Carr and Kemmis's Reflections

Reflective practice in general, and the views of Carr and Kemmis on 'action research' in particular, have become the settled orthodoxy of much educational thinking, but can they take the load that they are being asked to bear? An analysis of 'reflection' is offered, which reveals what can be achieved by the operation and what cannot. This is then used to assess the coherence of Kemmis's views on the concept—the basis of Carr and Kemmis's widely-cited theoretical proposals, which they use to justify their approach to action research. I then turn to an examination of the adequacy of these proposals themselves.     

低氧暴露后提高平原运动能力的非血液学机制

在过去五十多年中,高原训练常被应用于优秀耐力运动员,旨在提高其平原的运动能力.大多研究认为,高原适应的优势主要集中在血液学方面,即提主平原运动能力的主要机制是高原环境下氧气利用下降激发红细胞生成加速反应,从而起红细胞量、 VO2max和竞技能力的提高.     

“Where’s the beef?”: A reply to Heinich

The following is an unsolicited reaction by Richard Clark to the article “The Proper Study of Instructional Technology” by Robert Heinich that was published as the ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper in the Summer 1984 issue of this journal.     

African healing and western psychotherapy: Meetings between professionalsGuérison Africaine et Psychothérapie Occidentale: Rencontres entre ProfessionnelsCuración Africana y Psicoterapia Occidental: Reuniones entre Profesionales

The institutions of traditional healing, as practiced in Black Africa, and psychotherapy, as practiced in Western culture, are compared in terms of their relative positions within the broader health care systems of the respective cultures, and in terms of their therapeutic techniques. Data is based on personal work experience in East Africa 10 years ago and on eight recent interviews with mental health professionals and healers in West Africa. (The author is an American-trained clinical psychologist.) It is concluded that these two institutions carry on the same function in their respective cultures, but differ in format according to the different dominant family configurations of the two cultures.     

Racial stereotypes revisited

Fifty-one black and 66 white college students were administered the Katz and Braly Checklist (1933) and instructed to select five adjectives that best described first themselves, second, black Americans, and third, white Americans. They then rated each adjective on a favorability scale from 1 to 5. Changes in the content of stereotypes were determined by calculating the 10 most frequently checked adjectives for black and for white Americans and comparing that with data from Katz and Braly (1933), Bayton (1941) and Maykovich (1972). Currently, black Americans are described as musical, loyal to family ties, very religious, progressive, ambitious, and quick-tempered. White Americans are described as intelligent, materialistic, ambitious, industrious, conventional, and conservative. The content of the white stereotype remained more stable over the years than the black stereotype. The white stereotype has slowly decreased in favorability over the years while the black stereotype has increased. Black and white students rated themselves more favorably than they rated the other or their own race.