全文获取类型
收费全文 | 834篇 |
免费 | 22篇 |
国内免费 | 2篇 |
专业分类
教育 | 483篇 |
科学研究 | 66篇 |
各国文化 | 33篇 |
体育 | 152篇 |
文化理论 | 8篇 |
信息传播 | 116篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 10篇 |
2022年 | 8篇 |
2021年 | 15篇 |
2020年 | 29篇 |
2019年 | 50篇 |
2018年 | 50篇 |
2017年 | 56篇 |
2016年 | 55篇 |
2015年 | 26篇 |
2014年 | 22篇 |
2013年 | 164篇 |
2012年 | 21篇 |
2011年 | 22篇 |
2010年 | 18篇 |
2009年 | 16篇 |
2008年 | 16篇 |
2007年 | 22篇 |
2006年 | 22篇 |
2005年 | 22篇 |
2004年 | 9篇 |
2003年 | 9篇 |
2002年 | 12篇 |
2001年 | 8篇 |
2000年 | 13篇 |
1999年 | 5篇 |
1998年 | 6篇 |
1997年 | 5篇 |
1996年 | 10篇 |
1995年 | 11篇 |
1994年 | 5篇 |
1993年 | 10篇 |
1992年 | 4篇 |
1991年 | 7篇 |
1990年 | 10篇 |
1989年 | 4篇 |
1988年 | 3篇 |
1987年 | 3篇 |
1986年 | 7篇 |
1984年 | 3篇 |
1982年 | 3篇 |
1981年 | 6篇 |
1978年 | 9篇 |
1977年 | 4篇 |
1976年 | 5篇 |
1975年 | 6篇 |
1972年 | 3篇 |
1969年 | 3篇 |
1968年 | 3篇 |
1964年 | 4篇 |
1957年 | 3篇 |
排序方式: 共有858条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
851.
852.
Today''s optical neuromodulation techniques are rapidly evolving, benefiting from advances in photonics, genetics and materials science. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of the latest optical approaches for neuromodulation. We begin with the physical principles and constraints underlying the interaction between light and neural tissue. We then present advances in optical neurotechnologies in seven modules: conventional optical fibers, multifunctional fibers, optical waveguides, light-emitting diodes, upconversion nanoparticles, optical neuromodulation based on the secondary effects of light, and unconventional light sources facilitated by ultrasound and magnetic fields. We conclude our review with an outlook on new methods and mechanisms that afford optical neuromodulation with minimal invasiveness and footprint. 相似文献
853.
854.
855.
856.
Danielle Lane Sarah Semon Nicholas Catania Phyllis Jones 《British Journal of Special Education》2022,49(1):64-83
In this article we examine how, despite the understanding that a special school is not an inclusive setting, the senior leadership team (SLT) at Forest Academy Trust perceive their special schools as inclusive. Document reviews, interviews and a culminating focus group appear to indicate that possibilities for inclusive education may be related to a shared ethos of inclusion, resources, accessible opportunities, individualised approaches, and collaborative networks. These data also provide a critical insight into the perils related to inclusive education in multi-academy trusts (MATs). The study of this MAT highlights the need for changes to policies, access to and equitable distribution of resources, curricular freedom balanced with accountability, a shift toward collaborative networking and partnership, and a shared vision for enactment, which may be leveraged in order to provide equitable and sustainable system-wide inclusive practices. 相似文献
857.
Nicholas R. Werse 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2023,54(6):1878-1894
Although many academic disciplines are now experiencing a process of “greening” as scholars seek to cultivate an ecocritical awareness within disciplinary scholarship, Neil Selwyn notes that such ecocritical concerns rarely feature in the field of educational technology. In this paper, I bring Selwyn's call for ecocritical awareness in the field of educational technology into conversation with emerging scholarly discussions in the fields of ecojustice ethics, ecojustice education, and information and communications technology sustainability. In so doing, I expand the existing conversation about the environmental impact of educational technology consumption to argue that the process of cultivating an ecocritical awareness in the field of educational technology requires refining the discipline's focus to include the full lifespan of educational technology devices and the global inequities that feature during the production and disposal of these devices.
Practitioner Notes
What is already known about this topic- Despite substantive scholarship recognizing the environmental impact of the globalized digital technology supply chain, the field of educational technology has minimally considered the ecojustice implications of the material nature of educational technology devices when examining the environmental impact of these devices.
- In this paper, I argue that the reason why the field of educational technology has overlooked the environmental impact of device production and disposal is because of its almost exclusive focus on device use. I argue that cultivating an ecocritical awareness in the field of educational technology requires the discipline to expand its focus beyond device use in two ways: (a) to include device production and disposal and (b) to consider the global injustices that occur in these parts of the digital technology life cycle. As such, I build upon Selwyn and others to argue for the cultivation of ecojustice concerns in emerging conversations about ethics in the field of educational technology.
- The process of cultivating ecocritical awareness within the field of educational technology requires expanding the scope and focus of the discipline beyond device use to include device production and disposal. The planned obsolescence behind these devices maximizes the environmental harm at these stages and the global injustices associated with them. Educators and educational leaders seeking to employ educational technology in ethical and environmentally sustainable ways must consider these implications from the global digital technology supply chain.
858.
David Nicholas Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo Eti Herman Abdullah Abrizah David Clark Galina Serbina David Sims Marzena Świgoń Jie Xu Anthony Watkinson Hamid R. Jamali Carol Tenopir Suzie Allard 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):319-322
- 170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified.
- The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good.
- The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.