论图书馆职业精神

文章论述了图书馆职业精神及其特征，探讨了图书馆职业精神的内涵，分析了构成图书馆职业精神的基本要素。     

图书馆职业伦理研究

重视职业伦理是现代图书馆运动引人注目的成果之一。图书馆职业伦理守则体现了 图书馆的基本职业理念、职业精神和职业规范。图书馆信息服务中应遵循公共存取、客观公正、 尊重隐私权与知识产权、精益服务及人文关怀等基本伦理原则。参考文献11。     

How U.S. and Chinese journalists think about plagiarism

A comparison of 1,096 professional journalists in China and the United States on attitudes toward attribution and plagiarism reveals Chinese journalists were more likely to see attribution as a practice to be embraced regardless of career longevity and culture, suggesting journalistic norms are more important than a collectivist orientation. Attribution was more likely to be embraced by those who see principles as more important than expediency, affirming research that plagiarism is hardly a monolithic concept. Overall, journalists in the two nations did not vary significantly in their attitudes toward plagiarism, despite vast differences in culture and politics as well as evidence that in some other fields China is more accepting of reusing material without attribution. The data show that among journalists, attitudes toward plagiarism are shared across national boundaries, reinforcing related research showing that a journalism culture exists and is shared at least in part across national boundaries.     

The Changing Research Data Landscape and the Experiences of Ethics Review Board Chairs: Implications for Library Practice and Partnerships

Academic libraries have to a large extent taken the lead in facilitating new approaches to research data management, but changes to the research data landscape have had an impact on numerous areas of academic work, including ethics review. Using interpretive phenomenological analysis of interviews with chairs of Canadian research ethics boards, this study explores how ethics review boards have experienced changes to data policy and related technologies in order to describe the ethical implications of new approaches to data management and to explore ways in which the library, ethics review boards, and other campus partners might harmonize efforts to support emerging data practices. While ethics review boards in Canada are keenly aware of open data policies, data publishing in practice is still nascent. There is uncertainty about the adoption of changing technologies for research and their impacts on privacy protection. Where responsibility lies for addressing these uncertainties is often unclear. Academic libraries and research ethics boards are well-suited to engage in mutual knowledge transfer and to integrate data management planning and ethics review processes. Institutional-level oversight that includes all campus departments impacted by changes to the research data landscape may facilitate improved communication and reduce role ambiguity.     

From Inarticulacy to Care

This article seeks to critically re-open the closed structure of news coverage of ethnic minorities by proposing a dialogical model of representation, which evokes mutual understanding across differences through well-crafted narratives of minority experiences. Informed by Mikhail Bakhtin and Charles Taylor, it explores the notion of “dialogue” within journalistic narratives and delineates two dialogical approaches, namely the evaluative articulation of moral values and the polyphonic incorporation of different voices. The former suggests that journalists should employ nuanced languages to situate ethnic minorities’ aspirations and experiences in a common “horizon of significance”. The latter challenges the hegemonic monologue of an ostensibly objective narration and accentuates the manifold voices from ordinary people, urging the journalists to rethink their positionality as narrators. Two cases are analyzed to reveal how the dialogic representation can be realized in news reporting, calling for a transition from “ethics of inarticulacy” to ethics of care in journalism practices.     

Placing Facebook

Facebook is challenging professional journalism. These challenges were evident in three incidents from 2016: the allegation that Facebook privileged progressive-leaning news on its trending feature; Facebook’s removal of the Pulitzer Prize-winning “Napalm Girl” photo from the pages of prominent users; and the proliferation of “fake news” during the US presidential election. Using theoretical concepts from the field of boundary work, this paper examines how The Guardian, The New York Times, Columbia Journalism Review and Poynter editorialized Facebook’s role in these three incidents to discursively construct the boundary between the value of professional journalism to democracy and Facebook’s ascendant role in facilitating essential democratic functions. Findings reveal that these publications attempted to define Facebook as a news organization (i.e., include it within the boundaries of journalism) so that they could then criticize the company for not following duties traditionally incumbent upon news organizations (i.e., place it outside the boundaries of journalism). This paper advances scholarship that focuses on both inward and outward conceptions of boundary work, further explores the complex challenge of defining who a journalist is in the face of rapidly changing technological norms, and advances scholarship in the field of media ethics that positions ethical analysis at the institutional level.     

高校学报主编伦理与学报建设

主编伦理是伦理道德体系中作者、编辑、读者在对学术出版环境价值观念认同的基础上提出的维护学术交流道德观念和行为的要求.学报主编的学术声誉、管理艺术和人格魅力,是高校学报建设与发展的基础、动力和关键.高校学报要准确定位,突出特色和优势并保持发展,必须从选聘、培育、制度规范等方面加强学报主编伦理构建.     

论房地产开发企业的伦理建设问题

迄今为止,很少有文献具体地论及到房地产开发企业的伦理问题。本文首先分析了当前房地产开发中伦理缺失的种种表象,接着探讨了房地产开发中伦理建设的主要内容,最后给出了加强房地产企业伦理建设的思路与对策。     

中文核心医药期刊官网生物医学研究伦理审查制度建设现状与提升策略

对中文核心医药期刊官网中的生物医学研究伦理审查制度建设现状进行调查分析,为加强我国生物医学研究伦理审查制度建设提供参考.从《中文核心期刊要目总览(2017年版)》收录的255种医药期刊中随机选取100种中文核心医药期刊作为研究对象,登录这100种医药期刊官网,对生物医学研究伦理审查要求进行分析.结果 表明:在100种中文核心医药期刊官网中,稿约或投稿指南对生物医学研究伦理审查有要求的期刊51种,其中对临床试验伦理审查要求最多(49种期刊),对提供临床试验注册号要求最少(12种期刊);官网主页设置"医学伦理"栏目的 只有10种期刊,其中对临床试验伦理审查与动物实验伦理审查要求最多(9种期刊),只有3种期刊有上传生物医学研究伦理审查办法文件.有6种期刊在稿约对生物医学研究伦理学有要求的同时,在主页也设置了"医学伦理"栏目.可见,中文核心期刊官网对生物医学研究伦理审查不够重视,应进一步加强医学伦理审查制度的建设.科技期刊编辑部应与国际接轨,学习国际著名期刊的做法,更新办刊理念;利用好官网提供生物医学研究伦理学习资源,对作者进行医学伦理教育;应制定统一的生物医学研究伦理审查规范.     

建立什么样的图书馆职业精神

主要从四个方面论述了图书馆职业精神的核心内容,即以图书馆职业为从业的价值标准,在理解图书馆职业的社会使命的基础上获得对职业的认同感,以崇尚科学的精神来理解图书馆职业的责任意识,用职业道德规范来实践图书馆职业精神。