenable for rapid image processing, we organized CD3+ lymphocytes using only hand-held permanent magnets. We isolated CD3+ lymphocytes from blood via positive selection using anti-CD3 magnetic nanoparticles (EasySep™, STEMCELL Technologies) with purities confirmed by flow cytometry (97.8%; see supplementary material¹⁶). We then stained 1 × 10⁶ CD3+ cells with anti-CD8 Alexa-488 and anti-CD4 Alexa-647 (5 μl of each antibody in 100 μl for 20 min; BD Bioscience) to determine the CD4:CD8 ratio, a prognostic ratio for assessing the immune system.^17,18Variably spaced neodymium magnets (0.5 in. × 0.5 in. × 1 in.; K&J Magnetics, Inc.) were fixed on either side of the microchip to generate a tunable magnetic field (0–400 G; Fig. 2(a)). Using this setup, fluorescently labeled cells were deposited, and the populations of CD4+ and CD8+ cells were indiscriminately arrayed, imaged, and enumerated using ImageJ. The resulting CD4:CD8 ratio of 1.84 ± 0.18 (Fig. 2(b)) was confirmed by flow cytometry with a high correlation (5.4% difference; Fig. 2(c)), indicating the magnetographic microarray can pattern cells for the rapid and accurate assessment of critical phenotypical parameters without complex equipment (e.g., function generators or flow cytometers).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.CD8 analysis of CD3+ lymphocytes. (a) Photograph of the magnetographic device activated by permanent magnets (covered with green tape). The CD4:CD8 ratio determined by the (b) magnetographic microarray and (c) and (d) flow cytometry was 1.84 and 1.74, respectively.More complex operations, such as the programmed deposition of cell pairs, can be achieved by leveraging the switchable, bistable magnetization of the micromagnets for the detailed studies of cell-cell interactions (Figs. 3(a)–3(d)).¹² For these studies, a 200 G horizontal field generated from an electromagnetic coil was used to magnetize the micromagnets.¹⁹ We then captured different concentrations of magnetic beads as surrogates for cells (8.4 μm polystyrene, Spherotech, Inc.) and found that higher bead concentrations did not affect the capture accuracy (>95%; see supplementary material¹⁶).Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Programmed pairing of magnetic beads and CD3+ lymphocytes. (a) Schematic of the magnetographic cell pair isolations. (b) Polarized micromagnets isolate cells of one type to one side in a vertical magnetic field and then cells of a second type to the other side when the field is reversed. (c) Fluorescent image of magnetically trapped green stained (top) and red stained (bottom) cell pairs. (d) SEM image of magnetically labeled cells in the microwells. (e) Capture accuracy of magnetic bead pairs. (Each color (and shape) represents the field strength of the reversed field.) (f) Change in the capture accuracy (loss) of initially captured beads after reversing the magnetic field. The capture accuracy of (g) magnetically labeled cell pairs and (h) the second magnetically labeled cell (for (e)–(h): n = 5; time starts from the deposition of the second set of cells or beads).The opposite side of each micromagnet was then populated with the second (yellow fluorescent) bead by reversing the direction of the applied magnetic field. We tested several field strengths (i.e., 10, 25, 40, or 55 G) to optimize the conditions for isolating the desired bead in the opposite well without ejecting the first bead. If the field strength was too large, the previously deposited beads could be ejected from their wells due to the repulsive magnetic force overcoming gravity.¹² As shown in Figure 3(e), increasing the field strength from 10 to 25 G significantly increased the capture accuracy at 60 min from the deposition of the second bead (p < 0.01), but increases from 25 to 55 G did not affect the capture accuracy (p > 0.10). As shown in Figure 3(f), higher field strengths (i.e., 40 and 55 G) resulted in lower capture accuracies compared to lower field strengths (i.e., 10 and 25 G) (p < 0.01), which was primarily due to ejection of the initially captured beads when the micromagnets reversed their polarity.We then arranged pairs of membrane dyed (calcein AM, Invitrogen; PKH26, Sigma) magnetically labeled CD3+ lymphocytes. First, red stained cells (150 μl of 2 × 10⁴ cells/ml) were deposited on the microchip in the presence of 250 G vertical magnetic field. After 20 min, the field was reversed (i.e., to 40, 55, and 70 G) and green stained cells (150 μl of 2 × 10⁴ cells/ml) were deposited on the microchip with images taken in 10 min intervals. Fluorescence images were overlaid (Fig. 3(c)) and the capture accuracy of cell pairs was determined (ImageJ).As seen in Figure 3(g), the capture accuracy of pairs of CD3+ lymphocytes was lower than that of magnetic beads (Fig. 3(e)). However, as shown in Figure 3(h), the second set of cells (green fluorescent) exhibited an average capture accuracy of 91.8% ± 1.9%. This indicates that the lower capture accuracy of cell pairs was either due to the ejection of initially captured (red fluorescent) cells or the migration of initially captured cells through the connecting channel, resulting from their relatively high deformability compared to magnetic beads.In summary, we developed a simple device capable of organizing magnetic particles, cells, and pairs of cells into well-defined compartments. A major advantage of this system is the use of specific magnetic labels to both isolate cells and program their deposition. While the design of this device does not enable dynamic control of the spacing between captured cell pairs as does some dielectrophoresis-based devices,²⁰ it can easily capture cells with high fidelity using only permanent magnets and has clinical relevance in the assessment of immune parameters. These demonstrations potentiate a relatively simple and robust device where highly organized spatial arrangement of cells facilitates rapid and accurate analyses towards a functional and low-cost point-of-care device.