试论苏轼对于杜诗的艺术批评与接受

北宋著名诗人、词人苏轼,不仅对于杜涛从艺术批评角度加以推崇,首倡杜诗“集大成”说,对后世诗人影响深远,而且在其诗词创作实践中,切实对于杜诗的艺术表现手法加以学习,且大量化用杜诗语典,验证了“子美集开诗世界”的诗学论断,在杜诗学发展史以及杜诗艺术接受史上都具有重要的意义。     

简述β系数的发展历程

在资本市场发展演变与实践过程中,正确度量投资风险一直是金融研究领域的核心问题。Sharpe（1964）等人在Markowitz投资组合理论的基础上推出资本资产定价模型（Capital Asset Pricing Model,CAPM）。此后这个模型广泛地应用在各个投资机构,基金管理,风险组合管理上。因而CAPM的关键因子：β系数的计算、性质以及如何能更好的实际应用就显得尤为重要,因此本文就β系数的定义、发展和β系数在中国的应用提出了一些看法。     

必要性与可能性:教师参与教师专业发展政策决策

教师参与教师专业发展政策决策不仅具有必要性,而且具备可能性。文章首先明确了教师参与教师专业发展政策决策的必要性:有利于教师专业发展政策的完善、保障教师的合法权利和利益及推动教师专业化成长。然后通过理论分析和事实分析提炼教师参与教师专业发展政策的可能性。理论分析包括政策法规依据和教师主体属性;事实分析包括现实基础和域外借鉴。     

义务教育教师流动动机调查及思考

通过对义务教育教师流动动机的调查,我们发现农村义务教育教师向发达地区以及城市流动的动机比较强烈,物质待遇和学校管理水平等原因是诱发教师流动的主要动机。因此,必须建立激励义务教育教师合理流动模型、制定完善的制度、提高教师待遇和学校管理水平,引导义务教育教师合理流动。     

核心素养视角下教师数智化培训体系建构研究

杭州市建兰中学围绕"建兰学校大脑助力教育教学改革"的培训主题,开启依托"学校大脑"的教师数智化培训平台研究.建兰中学以教师核心素养为内核,从教师评价和教师发展两个基本维度,设计出"教师画像"数据平台,全面收集和记录教师教育教学行为轨迹,形成多种层面的"教师画像",从多个维度反映与评价教师的教育教学行为,指明其最具增长点...     

分众分类系统中的用户行为研究

分众分类法Folksonomy作为一种平民分类法是Web 2.0时代的重要产物,为网络知识的组织和共享提供了一个良好的途径。分众分类系统中,用户通过标签Ta g对网络资源进行标注,标签特征一定程度上反映了用户的行为特征,因此文章首先通过对用户标签的统计分析,总结用户的标签特征,然后分别从标注动机、用户认知和社会认同角度对用户行为进行研究,最后根据用户的网络行为建立用户兴趣模型。     

The Rights of Children and Young People in State Care

Abstract

This article highlights the lack of human rights recognition for arguably one of the most vulnerable groups in our society, children and young people in the care of the state. Currently under New Zealand legislation and policy frameworks these children do not have their rights upheld, as per New Zealand’s obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). This is particularly important for the care and protection of children needing state care as the government has the responsibility as a state body to ensure their rights are upheld, alongside their direct responsibilities as the ‘corporate parent’. This article explores the vulnerability of this group and the ways in which their rights under UNCRC are not being met by current legislation and policy. It goes on to recommend changes to the way in which we approach legislative and policy development.     

Kämpfen gegen Windmühlen und reale Mächte: William Lottigs Tagebuch (1919–1921) als Ausdruck der politischen,pädagogischen und schulinternen Machverhältnisse in einer Hamburger Gemeinschaftsschule zu Beginn der 1920er Jahre

In his daily journal on the founding of the public experimental school, a “community school” at the Berliner Tor in Hamburg between spring 1919 and September 1921, Lottig describes the everyday issues confronting the principal of the “new school” at that time. These concern classroom instruction, teachers, parents, external pressures on the Berliner Tor-School, the relationship with the school administration, political issues prevalent in Hamburg at that time, ideological and philosophical debates as well as personal and family relationship problems, all of which Lottig describes in his journal. Lottig also noted the reasoning underpinning the development of the school experiments: the “old” schools in Hamburg had been closed, and the state had in their place established experimental schools. The journal clearly records the difficulties, issues and successes of a principal of one of the newly established community schools (Lebensgemeinschaftsschulen), which had been established as experimental schools. A perusal of the diary indicates that Jakob Robert Schmid’s sole and up to now only one known analysis of the journal comes off as biased and misleading. Schmid, professor of education at the University of Berne, had, at the beginning of the 1930s, only perused and analysed those portions of Lottig’s journal in which Lottig describes the rather turbulent if inspiring – and yet chaotic – operation of the community school in its first two years. While Schmid analysed these portions, he did not consider Lottig’s other, more favourable and constructive comments. Schmid also did not explain his one-sided selection of journal passages. Schmid brands Lottig and his team of teachers as educational novices and classifies the Berliner Tor-School as an “anti-authoritarian” institution, an experimental school like any other school experiment which overshoots the mark, not being educationally and institutionally meaningful. A more objective and principled approach in examining Lottig’s journal would have revealed that Lottig and his teachers were well aware of the main issue confronting the school, an issue that Schmid would also have found relevant: the relation of freedom and compulsion, within a setting that Lottig wanted to revitalise, to productively equilibrate without employing the customary disciplinary instruments. Lottig furthermore again and again points emphatically to the “growing pains” of all alternative schools (even when regulated by the state as an experimental school), whose goal it had been, to establish, even under difficult circumstances, a “new school-type” not utilising the traditional instruments of discipline, instruction and school management. This proves that Lottig was neither an educational ignoramus nor unaware of the basic issue of classroom instruction: how one can instruct with or without compulsion. Lottig’s goal had always been – and this Schmid also disregarded – to replace traditional, imposed, mandated or even self-imposed rules and regulations by new, commonly worked out rules. Lottig’s journal is a good example of the steadfast, unrelenting and energy-sapping aspiration of a school principal to balance the relation of school management versus a school’s self-development under the given circumstances. In addition, Schmid’s misinterpretation is a good example of how an observer, who hardly knew the Berliner Tor-School, would misuse this historical source by means of a biased interpretation to further his own views on scholastic education, views that Lottig himself would have preferred to provocatively examine – Schmid’s “authoritative pedagogy”, which goes beyond all authoritarian and non-authoritarian educational policies. What, then, would Lottig have recorded in his journal about a meeting with Schmid?     

Teaching in the ‘margins’: rekindling a passion for teaching

The data for this paper are drawn from a qualitative research project involving a number of alternative education sites in Australia and the United Kingdom. In this paper, we focus only on the motives and teaching philosophies of a sample of teachers who have chosen to work in alternative education sites despite, for some, the prospect of uncertain employment conditions and lower salaries. A thematic approach is used with the data so as to structure participant perspectives on a range of teaching-related issues. We argue that the experiences and perceptions of these teachers provide a starting point for reflection about the impact of many current educational policies that have been shaped or influenced by market-driven neo-liberal paradigms emphasising disciplinary accountabilities for teachers.     

Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities’ students: do personality traits,class room and technological factors matter?

Active and voluntarily sharing of knowledge is an essential element of effective and meaningful learning at university level. Recognising the role and importance of Big Five personality traits (extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness, emotional stability and openness) in encouraging knowledge-sharing behaviour, this paper adds the classroom (instructor support and degree of competition) and technological factors (technology availability and support) to model general knowledge-sharing patterns. Survey instrument was used to collect from six private and six public universities in Malaysia. Out of 700 surveys distributed, 474 data were used for analysis representing the response rate of 67.71%. Extraversion, conscientiousness, instructor support, degree of competition and technology support are found to have positive relationship with knowledge-sharing patterns. However, emotional stability is found to have negative relationship. A practical implication of these results is that instructors could advance knowledge sharing via personnel screening in forming assignment groups in their class as well as providing sufficient support and technology support to promote knowledge sharing among students.