The Elliott Cresson medal

This medal is awarded for discovery or original research adding to the sum of human knowledge, irrespective of commercial value; leading and practical utilizations of discovery; and invention, methods and products embodying substantial elements of leadership in their respective classes, or unsual skill or perfection in their workmanship.     

PREDICTING ACADEMICS VIA BEHAVIOR WITHIN AN ELEMENTARY SAMPLE: AN EVALUATION OF THE SOCIAL,ACADEMIC, AND EMOTIONAL BEHAVIOR RISK SCREENER (SAEBRS)

This study examined the extent to which teacher ratings of student behavior via the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS) predicted academic achievement in math and reading. A secondary purpose was to compare the predictive capacity of three SAEBRS subscales corresponding to social, academic, or emotional domains of behavior. Universal screening was conducted to evaluate 1,058 elementary students’ performance in both reading and math, which were then combined to form a composite estimate of overall academic performance. Results indicated that the SAEBRS composite scale and all three subscales each individually predicted academic performance. Results further indicated that the SAEBRS Academic Behavior subscale was the best predictor of academic performance. Furthermore, the SAEBRS Social Behavior scale was found to function as a net suppressor variable, enhancing the capacity of Academic Behavior to predict academic performance via the suppression of variance irrelevant relative to academic performance. Follow‐up path analyses suggested Academic Behavior also served as a mediating variable, as it partially accounted for the relationship between Social Behavior and academic performance. Implications for educators and limitations of this study are discussed.     

Analyzing children’s computational thinking through embodied interaction with technology: a multimodal perspective

Educational technology research and development - The purpose of this paper is twofold. We first present a methodological framework for the analysis of embodied interaction with technology captured...     

Young Children's Theory of Mind Predicts More Sharing With Friends Over Time

Children (predominantly white and middle class) between 3 and 6 years (M = 55.12 months, N = 145 at Time 1, N = 102 at Time 2) participated in the prosocial choice test at two time points approximately 10 months apart. Children could share with strangers, close friends, nonfriends, and in a control, no recipient condition. Children shared more rewards with friends over time. Age interacted with recipient type such that older children had a higher probability of prosocial allocations toward friends and strangers compared to younger children. Theory of mind (ToM) predicted more prosocial allocations to friends over time, and the youngest children with higher ToM scores showed the largest increase in sharing with friends over time.     

The stability of Koppitz scores on the Bender-Gestalt for reading disabled children

The test-retest reliability of the Bender was examined for a sample comprised of 84 reading disabled children. The time interval between the first and second administrations of the test ranged from 12 to 24 days. The total working time necessary to reproduce the designs was considered along with total Koppitz score and errors of distortion, rotation, integration, and perseveration. The reliability estimated (r = .83) was quite satisfactory, and the estimate for working time (r = .70) was large enough to indicate a relatively stable behavioral dimension. The estimates for errors of distortion (r = .62) and rotation (r = .56) were somewhat smaller. The estimates for integration (r = .33) and perseveration (r = .29) errors were significant but much smaller than those for other scores.     

Some aspects of regional-national scientific relationships in East Africa: a summary

This study of some aspects of regional-national scientific relationships in East Africa focuses on the interplay between the East African Agricultural and Forestry Research Organization (EAAFRO) of the East African Community (EAC) and the national agricultural and forestry research systems of the Partner States which make up the Community - Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania. Recently, regional (in the multi-national sense) cooperation or integration has increasingly been proposed as one way in which small developing countries can utilize their scarce resources in a more effective and efficient manner and thus develop faster. Despite the seeming logic and rationality behind these arguments, however, most attempts to date have either failed or have not lived up to expectations. The first major section of this study covered two exercises. In one, a methodology for ‘objectively’ measuring the direct benefits from EAAFRO and determining how they were distributed among the Partner States was developed and utilized. In the second exercise, a transaction analysis was attempted which covered the professional visits of EAAFRO officers to locations in the Partner States and of visits of national-level representatives to EAAFRO headquarters. The results were then related to distance and national borders in an attempt to see what factors might be influencing these transaction patterns. The second major section of this study focused on the individual national researcher in all Partner States. The primary dependent variable investigated was his general opinion toward EAAFRO, and a set of hypothesized relationships was tested to try and explain that opinion. Independent variables tested included benefits from EAAFRO, opinions toward the EAC, the opinions of relevant national groups toward EAAFRO, proximity to EAAFRO, knowledge about EAAFRO, the race of the national researcher, the extent of personal contact transactions, and the extent to which EAAFRO's work complemented that of the national researcher.