从鲁迅杂文看当下杂文形象性的缺失

杂文是融政论性和艺术性于一体的文艺性社会论文,文学性或日形象性是其重要的特征.鲁迅杂文在勾勒形象、托物寓理、以事晓理和画龙点睛等方面充分显示了形象性.本文据此剖析当下杂文在形象性缺失方面存在的问题:通篇论述,形象不足;以理说理,直陈乏味;就事论事,画龙少睛;表达单一,语言枯燥.     

分类检索语言的断言与非断言性--从标引中的两个实例谈起

知识的微分化和科学概念内涵的衍化只是扯外部提供了一些发展空间，分类法的断言性完全可以将它们消化在近缘的类和不同的种中。因此，断言惟为分类法提供了一个稳定的状态，使分类法能在一个时期内发挥分类检索的作用。分类法中，一个个类目组成一个个集合住标引时先于文献而抽象地存在着。每当新元素添加进集合中，这个集合都要被修正。此时，这些元素将不再处于合适的类目内，而且必须移动它们。显然分类法还存在着非断言性，分类法的发展动力来自分类法自身的非断言性。     

图书馆综合布线工程的验收

综合布线系统是智能图书馆建筑的基础，为确保其质量，图书馆必须加强对工程质量的检测与验收。提出对综合布线工程的验收应贯穿于工程的所有环节，包括设计图的验收、施工材料和设备的验收、施工质量的验收、施工结束的验收，对工程各环节的验收进行了详细论述。     

数字参考咨询服务的现状和未来发展

论文介绍了国内外数字参考咨询服务的研究现状，分析了数字参考咨询服务的特征，并对数参考咨询服务的发展提出了建议。     

抵制电视低俗化现象

电视传播中的低俗化是一个老问题，也是一个世界范围的问题。从学理层面上说，对低俗问题的批评在电视批评理论中占有重要地位；在实践层面上，这种批评将作为对电视传播的监督和校正长期存在下去。值得我们注意的是，正像经典作家指出的那样，批判的武器不能代替武器的批判。批评低俗化，不能简单停留在道德批评和行政批评的一般意义上，而应当依据历史唯物主义的基本原理．追问低俗化现象背后具有终极意义的经济原因。因为，对于低俗化的批评，不管是侧重于伦理的追问还是学理的批评，只要看到了电视传播的现象背后的市场这支“无形的手”的作用，只要不再局限于单纯的道德愤怒和“纯粹理性批判”，我们就有理由相信，这种批评触及到了要害和实质。一句话，对低俗化的批评，     

基于主题图的非物质文化遗产数字资源整合实证分析

[目的/意义]非物质文化遗产资源具有重要的社会价值,将主题图技术应用于非物质文化遗产数字资源的整合中,能够更好地实现非物质文化遗产数字资源的传承与保护。[方法/过程]在分析非物质文化遗产数字资源的主题、关联关系和资源标引的基础上,构建非物质文化遗产数字资源主题图并实现其可视化。[结果/结论]研究结果显示,主题图技术的应用可以为非物质文化遗产数字资源提供基于语义的整合,并将主题之间的关联直观地展示给用户,为用户提供可视化导航。     

Online Celebrity Bashing: Wrecking Ball or Good for You? Adolescent Girls’ Attitudes Toward the Media and Public Bashing of Miley Cyrus and Selena Gomez

Journalists and readers of celebrity news regularly bash celebrities online, a behavior that is easily accepted among adolescents. This study investigates whether these attitudes of acceptance differ according to the perpetrator of the bashing (media versus public) and the likeability of the involved celebrity (liked versus disliked). Using a vignette study, we examine adolescent girls’ attitudes toward media (journalists’) and public (readers’) bashing of a generally disliked celebrity (Miley Cyrus) and a generally liked celebrity (Selena Gomez). All participants read an identical negative news story (media bashing) and two related negative reader comments (public bashing). Participants were randomly assigned to read this information about either Miley Cyrus or Selena Gomez. Results of a mixed-design ANOVA showed that the girls had less negative attitudes toward media bashing compared with public bashing. Moreover, they more easily accepted the bashing of a disliked celebrity than the bashing of a liked celebrity.     

基于信息使用环境理论的引用行为研究:参考文献分析的视角

目前,学术界多开展引用动机和引文功能的相关研究,但对于引用偏好等引用行为却关注较少。基于Taylor的信息使用环境理论,本研究采用参考文献分析方法,全面揭示了施引者引用行为的特征和影响因素。研究将信息使用环境理论中的前三类要素分别通过学者特征、组织环境及论题进行定义,采用参考文献分析法提取第四类要素;随机抽取论文样本,针对上述四类特征进行编码并通过统计分析探讨影响施引者引用行为的因素。研究发现:学者的年龄、性别、教育水平、学术年龄、职业角色、职称、所属机构的类型和层次以及所从事的研究主题和类型,都能对质量、语种、数量、信息资源类型、论文新旧的引用偏好产生显著影响。研究表明:信息使用环境理论和参考文献分析法在引用行为研究中具有适用性。表4。参考文献47。     

Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019

IntroductionWhile early commenting on studies is seen as one of the advantages of preprints, the type of such comments, and the people who post them, have not been systematically explored.Materials and methodsWe analysed comments posted between 21 May 2015 and 9 September 2019 for 1983 bioRxiv preprints that received only one comment on the bioRxiv website. The comment types were classified by three coders independently, with all differences resolved by consensus.ResultsOur analysis showed that 69% of comments were posted by non-authors (N = 1366), and 31% by the preprints’ authors themselves (N = 617). Twelve percent of non-author comments (N = 168) were full review reports traditionally found during journal review, while the rest most commonly contained praises (N = 577, 42%), suggestions (N = 399, 29%), or criticisms (N = 226, 17%). Authors’ comments most commonly contained publication status updates (N = 354, 57%), additional study information (N = 158, 26%), or solicited feedback for the preprints (N = 65, 11%).ConclusionsOur results indicate that comments posted for bioRxiv preprints may have potential benefits for both the public and the scholarly community. Further research is needed to measure the direct impact of these comments on comments made by journal peer reviewers, subsequent preprint versions or journal publications.