全文获取类型
收费全文 | 1222篇 |
免费 | 17篇 |
国内免费 | 1篇 |
专业分类
教育 | 1036篇 |
科学研究 | 7篇 |
各国文化 | 13篇 |
体育 | 22篇 |
文化理论 | 6篇 |
信息传播 | 156篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 5篇 |
2022年 | 2篇 |
2021年 | 8篇 |
2020年 | 11篇 |
2019年 | 17篇 |
2018年 | 32篇 |
2017年 | 36篇 |
2016年 | 34篇 |
2015年 | 28篇 |
2014年 | 42篇 |
2013年 | 277篇 |
2012年 | 45篇 |
2011年 | 43篇 |
2010年 | 31篇 |
2009年 | 32篇 |
2008年 | 31篇 |
2007年 | 33篇 |
2006年 | 32篇 |
2005年 | 31篇 |
2004年 | 39篇 |
2003年 | 32篇 |
2002年 | 33篇 |
2001年 | 38篇 |
2000年 | 25篇 |
1999年 | 17篇 |
1998年 | 13篇 |
1997年 | 10篇 |
1996年 | 7篇 |
1995年 | 17篇 |
1994年 | 26篇 |
1993年 | 19篇 |
1992年 | 9篇 |
1991年 | 13篇 |
1990年 | 21篇 |
1989年 | 10篇 |
1988年 | 11篇 |
1987年 | 16篇 |
1986年 | 12篇 |
1985年 | 10篇 |
1984年 | 8篇 |
1983年 | 11篇 |
1982年 | 7篇 |
1981年 | 10篇 |
1980年 | 10篇 |
1979年 | 11篇 |
1978年 | 10篇 |
1977年 | 7篇 |
1976年 | 6篇 |
1975年 | 3篇 |
1974年 | 3篇 |
排序方式: 共有1240条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
91.
92.
The present study describes and compares seating preferences among Taiwanese and American respondents. Using a questionnaire method, seating preferences were obtained for 75 male and 100 female college students from the United Slates, and for 29 male and 54 female teachers of English in Taiwan. Responses were obtained for all possible combinations of sex of interaction partner, location (task or social), and six interpersonal activities. Results were summarized in the form of proportions of respondents choosing each of four possible angles of interaction: corner, opposite, diagonal, and side seating. Comparisons were made using Chisquare tests for independence.In general, results showed that Taiwanese respondents, when compared to Americans, are more likely to prefer side seating and less likely to prefer corner seating. Culture, sex of respondents, and sex of interaction partner interact in influencing preferences. In the United States, seating preferences function to unite males with females and to separate same-sex partners, while the opposite is true in Taiwan. Results are interpreted in terms of implications for intercultural communication. 相似文献
93.
A field study was conducted in Israel to identify emblematic gestures recognized and used by Hebrew speakers. Studies which have identified the emblematic gestures of particular ethnic or national groups are reviewed and criticized. This study seeks to contribute increased rigor and systematology to the identification of particular groups' emblematic gestures.Twenty-six gestures commonly used in classroom interaction were selected for testing. The instrument used was Schneller's form, “Investigations of Interpersonal Communication in Israel.” Subjects included college students, members of YMCA classes for pensioners, and others. On the instrument, subjects noted their recognition and interpretations of the investigator's encoding intentions, their certainty or interpretation and where they learned each gesture.Whereas previous studies of this nature accepted around 70% interpretive agreement among subjects, this study indicates that at least 90% is a more reliable measure by which to label gestures “emblems.” In addition, correlations were tabulated for the effects of subjects' age, ethnicity, years in Israel, certainty about interpretation, and accuracy of interpretation.The findings of this study were: (a) eight gestures were identified as emblems, and three more gestures identified as possible emblems, (b) slightly negative although insignificant correlations were found between increased age, years in Israel, expressed certainty of interpretation and accuracy of interpretation, and (c) natives and subjects from 20–24 years of age tended to have the highest rates of expressed certainty of interpretation as well as accuracy of interpretation.The findings are compared with those of three other studies of Jews' gesturing and differences between the studies are considered. Recommendations include continuing such studies and comparing the results of related projects in order to form a comprehensive picture of particular groups of people.Limitations are discussed. These include: (a) a less than representative sample, (b) lack of a consistent conversational context, (c) potential for distortion in the decoding process, (d) the lack of a unified gesture labeling system, and (e) the possibility of cultural or researcher bias. 相似文献
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.