形成内事外事良性互动促进国际交流再上台阶

外事是高校工作的重要组成部分,外事服务于内事.外事以内事为依托,内事通过外事求发展.开展国际交流与合作,要广开渠道,更要苦练内功.唯有如此,才能形成内事外事互联互动,促进学校工作再上台阶.     

《西游证道书》考辨二则

《西游证道书》是清代最早的百回本《西游记》版本,其特有的版本信息对后世影响极大。文章对《西游证道书》中《丘长春真君传》和"唐僧出身"故事的源头文献进行考证辨析,同时揭示其编撰者"移花接木"的行为和动机,以期为《西游记》版本传播研究提供有价值的参考。     

出版物中表格的正确使用

表格在出版物中的运用由来已久,并作为图书的重要体裁之一一直发挥着重要作用.随着社会的不断进步,表格的运用在继承的基础上进行了创新和发展,但也产生了不少问题,如表格不完整、表目设置不当、隶属关系不清等.因此,文章分别从表格的基本知识、常见问题、怎样正确使用等方面入手,系统介绍作为编辑如何使出版物中的表格发挥最大能效,更具科学性.     

数字环境下版权利益失衡及平衡机制的构建

数字技术的广泛运用带来了数字出版产业的迅速发展,数字出版凭借其成本低、传播快、范围广、易获取等优点,已占据出版产业的半壁江山.在数字出版产业迅速发展的同时,频频出现版权纠纷现象,版权人与使用者、传播者的利益平衡被打破,版权利益失衡的现象日益凸显,迫切需要通过知识产权利益平衡机制的制度构建,探索破解之道.     

提高西方经济学课堂教学质量之我见

通过对目前西方经济学课堂教学存在问题的分析与思考，就如何提高课堂教学质量，提出若干建议。     

Breaking up is hard to do: the resilience of the rock group as an organizational form for creating music

Though there is a long tradition of band members quitting the group or taking a hiatus, the rock group as an organization to produce music continues to be both popular and economically viable. The research question addressed in this paper is whether or not it is a good idea to quit or take a hiatus from the group. We begin with a discussion of the framework for understanding why groups are formed and why they may be difficult to keep together. We then discuss differences between groups in the decade of the 1960s versus today. We argue that there is something unique about the output of the group even with the changes in the structure of contracts, compensation, and consumer focus on the artist that explain the resilience of the rock band as an organizational form within which to create music. We compare the charting success of bands that have members leave the group with the charting success of the members who left the group. We identified the groups in five representative years: 1965, 1975, 1985, 1995, and 2005. We then analyzed the entire Billboard Hot 100 charting careers of those groups and the artists who quit those groups. Our main finding is that when charting success is divided equally among members, going solo pays off—there is a clear economic rationale because solo acts have greater average charting success than the original bands they started in. The other ensuing side projects: duos, collaborations, and other groups are not as lucrative as the original bands. These findings are valid for members of charting groups from each of the 5 years examined. Despite the difficulties in keeping a rock band together, there are fewer band breakups today and remaining with the group generally results in a longer and more productive charting career. Thus, the rock group remains an important organization for producing contemporary music. However, there remains a compelling incentive to go solo. Superstars may benefit from solo projects, but for the average, non-superstar group member, in many circumstances it is better for the band to stay together if the income is divided equally.     

Strategic Capacity and Organisational Capabilities: A Challenge for Universities

Are universities able to operate as strategic actors? An organisational sociology based approach supported by a comparative field research project identifies three types of social, cultural and cognitive processes that play a decisive role in building and implementing local capabilities required to mobilise a strategic capacity. The paper identifies how much these processes are present in the four ideal-types of universities defined by crossing their reputation and their metrics-based performance. Such a meso deterministic perspective suggests that universities may position themselves as proactive actors or principals, and not just as agents of national reforms and political demands. Nevertheless, their ability to do it varies according to their type. The paper also explores the implications of such findings for institutional leadership and steering policymakers.     

Unsustainable Growth,Hyper-Competition,and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists’ Work and Lives

There is a crisis of valuation practices in the current academic life sciences, triggered by unsustainable growth and “hyper-competition.” Quantitative metrics in evaluating researchers are seen as replacing deeper considerations of the quality and novelty of work, as well as substantive care for the societal implications of research. Junior researchers are frequently mentioned as those most strongly affected by these dynamics. However, their own perceptions of these issues are much less frequently considered. This paper aims at contributing to a better understanding of the interplay between how research is valued and how young researchers learn to live, work and produce knowledge within academia. We thus analyze how PhD students and postdocs in the Austrian life sciences ascribe worth to people, objects and practices as they talk about their own present and future lives in research. We draw on literature from the field of valuation studies and its interest in how actors refer to different forms of valuation to account for their actions. We explore how young researchers are socialized into different valuation practices in different stages of their growing into science. Introducing the concept of “regimes of valuation” we show that PhD students relate to a wider evaluative repertoire while postdocs base their decisions on one dominant regime of valuing research. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of these findings for the epistemic and social development of the life sciences, and for other scientific fields.     

基于“问题-用户”的网络问答社区专家发现方法研究

[目的/意义] 以网络问答社区为研究对象,提出基于“问题-用户”传播网络的专家发现方法,为建立用户激励机制、完善专家推荐方法提供借鉴。[方法/过程] 通过分析开放问答模式的特点,以“问题”和“用户”为节点、“答题关系”为有向边,构建“问题-用户”权威值传播网络,利用答案质量改进加权的HITS算法。[结果/结论] 提出的算法可以较好地兼顾用户的答题数量与答案质量,能够选择出活跃度高、知识渊博的用户作为专家。