论中国语境下Disinformation概念的对接、转换与重新阐释

[目的/意义]针对中西方理解与应用Disinformation概念存在较大差异这一现状,提出中国语境下这一概念的对接、转换与重新阐释,为围绕中国问题开展Disinformation研究创造条件,进而在我国开辟新的研究领域。[方法/过程]梳理分析中西方理解Disinformation概念的差异,然后基于这一概念的3种基本属性,提出Disinformation概念进入中国语境的基本路径,即"对接→转换→重新阐释"。[结果/结论]"信息""误导""意图"3种属性及施众、受众两个要素,是中西方Disinformation概念对接、转换的基础和依据;从"信息"和"信息活动"两个角度,提出中国语境下Disinformation概念的两种定义,Disinformation则译为"误导性信息"或"信息误导与反误导"。Disinformation概念经重新阐释,可应用于研究中国社会现象,解决中国现实问题。     

体育强国内涵的再审视

从语言学、政治内涵、学术内涵三个视角对体育强国进行解读,认为体育强国不仅是一个静态的目标,也是一个动态的过程;体育强国的政治内涵将从"竞技体育强国"向"群众体育和竞技体育全面发展"转变;学术内涵的争议本质上是体育概念和强弱标准的争议。     

浅析小学语文阅读教学中的多元有界性

新课改实施以来,多元化解读的阅读教学开始盛行于课堂。阅读教学中应该注重多元解读。但是,在近期的阅读教学过程中却出现误读和过度拓展等一些误区。本文针对当前多元解读的泛滥现象,试图寻求阅读教学中多元解读的界限和走出误区的策略。     

浅谈博物馆英语讲解

近年来,中外文化交流日益频繁,越来越多的外国游客来到中国,走入博物馆参观。而英语是世界上最被广泛使用的第二语言,因此英语讲解在纪念馆与外国游客之间起到了重要的桥梁作用,是向世界展示中国悠久的历史和文化的形象窗口。然而,当前博物馆的英语讲解仍不能满足外宾参观的需求,在数量、质量和深度上皆有待提高。需要通过培养英语讲解人才、加强考核培训等方式来提高博物馆的英语讲解水平。     

文图结合打造动感课堂--幼儿绘本教学经验谈

绘本就是以图画为主、文字为辅或者完全没有文字来诠释图画的书籍。幼儿园绘本教学活动是教师有目的、有计划、有组织地把绘本作为教材为提升幼儿阅读能力服务的教与学的全过程。本文就绘本教学提出几点建议和意见。     

《敦煌变文校注》校勘零拾

本以《敦煌变校注》为范本，参照《英藏敦煌献》、《法藏敦煌西域献》、《俄藏敦煌献》以及《敦煌宝藏》所收敦煌原卷照片，指出《敦煌变校注》录方面的疏误。     

《新编大学英语课文辅导》中几个阅读理解问题的探讨

文章指出了《新编大学英语课文辅导》一书参考译文中的15处不恰当的中文翻译，并从词义、语法结构、上下文以及文化背景等方面进行了认真分析，阐明了自己的见解，并以此强调了独立阅读的重要性。     

The Skills of Practical Writing for Tour Guide(Ⅱ)--Points for Attention

Totranslatetravelcommentary,manyplacesshould bepaidattention.Howevertherearethreekeypointsthat atourguideshouldgivemoreattentionto.Theyarethe interpretationofthesourcelanguage,structureofthe targetlanguageandchoiceoftherightword.Thefollowing isadiscussionaboutthesepointsforattention. i.Interpretationofthesourcelanguage Intranslating,understandingtotheoriginaltextisthe firststep.Differentunderstandingmakesdifferent translation.Itisthepre-conditiontomakeagoodversion. Therefore,readingtheorigin…     

Topic variability and criteria in interpretational history teaching

This paper studies the teacher perceived applicability of historical topics for interpretational history teaching and the criteria teachers use to evaluate this applicability. For this study, 15 expert history teachers in the Netherlands striving for interpretational history teaching were purposefully selected. Teachers were asked to mention historical topics using a ranking task technique to rank topics in order of applicability and to elaborate on how the topics were ranked. The results showed a large variation in perceived applicability among topics, both within and between teachers. Eight different topic-applicability criteria were discerned in the teachers’ elaborations: (1) topic knowledge; (2) topic affinity; (3) topic constructedness; (4) topic deconstructability; (5) topic abstractedness; (6) topic sensitivity; (7) topic materials; and (8) topic inclusion in the history curriculum. We found that teachers tended to judge topics as applicable for interpretational history teaching partly depending on the degree of ‘canonised interpretativity’ in lesson materials and the curriculum, and to the degree to which they belonged to ‘cold’ (morally neutral) or ‘hot’ (morally sensitive) history. A theoretical implication of the findings is that interpretational history teaching is topic-dependent. Teachers can be supported to teach history as interpretation by structured pedagogies.     

The Perfect Marriage? – Language and Art Criticism in the Hong Kong Public Examination Context

Art education in Hong Kong has undergone various changes in response to educational reform. In art assessment, a major change in the Hong Kong New Senior Secondary (NSS) Curriculum is the inclusion of art criticism as a compulsory component of the new public examination. Assessing students’ abilities to interpret art in an art criticism public examination context is a critical issue in Hong Kong because the new senior secondary curriculum and assessment has brought attention to the role of written language in the art examination paper. This means the examination assesses not only students’ abilities to interpret art, but also their language abilities required to respond to art in written form. Since this new mode of assessment of art criticism has been published a number of issues have appeared. Recent studies show that teachers and students perceive this development negatively and they believe that the written format will assess students’ written language abilities rather than their critical abilities. These findings challenge the justification of the new art assessment policy and raise questions about the role of written language in responding to art. This article aims to raise the issue of the marriage between language and art criticism in the Hong Kong public examination context. It argues and examines the relationship of language to art interpretation, reasoning in the assessment, and issues in the public art criticism examination context. The issues addressed in this article provide opportunities for researchers and policy makers to reconsider and refine the new form of examination.