从译者主体性浅析David Copperfield两个中译本

作为翻译的主体,译者主观能动地跳出语言层面的束缚。结合译入语语言文化背景,对原作的内容含义和文化精神进行再创作。在文学翻译中,译者主体性表现得更为突出。对语言形式的叛逆是为了达到功能对等,是为了更好地忠实于原文。本文将通过对David Copperfiel两个中译本的浅析,分析译者主体性在文学翻译中的体现及所取得的效果。     

小说对话翻译策略探究：会话含义的视角——以《红楼梦》的两个译本对比为切入点

格赖斯的＂合作原则＂和会话含义推导理论为理解人类交际过程中违背交际准则的对话提供了强大的分析工具。小说对话中作者通常故意违背交际准则以达到传递会话含义的目的。在翻译小说对话时,使用＂合作原则＂和会话含义推导理论,使译文与原文在语用效果上等值。《红楼梦》两译本中对人物对话的处理为总结小说对话翻译策略提供了原材料。     

乔纳森建构主义的认识论特征分析及其对教学设计发展的影响

文章通过对乔纳森建构主义观点的认识论特征进行分析和研究,指出对传统教学设计影响主要体现在教学设计理论基础和教学设计模式等方面,对我国教学改革具有重要指导意义和影响。但其在教学设计中过分强调主体的能动作用而忽略客体对认识的制约作用,因此在应用乔纳森建构主义观点进行教学设计时需要同时考虑学习的主体和客体的作用。     

Philosophical skepticism not relativism is the problem with the Strong Programme in Science Studies and with Educational Constructivism

The structure of David’s Bloor argument for the Strong Programme (SP) in Science Studies is criticized from the philosophical perspective of anti-skeptical, scientific realism. The paper transforms the common criticism of SP—that the symmetry principle of SP implies an untenable form of cognitive relativism—into the␣clear philosophical issue of naturalism versus Platonism. It is also argued that the concrete patterns of SP’s interest-explanations and its sociological definition of knowledge involve philosophical skepticism. It is claimed, then, that the most problematic elements of SP reside primarily in philosophical skepticism. It is also claimed that this sort of criticism can be directed against other more radical, versions of constructivism in science and science education studies.     

Collingridge and the dilemma of control: Towards responsible and accountable innovation

The paper critically reviews the work of David Collingridge in the light of contemporary concerns about responsibility and accountability in innovation, public engagement with science and technology, and the role of scientific expertise in technology policy. Given continued interest in his thoughts on the ‘social control of technology’, and the ‘dilemma of control’, this attention is both timely and overdue. The paper illuminates a mismatch between the prevalence of citations to Collingridge’s work on the dilemma of control in the literature on responsible innovation, and the depth of engagement with his arguments. By considering neglected aspects of Collingridge’s substantive, methodological and philosophical analysis, important implications can be drawn for theory and practice relating to the governance of innovation and co-evolution between technology and society. The paper helps to improve understandings of wider political contexts for responsible innovation, especially in relation to anticipatory, participatory and institutional aspects of governance.     

论《蝴蝶君》的雌雄同体

《蝴蝶君》的人物身上性别模糊和雌雄同体特征明显,这些雌雄同体特征也是决定人物各自命运的关键。强烈的性别意识和对立导致了剧中人物无法达到两性的和谐。文章以弗吉尼亚·吴尔夫在《一间自己的房间》里提出的"雌雄同体"概念中的三个特征:男性化的女人与女性化的男人、性别意识和两性和谐来分析《蝴蝶君》以及作者黄哲伦残缺的雌雄同体观。     

霍尔顿:道德自我分裂及其生命悲剧

杰罗姆·戴维·塞林格的小说致力于探索现代社会的特征和现代人类的真实生存境况;从不同的角度揭示出了个人生存窘境和个体悲剧命运的必然性。将作品的阐释和人类的生存思考融为一体,应用查尔斯.泰勒的自我理论,来解读塞林格的成名作《麦田里的守望者》以及对人类道德信仰危机的焦虑和隐忧;分析主人翁霍尔顿的道德自我的组成因素和内在矛盾以及道德自我的分裂以何种方式影响了霍尔顿的人生选择,以至于进一步导致了他的生命悲剧。     

论《瓦尔登湖》的篇章结构及象征意义

通过对美国19世纪超验主义作家梭罗的代表作《瓦尔登湖》的篇章结构及象征意义的分析,探讨了《瓦尔登湖》的艺术魅力和认识价值以及超验主义文学的特点。