特殊儿童家庭社会支持情况调查报告

对221户特殊儿童家长问卷的调查显示,特殊儿童家庭面临的三大困难是:经济困难、康复和特殊教育知识缺乏以及时间和精力不足。特殊儿童家庭实际获得的社会支持很少。一方面,社会现有资源未得到合理利用;另一方面,各系统层面所提供的支持未能很好满足特殊儿童家庭的需要,特别是支持源与被支持者之间的沟通渠道不通畅。     

对我国随班就读发展现状评价的问卷调查报告

本调查对我国随班就读的发展现状进行了评价。结果表明 :中国随班就读工作是成功的 ,其成就包括 :保障体系有力 ;班级氛围较好 ;特殊儿童交往能力发展较好 ;教师具有奉献精神 ,能够制定个别教育计划 ;随班就读对特殊儿童有利 ;检测和评价较好。但在教育行政部门管理、教育资源、学校氛围、特殊儿童生活与自律能力、教师接受专业培训、学校与家长合作等方面存在许多问题。     

高中英语教师新课程培训需求调研模式述析

以期刊文献中的三次高中英语教师新课程培训需求调研为分析对象,对高中英语教师新课程培训需求调研的形式以及调研结果分析利用的情况进行了分析,概括了已有调研模式对新课程培训者的启发,并对目前以及未来教师新课程培训需求调研的领域提出了思考,希望对培训机构、培训者有所帮助。     

“需要层次”理论视域下对雷锋车精神代代相传的深层次原因探究

市场经济的竞争意识和利益诉求逐渐左右了人们的思维方式,经济利益最大化原则以及市场经济的交换原则逐渐演变成为公共空间的普遍性交往原则。于是,“雷锋过时”的论调不绝于耳,“雷锋精神”逐渐被边缘化。然而,在后现代历史语境下,在连云港这个区域,“雷锋车精神”却能够得到发扬光大,以客观事实向我们明示“雷锋精神必将世代相传”的真理。由此可见,探究“雷锋车精神代代相传”的深层次原因,是实践活动本身向理论提问的诉求,也是构建和谐社会、获得幸福人生的认识需求。本文主要从“需要层次”的理论视角,探究“雷锋车精神代代相传”的深层次原因,以精神分析学派的人格结构理论,探讨“雷锋车精神代代相传”的历史文化根源,从而反驳“雷锋过时论”,警醒人们抗拒奢侈的消费欲望,拒绝物化需要,恢复和强化敬业爱岗、助人为乐的精神,回归人与人交往的自然本性,达到幸福指数的提升。     

关于普小教师与特教教师对有特殊教育需要学生随班就读态度的调查

从北京市普通小学和特殊学校中随机抽取了 1 88名教师进行问卷调查。结果表明 ,对有特殊教育需要的学生在普通班级随班就读的基本态度上 ,普小教师持赞同态度的人数百分比明显低于特教教师。教师对随班就读的态度不受教龄、性别及是否修读过特殊教育课程的影响。教师对有特殊教育需要学生在普通班级随班就读的主要忧虑是学生的学习能力较差、教师专业知识和经验不够 ,缺少时间和精力、同学关系、教学条件、家长配合、学生的行为问题、教师态度、以及相应的政策、人员编制、校领导的关心和支持等。     

我国电子图书数字图书馆建设现状的调查分析

为了解我国电子图书数字图书馆建设与数字出版市场现状,设计面向全国图书馆采购与使用电子图书数字图书馆情况的调查问卷,利用问卷调查法、统计分析法和信息计量分析法对调查结果进行分析,结果表明目前电子图书市场是以超星、方正、书生之家、中国数字图书馆为首的完全竞争市场,电子图书数字图书馆的发展依赖于政府支持、先进技术支持、读者素养的提高和采购经费的增加4个方面。     

我国高职教育发展的国际合作之路

采取中外合作的模式开展国际合作办学，是我国高等职业教育跨越高速发展的必由之路。这是高职教育发展的历史和现状及世界经济一体化所决定的。入世后，高职教育有开展国际合作的需要和可能，合作形式也在日益增多和完善。     

发展体育经济的社会心理因素分析

竞技运动和消遣娱乐的全球性“体育热”，这种社会需求提示我们，体育经济的发展路径是如何适应社会心理的趋向，充分利用体育运动的文化诱因，展示体育经济作为“文化经济”的内含，以此在经济与文化的良性互动中，繁荣体育经济。     

Pupil involvement in special educational needs disagreement resolution: some perceived barriers to including children in mediation

Recent legislation in England has encouraged the use of disagreement resolution and mediation and emphasised the need to involve pupils in their own schooling. These policies apply in the educational system generally, but are particularly significant in the area of special educational needs (SEN). Kirstie Soar, a lecturer in the School of Psychology at the University of East London; Katie Burke, a PhD student at Salford University, Manchester; Katia Herbst, an independent researcher offering research and development services to the not-for- profit sector; and Professor Irvine Gersch, Director of the MSc educational psychology programme at the University of East London, set out to examine how pupil involvement in informal disagreement resolution has developed across 11 English regions since its introduction. The research consisted of 12 in-depth interviews with local education authority (LEA) SEN officers, mediators and parent partnership officers (PPOs) involved in informal special educational needs disagreement resolution. The aims of the study were to determine how far children were actually involved in mediation and what, if any, barriers existed which were seen to restrict such pupil involvement. A thematic analysis of interview content was conducted. Four major themes emerged, including: the distinction between direct and indirect pupil involvement; the importance of the child's view and how it is elicited; the role of other agencies; and other barriers to pupil involvement in informal disagreement resolution. Direct pupil involvement was found to be limited and variable, but indirect pupil involvement was more prevalent. In this article, the authors note a series of recommendations concerning pupil involvement in the mediation process and, in conclusion, put forward the implications of their work for future policy, practice and research.     

Acceptance or rejection? The social experiences of children with special educational needs and disabilities within a mainstream primary school

ABSTRACT

This article details a study which investigated the social acceptance and friendships of children with SEND, and their typically developing peers, at a mainstream primary school in the North West of England. Participants were 29 children aged five and six years old, separated into three groups; typically developing children, children who were being monitored for SEND, and children with formally identified SENDs. With the use of a peer nomination sociometric technique, findings revealed that children with SEND had less promising peer relations and friendships compared to children tracked for SEND and their typically developing peers, consequently questioning the mainstream ‘ideal’.