首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   849篇
  免费   26篇
教育   619篇
科学研究   27篇
各国文化   67篇
体育   47篇
文化理论   9篇
信息传播   106篇
  2024年   3篇
  2023年   8篇
  2022年   19篇
  2021年   14篇
  2020年   40篇
  2019年   42篇
  2018年   55篇
  2017年   68篇
  2016年   51篇
  2015年   30篇
  2014年   49篇
  2013年   205篇
  2012年   23篇
  2011年   22篇
  2010年   26篇
  2009年   22篇
  2008年   14篇
  2007年   23篇
  2006年   14篇
  2005年   13篇
  2004年   10篇
  2003年   9篇
  2002年   12篇
  2001年   6篇
  2000年   6篇
  1999年   9篇
  1998年   11篇
  1997年   7篇
  1996年   2篇
  1995年   10篇
  1994年   6篇
  1993年   5篇
  1991年   3篇
  1990年   3篇
  1989年   5篇
  1986年   2篇
  1985年   4篇
  1983年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1981年   2篇
  1980年   2篇
  1979年   2篇
  1978年   2篇
  1977年   1篇
  1975年   1篇
  1974年   2篇
  1973年   1篇
  1970年   3篇
  1968年   2篇
  1967年   2篇
排序方式: 共有875条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
871.
Research Findings: Data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–1999, were used to examine the relation between parenting, sociodemographic characteristics, and school readiness among (N = 1,136) African American boys in kindergarten. Parenting was defined as parenting style (i.e., warmth and control), home learning stimulation, and culturally relevant parenting. Two child outcomes previously linked to school readiness were examined: kindergarten reading and approaches to learning. Hierarchical regression analyses were performed to address 2 research questions. First, does parenting predict kindergarten reading above and beyond the contribution of sociodemographic characteristics? Second, does parenting predict kindergarten approaches to learning above and beyond the contribution of sociodemographic characteristics? Practice or Policy: Children with parents who set consistent bedtimes, provided more books in their homes, and read to them more frequently had better kindergarten reading scores after socioeconomic status, environmental safety, and maternal education were controlled. Similarly, children with parents who provided more books in their home and read to their children more frequently had more positive teacher-rated approaches to learning scores in kindergarten. Implications for future research are discussed.  相似文献   
872.
873.
This paper discusses a three-level model that synthesizes and unifies existing learning theories to model the roles of artificial intelligence (AI) in promoting learning processes. The model, drawn from developmental psychology, computational biology, instructional design, cognitive science, complexity and sociocultural theory, includes a causal learning mechanism that explains how learning occurs and works across micro, meso and macro levels. The model also explains how information gained through learning is aggregated, or brought together, as well as dissipated, or released and used within and across the levels. Fourteen roles for AI in education are proposed, aligned with the model's features: four roles at the individual or micro level, four roles at the meso level of teams and knowledge communities and six roles at the macro level of cultural historical activity. Implications for research and practice, evaluation criteria and a discussion of limitations are included. Armed with the proposed model, AI developers can focus their work with learning designers, researchers and practitioners to leverage the proposed roles to improve individual learning, team performance and building knowledge communities.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic
  • Numerous learning theories exist with significant cross-over of concepts, duplication and redundancy in terms and structure that offer partial explanations of learning.
  • Frameworks concerning learning have been offered from several disciplines such as psychology, biology and computer science but have rarely been integrated or unified.
  • Rethinking learning theory for the age of artificial intelligence (AI) is needed to incorporate computational resources and capabilities into both theory and educational practices.
What this paper adds
  • A three-level theory (ie, micro, meso and macro) of learning that synthesizes and unifies existing theories is proposed to enhance computational modelling and further develop the roles of AI in education.
  • A causal model of learning is defined, drawing from developmental psychology, computational biology, instructional design, cognitive science and sociocultural theory, which explains how learning occurs and works across the levels.
  • The model explains how information gained through learning is aggregated, or brought together, as well as dissipated, or released and used within and across the levels.
  • Fourteen roles for AI in education are aligned with the model's features: four roles at the individual or micro level, four roles at the meso level of teams and knowledge communities and six roles at the macro level of cultural historical activity.
Implications for practice and policy
  • Researchers may benefit from referring to the new theory to situate their work as part of a larger context of the evolution and complexity of individual and organizational learning and learning systems.
  • Mechanisms newly discovered and explained by future researchers may be better understood as contributions to a common framework unifying the scientific understanding of learning theory.
  相似文献   
874.
875.
  • Inclusive language will make scholarly publishing more accurate and more respectful, and it has the potential to help authors reach a wider audience.
  • JAMA and the JAMA Network journals, the American Chemical Society and the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications have free guides on inclusive language, formatting and images.
  • The guides provide principles and rationale, as well as examples of preferred language, in order to equip people with knowledge to choose the most inclusive words even as terminology preferences change.
  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号