排序方式: 共有36条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
31.
Alexandre Vexliard Gordon Bishop Sinai Ucko Ingvar Werdelin Eric Hoyle Horst Magdeburg W. D. Halls Oskar Anweiler William W. Brickman R. Murray Thomas Edmund King Robert F. Lawson Anton Bemmerlein Gilbert L. de Landsheere H. H. Stern Klaus Schüttler-Janikulla Ben Morris Sherman D. Spector David A. Walker Robert J. Meeker Franklin Parker Joseph Majault Nigel Grant Rolland G. Paulston John B. Biggs Klaus Meyer 《International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation》1971,17(3):343-380
32.
33.
Sinai Ucko Gert Otto M. J. Langeveld H. H. Stern Oskar Anweiler C. H. Dobinson Helmut Meyer-Bothling Jürgen Zabeck Heinrich Abel Hans Kirchhoff Rudolf Haas Heinrich Roth Lotte Schenk-Danzinger J. M. Tanner Barbara Magierska 《International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation》1962,7(4):487-510
34.
Oskar Anweiler 《International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation》1960,6(1):478-482
Ohne ZusammenfassungVgl. den Bericht in Heft 1/1960, S. 116 ff. dieser Zeitschrift. 相似文献
35.
Oskar Anweiler 《International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation》1961,7(3):342-347
Ohne ZusammenfassungVgl. die voraufgegangenen Berichte, VI/1960, S. 116 ff., S. 478 ff. 相似文献
36.
Associative learning theories assume that cue interaction and, specifically, retrospective revaluation occur only when the target cue is previously trained in compound with the to-be-revalued cue. However, there are recent demonstrations of retrospective revaluation in the absence of compound training (e.g., Matute &; Pineño, 1998a, 1998b). Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to assume that cue interaction should be stronger when the cues are trained together than when they are trained apart. In two experiments with humans, we directly compared compound and elemental training of cues. The results showed that retrospective revaluation in the elemental condition can be as strong as and, sometimes, stronger than that in the compound condition. This suggests that within-compound associations are not necessary for retrospective revaluation to occur and that these effects can possibly be best understood in the framework of general interference theory. 相似文献