马拉松赛事风险政府协调治理的理论内涵、现实困境与实现路径

研究以政府协调治理为理论基础,以“主体-场景-行动”为治理逻辑的分析框架,指出马拉松赛事风险治理的困境,提出马拉松赛事风险政府协调治理的实现路径。研究认为,马拉松赛事风险治理存在治理主体对赛事风险治理认识不够、赛事风险场景的精细划分比较笼统、赛事风险应急合作治理行动的基础支撑条件不完善等困境。应从更新治理理念、转变治理主体的角色认识,优化场景划分、夯实场景的精细化和数字化;强化行动效益,夯实赛事风险治理的行动基础3个方面推进治理。     

Self-regulation of timeout duration in the modification of disruptive classroom behavior

The effects of self-determination vs. teacher-determination of timeout duration on disruptive behavior were investigated in a group of 15 students in a special classroom who had learning disabilities and/or behavior problems. There were five phases to the study: In a repeated measures design each subject received timeout for 5 minutes, no timeout, 5 minutes timeout, selfdetermined timeout duration, and student = teacher-determined timeout duration. The overall effect of timeout was to reduce significantly the rate of disruptive behavior. The effects of various timeout conditions did not differ, indicating self-management of timeout duration was just as effective as when the teacher set the timeout duration.     

A comparative study of three methods for the popularization of a physical phenomenon

A study of Norwegian science textbooks for grade 8 indicates an individualistic image of science where individual scientists are discovering truth, through experiment. Scientific rationality is grounded in procedures of inquiry alone and not in debate and argumentation within scientific communities. The communal aspects of science tend to become visible in historical examples where science did not function properly due to prejudices or ignorance. Furthermore, science proper and school science are not differentiated between, and 'scientific knowledge about nature' and 'nature' are one and the same. The discourse identified is well suited to provide students with broad and general knowledge about natural and everyday phenomena. However, it is less suitable for teaching about the scientific enterprise in contemporary society. This is worrying for students' scientific literacy as future adults, as this dimension is essential for understanding the nature of science and for democratic citizenship in socio-scientific issues.