爱因斯坦科学怀疑精神的境界

 科学怀疑是科学创新的先导,科学怀疑精神很大程度上决定着科学家的创新能力和创新水平。爱因斯坦的科学实践表明,科学怀疑有三种境界：敢于怀疑经典与权威,善于怀疑自己,允许别人怀疑自己。三种境界的递进提升表明科学家科学素养与人文素养的同时增进,也表明科学家创新能力的不断积聚。科学怀疑不是否定一切,而是要在怀疑批判与继承、怀疑自己与自信、允许他人怀疑自己与坚持真理之间保持必要的张力。     

爱因斯坦的创新思维及其启示

爱因斯坦倡导了一整套崭新的理论创造的思维方法：创设对立面思考,是他创新思维的主要手段;遵循美学规律思维,是他惯用于创造过程的基本技巧;运用直觉和灵感,是他创造思维的动力侧面;由假设走向演绎,是他的思维所采取的独特路线;叛逆传统、破除定式,是他进行理论创造的信念支柱。分析探讨爱因斯坦的思维方法,对于创新思维和创造活动具有重要的启发意义和操作价值。     

有热流的爱因斯坦场方程解

本文研究了具有热流的无切变球对称宇宙模型，并给出产生解的一般方法．用这种产生解的方法，可得到爱因斯坦场方程解．     

The educational cost of philosophical suicide: What it means to be lucid

The struggle to become lucid is at the heart of The Myth of Sisyphus. To understand the absurd is to understand that the fit between our conception of the world and the world itself is fraught with uncertainty; lucidity is the elucidation of the absurd. To be lucid is to revolt against the type of certainty that leads to suffering; to revolt against philosophical suicide. Camus teaches us the intellectual humility that stays hands; there is no reasoning that justifies suffering. If it is granted that the ability to recognise and respond to our own and others suffering is an important part of being human, and the task of education is to develop humans, then lucidity, in so far as it holds promise for the development of such an ability, has the potential to contribute positively to education.     

爱因斯坦与中国近代物理教育

本文从中国近代物理教育的角度,介绍了爱因斯坦为我国培养物理学人才和途经上海作相对论演讲等工作,从而指出爱因斯坦为我国物理教育所作的积极贡献。     

光量子理论的确立和发展

在介绍普朗克能量子理论和发现光电效应的基础上,论述了爱因斯坦光量子理论的产生、实验验证和形成过程,指出了光量子理论对现代物理学理论,尤其是量子力学发展的深刻影响。     

爱因斯坦与现代物理学

爱因斯坦是一位对科学发展有杰出贡献的伟大物理学家 .他所创立的相对论和对量子理论所做出的贡献奠定了现代物理学发展的理论基础 .同时他又是一位富有哲学探索精神和有强烈社会责任感的思想家 ,在人类科学史和思想史上产生了极其深远的影响 .     

理想实验--从伽利略到爱因斯坦

理想实验方法是物理学理论研究中常用的方法，通过对伽利略、爱因斯坦的典型理想实验的回顾，可以发现其方法论意义以及对我们的启示。     

玻尔与爱因斯坦关于量子力学的论战

综述了量子力学在解释问题上激烈而长期的争论过程.研究分析了不同派别之间争论的认识论基础和哲学观念的差异.     

Inoculation against Wonder: Finding an antidote in Camus,pragmatism and the community of inquiry

In this paper, we will explore how Albert Camus has much to offer philosophers of education. Although a number of educationalists have attempted to explicate the educational implications of Camus’ literary works, these analyses have not attempted to extrapolate pedagogical guidelines towards developing an educational framework for children’s philosophical practice in the way Matthew Lipman did from John Dewey’s philosophy of education, which informed his philosophy for children curriculum and pedagogy. We focus on the phenomenology of inquiry; that is, inquiry that begins with genuinely felt doubt, pointing to a problematic to which the inquirer seeks a solution or resolution. We argue that the central purpose of education is to develop lucid individuals. To this end, we concentrate on Dewey and the pragmatist tradition, starting from Peirce, leading to Lipman’s development of Dewey’s educational guidelines into classroom practice. We show where Camus and the pragmatists are congruent in their thinking, insofar as they can inform the educative process of the community of inquiry. What we conclude is that the role of the teacher is to develop lucid individuals facilitated in a classroom that is transformed into a community of inquiry embedded in contemporary historical moments.