排序方式: 共有30条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Determining the size of museum subsidies 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
Fernand Martin 《Journal of Cultural Economics》1994,18(4):255-270
The justification of a subsidy relies upon the museum's soical value which consists in its use value, its non-use value, and in its externalities. The estimation of these values is based on the consumer sovereignty expressed by the net cash revenues of the museum, the consumer surplus, positive externalities and the willingness to pay taxes. The paper measures these sources of value by the travel cost and contingent valuation methods and by special computations of externalities. The particular museum, used in this paper as a case study, seems to pass the test, i.e, its subsidies do not exceed its social value. 相似文献
18.
19.
The purpose of this article is to show how costs and benefits of geographical decentralization of R&D can be identified and compared. The benefits for the region that receives R&D activities are studied in section 2. They stem from the short-run multiplier effect, the amelioration of human capital and the possible modernization of the local industrial structure. On the cost side examined in section 3, the observable impacts of the decentralization of R&D concern the loss of returns to scale and urban economies of the production of the R&D output. It is shown, in section 4, that the flows of costs and benefits must be discounted by the social cost of capital. The main conclusion of this article is that the decentralization of R&D in a large, sparsely populated country entails social costs and this would weaken its competitive position in world commerce. On the other hand, the issue of decentralization is more crucial for small countries (in terms of population and economic size) than for large ones, like the U.S., where critical masses of research efforts can be simultaneously attained in many fields and in many places. 相似文献
20.
Denis G. Osborne C. H. Dobinson William Taylor Edmund King John B. Biggs J. M. Tanner Philip E. Vernon M. J. Langeveld Malcolm Skilbeck Mary Jean Bowman Donald E. Super Fernand Hotyat A. N. Oppenheim Sinai Ucko Peter Seidmann 《International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation》1966,12(1):100-125