首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   540篇
  免费   16篇
教育   471篇
科学研究   6篇
各国文化   6篇
体育   6篇
信息传播   67篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   2篇
  2021年   6篇
  2020年   9篇
  2019年   11篇
  2018年   19篇
  2017年   27篇
  2016年   28篇
  2015年   24篇
  2014年   18篇
  2013年   125篇
  2012年   20篇
  2011年   20篇
  2010年   10篇
  2009年   9篇
  2008年   9篇
  2007年   12篇
  2006年   12篇
  2005年   10篇
  2004年   12篇
  2003年   9篇
  2002年   12篇
  2001年   21篇
  2000年   7篇
  1999年   8篇
  1998年   7篇
  1997年   9篇
  1996年   10篇
  1995年   8篇
  1994年   8篇
  1993年   9篇
  1992年   7篇
  1991年   6篇
  1990年   3篇
  1989年   2篇
  1988年   6篇
  1987年   2篇
  1986年   4篇
  1985年   4篇
  1984年   4篇
  1983年   4篇
  1982年   1篇
  1981年   1篇
  1980年   5篇
  1979年   2篇
  1978年   4篇
  1977年   2篇
  1976年   1篇
  1974年   1篇
  1973年   2篇
排序方式: 共有556条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
31.
Testing within the science classroom is commonly used for both formative and summative assessment purposes to let the student and the instructor gauge progress toward learning goals. Research within cognitive science suggests, however, that testing can also be a learning event. We present summaries of studies that suggest that repeated retrieval can enhance long-term learning in a laboratory setting; various testing formats can promote learning; feedback enhances the benefits of testing; testing can potentiate further study; and benefits of testing are not limited to rote memory. Most of these studies were performed in a laboratory environment, so we also present summaries of experiments suggesting that the benefits of testing can extend to the classroom. Finally, we suggest opportunities that these observations raise for the classroom and for further research.Almost all science classes incorporate testing. Tests are most commonly used as summative assessment tools meant to gauge whether students have achieved the learning objectives of the course. They are sometimes also used as formative assessment tools—often in the form of low-stakes weekly or daily quizzes—to give students and faculty members a sense of students’ progression toward those learning objectives. Occasionally, tests are also used as diagnostic tools, to determine students’ preexisting conceptions or skills relevant to an upcoming subject. Rarely, however, do we think of tests as learning tools. We may acknowledge that testing promotes student learning, but we often attribute this effect to the studying students do to prepare for the test. And yet, one of the most consistent findings in cognitive psychology is that testing leads to increased retention more than studying alone does (Roediger and Butler, 2011 ; Roediger and Pyc, 2012 ). This effect can be enhanced when students receive feedback for failed tests and can be observed for both short-term and long-term retention. There is some evidence that testing not only improves student memory of the tested information but also ability to remember related information. Finally, testing appears to potentiate further study, allowing students to gain more from study periods that follow a test. Given the potential power of testing as a tool to promote learning, we should consider how to incorporate tests into our courses not only to gauge students’ learning, but also to promote that learning (Klionsky, 2008 ).We provide six observations about the effects of testing from the cognitive psychology literature, summarizing key studies that led to these conclusions (see
StudyResearch question(s)ConclusionLength of delay before final testStudy participants
Repeated retrieval enhances long-term retention in a laboratory setting
“Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention” (Roediger and Karpicke, 2006a) Is a testing effect observed in educationally relevant conditions? Is the benefit of testing greater than the benefit of restudy? Do multiple tests produce a greater effect than a single test?Testing improved retention significantly more than restudy in delayed tests. Multiple tests provided greater benefit than a single test.Experiment 1: 2 d; 1 wk Experiment 2: 1 wkUndergraduates ages 18–24, Washington University
“Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests” (Smith and Karpicke, 2014) What effect does the type of question presented in retrieval practice have on long-term retention?Retrieval practice with multiple-choice, free-response, and hybrid formats improved students’ performance on a final, delayed test taken 1 wk later when compared with a no-retrieval control. The effect was observed for both questions that required only recall and those that required inference. Hybrid questions provided an advantage when the final test had a short-answer format.1 wkUndergraduates, Purdue University
“Retrieval practice produces more learning that elaborative studying with concept mapping” (Karpicke and Blunt, 2011) What is the effect of retrieval practice on learning relative to elaborative study using a concept map?Students in the retrieval-practice condition had greater gains in meaningful learning compared with those who used elaborative concept mapping as a learning tool.1 wkUndergraduates
Various testing formats can enhance learning
“Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests” (Smith and Karpicke, 2014) See above.See above.See above.See above.
“Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention” (Kang et al., 2007) What effect does the type of question used for retrieval practice have on retention? Does feedback have an effect on retention for different types of questions?When no feedback was given, the difference in long-term retention between short-answer and multiple-choice questions was insignificant. When feedback was provided, short-answer questions were slightly more beneficial.3 dUndergraduates, Washington University psychology subjects’ pool
“The persisting benefits of using multiple-choice tests as learning events” (Little and Bjork, 2012) What effect does question format have on retention of information previously tested and related information not included in retrieval practice?Both cued-recall and multiple-choice questions improved recall compared with the no-test control. However, multiple-choice questions improved recall more than cued-recall questions for information not included in the retrieval practice, both after a 5-min and a 48-h delay.48 hUndergraduates, University of California, Los Angeles
Feedback enhances benefits of testing
“Feedback enhances positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing” (Butler and Roediger, 2008) What effect does feedback on multiple-choice tests have on long-term retention of information?Feedback improved retention on a final cued-recall test. Delayed feedback resulted in better final performance than immediate feedback, though both showed benefits compared with no feedback. The final test occurred 1 wk after the initial test.1 wkUndergraduate psychology students, Washington University
“Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence responses” (Butler et al., 2008) What role does feedback play in retrieval practice? Can it correct metacognitive errors as well as memory errors?Both initially correct and incorrect answers were benefited by feedback, but low-confidence answers were most benefited by feedback.5 minUndergraduate psychology students, Washington University
Learning is not limited to rote memory
“Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative study with concept mapping” (Karpicke and Blunt, 2011) What is the effect of retrieval practice on learning relative to elaborative study using a concept map? Does retrieval practice improve students’ ability to perform higher-order cognitive activities (i.e., building a concept map) as well as simple recall tasks?Compared with elaborative study using concept mapping, retrieval practice improved students’ performance both on final tests that required short answers and final tests that required concept map production. See also earlier entry for this study.1 wkUndergraduates
“Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests” (Smith and Karpicke, 2014) See above.See above.See above.See above.
“Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying” (Butler, 2010) Does test-enhanced learning promote transfer of facts and concepts from one domain to another?Testing improved retention and increased transfer of information from one domain to another through test questions that required factual or conceptual recall and inferential questions that required transfer.1 wkUndergraduate psychology students, Washington University
Testing potentiates further study
“Pretesting with multiple-choice questions facilitates learning” (Little and Bjork, 2011) Does pretesting using multiple-choice questions improve performance on a later test? Is an effect observed only for pretested information or also for related, previously untested information?A multiple-choice pretest improved performance on a final test, both for information that was included on the pretest and related information.1 wkUndergraduates, University of California, Los Angeles
“The interim test effect: testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material” (Wissman et al., 2011) Does an interim test over previously learned material improve retention of subsequently learned material?Interim testing improves recall on a final test for information taught before and after the interim test.No delayUndergraduates, Kent State University
The benefits of testing appear to extend to the classroom
“The exam-a-day procedure improves performance in psychology classes” (Leeming, 2002) What effect does a daily exam have on retention at the end of the semester?Students who took a daily exam in an undergraduate psychology class scored higher on a retention test at the end of the course and had higher average grades than students who only took unit tests.One semesterUndergraduates enrolled in Summer term of Introductory Psychology, University of Memphis
“Repeated testing improves long-term retention relative to repeated study: a randomized controlled trial” (Larsen et al., 2009) Does repeated testing improve long-term retention in a real learning environment?In a study with medical residents, repeated testing with feedback improved retention more than repeated study for a final recall test 6 mo later.6 moResidents from Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine programs, Washington University
“Retrieving essential material at the end of lectures improves performance on statistics exams” (Lyle and Crawford, 2011) What effect does daily recall practice using the PUREMEM method have on course exam scores?In an undergraduate psychology course, students using the PUREMEM method had higher exams scores than students taught with traditional lectures, assessed by four noncumulative exams spaced evenly throughout the semester.∼3.5 wkUndergraduates enrolled in either of two consecutive years of Statistics for Psychology, University of Louisville
“Using quizzes to enhance summative-assessment performance in a web-based class: an experimental study” (McDaniel et al., 2012) What effects do online testing resources have on retention of information in an online undergraduate neuroscience course?Both multiple-choice and short-answer quiz questions improved retention and improved scores on the final exam for questions identical to those on the weekly quizzes and those that were related but not identical.15 wkUndergraduates enrolled in Web-based brain and behavior course
“Increasing student success using online quizzing in introductory (majors) biology” (Orr and Foster, 2013) What effect do required pre-exam quizzes have on final exam scores for students in an introductory (major) biology course?Students were required to complete 10 pre-exam quizzes throughout the semester. The scores of students who completed all of the quizzes or none of the quizzes were compared. Students of all abilities who completed all of the pre-exam quizzes had higher average exam scores than those who completed none.One semesterCommunity college students enrolled in an introductory biology course for majors
“Teaching students how to study: a workshop on information processing and self-testing helps students learn” (Stanger-Hall et al., 2011) What effect does a self-testing exercise done in a workshop have on final exam questions covering the same topic used in the workshop?Students who participated in the retrieval-practice workshop performed better on the exam questions related to the material covered in the workshop activity. However, there was no difference in overall performance on the exam between the two groups.10 wkUndergraduate students in a introductory biology class
Open in a separate window  相似文献   
32.
Editorial: Continuity and Change in Child Development          下载免费PDF全文
Cynthia Garcia Coll 《Child development》2015,86(1):7-9
  相似文献   
33.
THE BULLYING DYNAMIC: PREVALENCE OF INVOLVEMENT AMONG A LARGE‐SCALE SAMPLE OF MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL YOUTH WITH AND WITHOUT DISABILITIES     
Chad A. Rose  Cynthia G. Simpson  Aaron Moss 《Psychology in the schools》2015,52(5):515-531
Bullying has been the topic of much debate and empirical investigations over the past decade. Contemporary literature contends that students with disabilities may be overrepresented within the bullying dynamic as both perpetrators and victims. Unfortunately, prevalence rates associated with the representation of students with disabilities is limited due to measurement, disability status identification, and definition issues. The present study attempted to address these issues by assessing the prevalence rates of specific subgroups of students with disabilities in a large‐scale cross‐sectional study with 13,325 students without disabilities and 1,183 students with disabilities in Grades 6 through 12. Results suggest that overall, students with disabilities reported proportionally higher rates of bullying, fighting, relational aggression, victimization, online victimization, and relational victimization than did their peers without disabilities. These findings suggest that schools must begin to establish targeted interventions to support skill development based on characteristics associated with specific disability identification.  相似文献   
34.
Exploring kindergarten teachers’ classroom practices and beliefs in writing     
Guo  Ying  Puranik  Cynthia  Dinnesen  Megan Schneider  Hall  Anna H. 《Reading and writing》2022,35(2):457-478
  相似文献   
35.
Changes in children’s anger,sadness, and persistence across blocked goals: Implications for self-regulation     
Lin Tan  Eunkyung Shin  Kenyon Page  Cynthia L. Smith 《Child development》2023,94(2):411-423
The current study took a person-centered approach to examine the heterogeneity of changes in children’s emotions and persistence during a goal-blocking task and examined how different profiles of emotions and persistence related to children’s self-regulation. Children’s anger, sadness, and persistence were rated in a goal-blocking task in toddlerhood (T1; N = 140, 72 boys, Mage = 2.67 years, 90.7% White) and preschool (T2). Children’s self-regulation, specifically sustained attention and engagement, was assessed at T1, T2, and early school-age (T3) from 2005 to 2012. Growth mixture modeling revealed two classes of children at T1 and three classes at T2 with different patterns of anger, sadness, and persistence. Children’s classification at T2, but not T1, significantly predicted their sustained attention and engagement both concurrently and longitudinally.  相似文献   
36.
DEVELOPING AND USING INTERDISCIPLINARY CASE STUDIES IN TEACHING GERIATRICS TO PRACTICING HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS     
Norma J. Owens  Cynthia A. Padula  Anne L. Hume 《Educational gerontology》2013,39(6):473-489
Continuing education programs for health care professionals who practice in geriatrics are an important part of improving the health care provided to older adults. Programs utilizing active forms of learning that mimic the clinical environment are more successful at changing the behavior of health care professionals than traditional didactic styles of teaching. Problem-based learning methods allow learners to identify their own areas of strength and weakness and to work toward improvement in a manner best suited to their needs. This article describes an interdisciplinary team of educator-clinicians in geriatrics who developed clinical case studies embodying these approaches as one method of improving the learning process for adult health care providers. An actual sample case study is presented as an illustration of the principles embodied in this process. Lessons learned from the development and use of these case studies are summarized in the context of improving the quality of continuing education programs for health care professionals in geriatric practice.  相似文献   
37.
Children's views about encountering a variety of foreign languages in the primary school     
Cynthia Martin 《Education 3-13》2013,41(1):52-57
  相似文献   
38.
Audio Computer-Based Tests (CBTs): An Initial Framework for the Use of Sound in Computerized Tests     
Cynthia G. Parshall  Sha Balizet 《Educational Measurement》2001,20(2):5-15
Are there important aspects of human ability that we have not been measuring? What are the purposes and types of audio that are possible in computerized tests? Will the use of audio in computer‐based tests lead to more valid and reliable measurement?  相似文献   
39.
Changing leadership: Teachers lead the way for schools that learn     
Monica Taylor  Jennifer Goeke  Emily Klein  Cynthia Onore  Kristi Geist 《Teaching and Teacher Education》2011,27(5):920-929
This paper presents findings from a three-year, qualitative study of teachers enrolled in a Masters of Teacher Leadership program. Researchers sought to understand the ways teachers’ beliefs about and understandings of teacher leadership were affected by their participation in a formal teacher leadership program, as well as the kinds of actions they took up as a result of this participation. Data indicate three significant ways participants’ work as teacher leaders was developed and enhanced, including: (a) identifying and amplifying their professional voice, (b) deepening and extending their voice as they plan, and (c) reframing their work/shift responsibility through constructing widening circles of influence and impact. Authors identify implications of their research for growing teacher leaders, school improvement and change, changing school culture, enhancing student engagement, and building new structures.  相似文献   
40.
Contributions of Emergent Literacy Skills to Name Writing, Letter Writing, and Spelling in Preschool Children     
Puranik CS  Lonigan CJ  Kim YS 《Early childhood research quarterly》2011,26(4):465-474
The purpose of this study was to examine which emergent literacy skills contribute to preschool children's emergent writing (name-writing, letter-writing, and spelling) skills. Emergent reading and writing tasks were administered to 296 preschool children aged 4-5 years. Print knowledge and letter-writing skills made positive contributions to name writing; whereas alphabet knowledge, print knowledge, and name writing made positive contributions to letter writing. Both name-writing and letter-writing skills made significant contributions to the prediction of spelling after controlling for age, parental education, print knowledge, phonological awareness, and letter-name and letter-sound knowledge; however, only letter-writing abilities made a significant unique contribution to the prediction of spelling when both letter-writing and name-writing skills were considered together. Name writing reflects knowledge of some letters rather than a broader knowledge of letters that may be needed to support early spelling. Children's letter-writing skills may be a better indicator of children's emergent literacy and developing spelling skills than are their name-writing skills at the end of the preschool year. Spelling is a developmentally complex skill beginning in preschool and includes letter writing and blending skills, print knowledge, and letter-name and letter-sound knowledge.  相似文献   
[首页] « 上一页 [1] [2] [3] 4 [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] 下一页 » 末  页»
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号