Effects of learning approaches,locus of control,socio-economic status and self-efficacy on academic achievement: a Turkish perspective

In this study the effects of learning approaches, locus of control (LOC), socio-economic status and self-efficacy on undergraduate students in North Cyprus was investigated. Four questionnaires were administered on 99 students in order to collect data regarding the learning approaches, LOC, self-efficacy and demographic factors. High cumulative grade point average and self-efficacy were shown to be an indicator of academic achievement and high self-efficacy was related to the use of deep approach (DA). Students, whose mothers had lower levels of education, were found to also predict academic success. No direct significant relationship between DA and academic achievement was found.     

Grundlagen des Burrows-Wheeler-Kompressionsalgorithmus

Der Burrows-Wheeler-Kompressionsalgorithmus hat als ein universelles Kompressionsverfahren in den letzten Jahren aufgrund seiner hervorragenden Kompressionsraten und hohen Verarbeitungsgeschwindigkeiten eine bemerkenswerte Beachtung erfahren. Das Herzstück des Algorithmus stellt die sogenannte Burrows-Wheeler-Transformation dar. Es handelt sich bei dieser Transformation um eine Permutation der Eingabedaten, welche Zeichen mit ähnlichem Kontext nahe beieinander anordnet. Die Transformation sowie die zugehörige Rücktransformation werden zusammen mit den weiteren Stufen des Algorithmus in einer gegenüber der Standardversion verbesserten Variante vorgestellt und die Ergebnisse mit denen anderer Datenkompressionsalgorithmen verglichen.     

Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?

Peer-feedback content is a core component of peer assessment, but the impact of various contents of feedback is hardly studied. Participants in the study were 89 graduate students who were assigned to four experimental and a control group. Experimental groups received a scenario with concise general (CGF) or elaborated specific (ESF) feedback by a high or low competent peer. ESF by a high competent peer was perceived as more adequate, but led to more negative affect. Students in CGF groups outperformed ESF groups during treatment. Groups with a low competent peer outperformed groups with a high competent peer during the posttest. Feedback perceptions and performance were uncorrelated.