Moral Law and Moral Education: Defending Kantian Autonomy

In this paper, I examine why Kantian ethics has had such a hard time of it. I look at readings of Kant's moral theory that have had great force in the 20th century and conclude that these have much to do with an ensuing confusion, which has led to charges of rigidity, formality and severity. Then I demonstrate that when we make moral judgements we rely heavily on the stock of rules, norms, duties and laws that is extant in our social life. We use these as frames that are already influential in the role and scope of our anticipated moral action. We deliberate primarily by forming a maxim (principle) that must have the consent of all. We do so only occasionally, as the existing stock of rules is already in operation, helping us to reject out-of-hand outlandish or egregious maxims. Finally, I discuss, in very cursory form, some educational approaches based on this way of conceiving Kantian moral theory.     

Mirrors,Reflections and Refractions: The contribution of microteaching to reflective practice

This paper considers a range of strategies that can be used to promote reflection. We focus on microteaching as a vehicle for enabling students to become aware of their values, attitudes and assumptions about learning as these are enacted within microteaching. The subsequent feedback becomes a dialogue between student, peer, teacher fellow and tutor that provides different refractions of this practice and contributes to the development of reflection which we characterise in terms of pre-critical, internalised and hypothetical thresholds. At the pre-critical threshold a practitioner concentrates on their technical competence, using trial and error or survival strategies to manage time, resources and pupils. Practitioners apply more mentally rehearsed operations to address new situations within the internalised threshold. A practitioner operating on hypothetical issues works within the hypothetical threshold and may not have experiences of events to inform hypothetical situations, but is in a position to manage uncertainty. R´ESUMÉ Cet article prend en conside´ration une gamme de strate´gies qu'on puisse utiliser afin d'e´ncourager la re´flexion chez les e´tudiants. On fixe notre regard sur Microteaching (la pratique où un e´tudiant donne une lec¸on à une petite groupe d'e´lèves dans l'Unive´rsite´) comme moyen de leur permettre de prendre conscience de leurs valeurs, dispositions et suppositions concernant le savoir. Le feedback re´sultant devient un dialogue entre l'e´tudiant, ses semblables, professeurs et directeurs(trices) d'e´tudes qui fournisse de diffe´rentes re´fractions de cette pratique, et contribue au de´veloppement de la re´flexion. Un developpement qu'on caracte´rise en trois seuils: pre´-critique, interne et hypothe´thique. Au seuil pre-critique, le pratitien se concentre sur la compe´tence technique par tatonnements ou en utilisant des strate´gies de survie afin de se de´brouiller à propos de son temps, ses ressources et ses e´le ¤ ves. À travers le seuil interne, le pratitien mets en pratique des ope´rations plus mentalement re´pe´te´es en s'attaquant à desnouvelles situations. Le pratitien qui fonctionne à travers le seuil hypothe´tique n'aura pas ne´cessairement les expe´riences d'e´ve´nements pour informer les situations hypothe´tiques, mais il est en mesure de faire face a ¤ l'incertitude.     

The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments

Direct instruction approaches, as well as the design processes that support them, have been criticized for failing to reflect contemporary research and theory in teaching, learning, and technology. Learning systems are needed that encourage divergent reasoning, problem solving, and critical thinking. Student-centered learning environments have been touted as a means to support such processes. With the emergence of technology, many barriers to implementing innovative alternatives may be overcome. The purposes of this paper are to review and critically analyze research and theory related to technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments and to identify their foundations and assumptions.