全文获取类型
收费全文 | 80篇 |
免费 | 0篇 |
专业分类
教育 | 64篇 |
科学研究 | 4篇 |
体育 | 1篇 |
信息传播 | 11篇 |
出版年
2022年 | 3篇 |
2020年 | 1篇 |
2017年 | 3篇 |
2016年 | 3篇 |
2013年 | 13篇 |
2010年 | 1篇 |
2005年 | 2篇 |
2000年 | 1篇 |
1999年 | 1篇 |
1998年 | 1篇 |
1996年 | 2篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
1992年 | 1篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1988年 | 1篇 |
1986年 | 3篇 |
1985年 | 4篇 |
1984年 | 3篇 |
1983年 | 5篇 |
1982年 | 1篇 |
1980年 | 2篇 |
1979年 | 2篇 |
1978年 | 3篇 |
1977年 | 4篇 |
1976年 | 4篇 |
1975年 | 4篇 |
1974年 | 5篇 |
1973年 | 2篇 |
1963年 | 1篇 |
1962年 | 1篇 |
1833年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有80条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
11.
Eric Haas 《Peabody Journal of Education》2013,88(1):63-102
This study explores the use and presentation of information and research on education by the news media. Using content analysis, this study compares four types of think tanks—contract research, academic, advocacy, and mixed academic and advocacy—and shows how the news media represented each one as a source of research, facts, and figures on education. The findings from this study show that the news media presented all the think tanks as credible sources of research, facts, and figures on education, regardless of the extent to which each think tank emphasized policy and political advocacy over the professional norms of academic research. 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
ABSTRACT The Klarchek Information Commons is a collaboration between Loyola University Libraries and Information Technology Services (ITS). The Information Commons has been open almost 2 years and was in the planning stages for almost 2 years before its grand opening in January 2008. During that period the library and ITS have learned how to work together to successfully operate this new service hub on campus. In this article, the authors look at the challenges faced by the two groups and how they resolved problems and faced the challenges inherent in running a large, complex, service-oriented organization. 相似文献
19.
20.
Are variations in test-preparation practices from school to school undermining the meaningfulness of achievement test results? Is there pressure to raise achievement test scores by the use of educationally unsound practices? What uses of achievement test scores are most common? Do teachers and administrators have reasonably accurate views of test score uses? 相似文献