全文获取类型
收费全文 | 987篇 |
免费 | 12篇 |
专业分类
教育 | 788篇 |
科学研究 | 34篇 |
各国文化 | 35篇 |
体育 | 63篇 |
综合类 | 1篇 |
文化理论 | 6篇 |
信息传播 | 72篇 |
出版年
2021年 | 4篇 |
2020年 | 17篇 |
2019年 | 30篇 |
2018年 | 53篇 |
2017年 | 44篇 |
2016年 | 28篇 |
2015年 | 21篇 |
2014年 | 25篇 |
2013年 | 245篇 |
2012年 | 25篇 |
2011年 | 26篇 |
2010年 | 26篇 |
2009年 | 42篇 |
2008年 | 30篇 |
2007年 | 26篇 |
2006年 | 25篇 |
2005年 | 20篇 |
2004年 | 23篇 |
2003年 | 26篇 |
2002年 | 9篇 |
2001年 | 14篇 |
2000年 | 18篇 |
1999年 | 13篇 |
1998年 | 18篇 |
1997年 | 9篇 |
1996年 | 10篇 |
1995年 | 12篇 |
1994年 | 16篇 |
1993年 | 3篇 |
1992年 | 13篇 |
1991年 | 13篇 |
1990年 | 12篇 |
1989年 | 14篇 |
1988年 | 12篇 |
1987年 | 9篇 |
1986年 | 8篇 |
1985年 | 8篇 |
1984年 | 7篇 |
1983年 | 7篇 |
1982年 | 5篇 |
1981年 | 2篇 |
1980年 | 3篇 |
1979年 | 3篇 |
1978年 | 2篇 |
1977年 | 4篇 |
1976年 | 3篇 |
1973年 | 3篇 |
1939年 | 1篇 |
1929年 | 1篇 |
1868年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有999条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
151.
152.
Manuel Jiménez Raya 《Educational Media International》2013,50(3-4):305-317
This paper discusses the professional development of primary modern language teachers through the use of new technologies. It explores the principles upon which the development of a multimedia learning environment (FLiP – Foreign Languages in Primary) was constructed. These entail principles of effective modern‐language teaching, principles of teacher education, and a conception of the effective teacher. In addition, ways in which technology can support the principles of effective professional development are discussed. Information technology can be extremely empowering, extremely motivating and extremely conducive to creating new and exciting teacher‐education environments. The most outstanding contribution is that multimedia environments can make teachers look beyond the immediate context thanks to the incorporation of indirect observation.Les multimédias dans la formation des enseignants en langues étrangères. Cet article discute le d´eveloppement professionnel des enseignants du primaire en langues modernes, grâce à l'utilisation des nouvelles technologies. Il explore les principes selon lesquels le développement d'un environnement multimédia a été construit (FLIP - Foreign Languages in Primary). Ils impliquent les principes de l'enseignement efficace des langues modernes, les principes de la formation des maîtres, et une conception du maître efficace. De plus, les façons dont la technologie vont soutenir les principes d'un développement efficace sont discutées. La technologie de l'information peut être très puissante, très motivante pour créer des nouveaux environnements excitants pour la formation des maîtres. La plus importante contribution est que les environnement mulitimédia amènent les maîtres à regarder au delà du contexte immédiat grâce à l'incorporation de l'observation indirecte.Multimedia in der Ausbildung von Lehrern für neue Sprachen. Dieses Papier erörtert die professionelle Entwicklung von Material zur Ausbildung von Grundstufenlehrern für moderne Sprachen durch die Verwendung neuer Technologien. Es vermittelt die Prinzipien, auf denen die Entwicklung einer Multimedia Lernumgebung ('FLIP - Foreign Languages in Primary') aufgebaut wurde. Diese enthalten Prinzipien modernen Sprachunterrichts, Prinzipien von Lehrerbildung und ein Konzept des 'wirksamen' Lehrers. Außerdem wird diskutiert, welche Technik die Prinzipien wirksamer professioneller Entwicklung unterstützen kann. Die Nutzung von Informationstechnologie kann extrem verstärkend, extrem motivierend und äußerst dienlich sein, neue und aufregende Möglichkeiten für die Lehrerbildung.zu schaffen. Der hervorragendste Beitrag ist, daß Multimediaumgebungen es Lehrern ermöglichen können, sich öber den unmittelbaren Kontext durch die Integration indirekter Beobachtung zu informieren. 相似文献
153.
Jim Callan 《Irish Educational Studies》2013,32(2):307-324
154.
155.
Jiménez JE del Rosario Ortiz M Rodrigo M Hernández-Valle I Ramírez G Estévez A O'Shanahan I de la Luz Trabaue M 《Journal of learning disabilities》2003,36(1):34-47
This study was designed to assess whether the effects of computer-assisted practice on visual word recognition differed for children with reading disabilities (RD) with or without aptitude-achievement discrepancy. A sample of 73 Spanish children with low reading performance was selected using the discrepancy method, based on a standard score comparison (i.e., the difference between IQ and achievement standard scores). The sample was classified into three groups: (1) a group of 14 children with dyslexia (age M = 103.85 months; SD = 8.45) who received computer-based reading practice; (2) a group of 31 "garden-variety" (GV) poor readers (age M = 107.06 months; SD = 6.75) who received the same type of instruction; and (3) a group of 28 children with low reading performance (age M = 103.33 months; SD = 9.04) who did not receive computer-assisted practice. Children were pre- and posttested in word recognition, reading comprehension, phonological awareness, and visual and phonological tasks. The results indicated that both computer-assisted intervention groups showed improved word recognition compared to the control group. Nevertheless, children with dyslexia had more difficulties than GV poor readers during computer-based word reading under conditions that required extensive phonological computation, because their performance was more affected by low-frequency words and long words. In conclusion, we did not find empirical evidence in favor of the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability, because IQ did not differentially predict treatment outcomes. 相似文献
156.
157.
Justification and Persuasion about Cloning: Arguments in Hwang’s Paper and Journalistic Reported Versions 总被引:4,自引:4,他引:0
María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre Marta Federico-Agraso 《Research in Science Education》2009,39(3):331-347
We examine the argumentative structure of Hwang et al.’s (2004) paper about human somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT, or ‘therapeutic cloning’), contrasted with four Journalistic Reported
Versions (JRV) of it, and with students’ summaries of one JRV. As the evaluation of evidence is one of the critical features
of argumentation (Jiménez-Aleixandre 2008), the analysis focuses on the use of evidence, drawing from instruments to analyze written argumentation (Kelly et al. 2008) and from studies about the structure of empirical research reports (Swales 2001). The objectives are: 1) To examine the use of evidence and the argumentative structure of Hwang et al.’s Science, 303: 1669–1674 (2004) original paper in terms of the criteria: a) pertinence of the evidence presented to the claims; b) sufficiency of the evidence
for the purpose of supporting the claims; and c) coordination of the evidence across epistemic levels. 2) To explore how the
structure of Hwang’s paper translates into the JRV and into university students’ perceptions about the evidence supporting
the claims. The argumentative structure of Hwang’s paper is such that its apparently ostensible main claim about NT constitutes
a justification for a second claim about its therapeutic applications, for which no evidence is offered. However, this second
claim receives prominent treatment in the JRV and in the students’ summaries. Implications for promoting critical reading
in the classroom are discussed. 相似文献
158.
Supporting Teaching and Learning Using Authentic Scientific Texts: A Rejoinder to Danielle J. Ford 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
Anat Yarden Hedda Falk Marta Federico-Agraso María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre Stephen P. Norris Linda M. Phillips 《Research in Science Education》2009,39(3):391-395
In her commentary Danielle J. Ford mainly focused on three issues that highlight the promises and challenges for the use of
Adapted Primary Literature (APL) in science curricula: the possible contribution of APL to authentic experiences in secondary
schools, implementation issues of APL including the support required for the teachers, and the possibilities to extend the
use of APL to younger and older students. In this rejoinder, we first offer some general comments on Ford’s commentary. Then
we offer more specific comments on two areas of her response, authenticity and the support for teachers. 相似文献
159.
Tanya Beran Claudio Violato Don Kline Jim Frideres 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2009,34(5):519-527
Although measures of student ratings of instruction have been developed and examined empirically, students' attitudes about the utility of these ratings have yet to be meaningfully quantified. Using survey responses from 1229 students at a major Canadian university, we developed a psychometrically sound measure of the usefulness of student ratings. A principal components analysis with oblique rotation was conducted and three factors (Instructor characteristics, Course characteristics and Instructor's relative ranking) were obtained that explained 64% of the variance in six iterations. The usefulness of these three types of ratings information differs according to several student and course characteristics. The present results provide evidence for both reliability and validity of the instrument as an indicator of the utility of teaching evaluation for students. 相似文献
160.