我国各地区城乡协调发展的初步评价及预测

平衡不等于协调,要跳出"平衡-不平衡"怪圈看协调;城乡是一个相互依存的地域系统,城乡协调发展的实质是该系统整体利益极大化与内部公平的统一。从协调发展内涵讨论入手,设计了基于效率-公平统一性的协调度评价模型,考察了1995-2005年各地区城乡协调发展的状态及其变化,预测了"十一五"末期的态势,提出了改进城乡协调发展的政策建议。从长期变化看,效率和公平之间存在着"效率优先阶段、效率公平兼顾阶段、公平优先阶段"三阶段目标演替规律,我国目前整体上处在"效率公平兼顾阶段"。通过不同方案的模拟发现,协调度对提高农民收入反应灵敏,启示我们要加快新农村建设步伐,大力提高农村居民的人均收入水平。     

美国校企合作案例及评价标准研究

校企合作在提高企业技术竞争力,拓展企业技术资源方面起着重要作用。校企合作还加快了新技术市场化的进程,20世纪90年代美国的校企合作取得了巨大的成功。通过四个典型案例重点介绍了当代美国大学与企业合作研究的情况,并对校企合作中的关键问题进行了探讨。     

渍害土壤肥力综合评价研究——以湖北省潜江市高场农场为例

利用因子分析、相关分析和模糊数学原理 ,针对渍害土壤的 1 0项肥力指标进行了土壤肥力的综合评价。根据S型或抛物线型作物效应曲线建立各项肥力指标的隶属度函数 ,计算出隶属度值 ,并按各肥力指标的公因子方差、相关系数确定其权重系数 ,从而求得各渍害类型土壤肥力综合指标值 (IFI) ,检验两种方法的IFI与其对应的水稻产量间的相关性 ,表明均达极显著水平 (r=0 75 2 1 ) ,说明综合评价结果能较好地反映出土壤的肥力。     

基础研究评价若干问题的认识

本文分析了社会对基础研究评价的需求 ,探讨了基础研究发展环境的变化对基础研究评价观念的影响 ,在此基础上阐述了基础研究评价的主要对象和目标 ,结合发达国家对基础研究评价的认识和做法 ,探讨了实际评价时应该坚持的原则和方法。     

科技型中小企业融资能力评价研究

科技型中小企业发展中面临较多风险,成长性难以预料,使银行等金融机构较难做出贷款决策,因此,设计一套能正确评价企业融资能力的模型非常必要。运用AHP法和模糊综合评价法,选取代表科技型中小企业融资能力的23项指标,建立融资能力评价指标体系,求得各层指标权重系数后,最终构建了评价融资能力的计量模型。     

美国研究型大学国际化评估指标、策略及对我国的启示

2001年和2006年,美国教育委员会（ACE）先后两次对美国研究型大学的国际化现状进行了全国范围的问卷评估。评估内容涉及明确承诺、专业提供、组织架构、外部资金、大学对师资的投入、国际学生和学生项目等六个维度。评估报告总结了高度活跃的研究型大学的国际化策略选择,为活跃度低的研究型大学的工作改善提供了建议与借鉴。其评估指标具有以下特点：遵循分类指导的原则;内容指向学校的组织策略;体现了品质与绩效兼容并蓄的价值取向及对研究型大学国际化的改善功能。对我国大学国际化评估指标的构建具有启示作用。     

Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning

In the present study it was investigated whether high school students are spontaneously able to reflect epistemologically during online searching for information about a controversial topic. In addition, we examined whether activating epistemic beliefs is related to individual characteristics, such as prior knowledge of the topic and argumentative reasoning skill; also whether learning from the Web is influenced by epistemic beliefs in action and the ability to detect fallacies in arguments. The participants (N = 64) were students of Grade 13, who were asked to think aloud during navigation. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed. Findings reveal that most participants spontaneously activated beliefs about all four dimensions identified in the literature, that is, about the simplicity/complexity, certainty/uncertainty, justification, and source of knowledge, at different levels of sophistication. Most epistemic reflections were about the source of knowledge. Two patterns of contextualized epistemic beliefs emerged and significantly influenced learning from the Web, which was also affected by participants' ability to identify argumentative fallacies.     

从语言的评价意义看景区公示语翻译

分析景区公示语翻译过程中,其语言的评价意义及评价级差的变化,并尝试从中西方读者的价值观差异、语篇及翻译成果的可接受性原则和公示语作为语篇必须符合信息性标准来解释其变化的合理性。     

基于“人本主义”的学生评价

学生评价是教育评价的核心内容,基于人本主义的学生评价立足于学生自身的发展和提高。评价秉持以人为本、尊重个体差异等教育理念。在评价过程中,规避了传统学生评价过分强调甄别与选拔功能、评价主体倒置,评价内容忽视学生情感和态度因素、评价标准无视学生差异等现象,有利于激励学生学习,根据学生的实际改进教学过程,促进学生更好地发展。     

A comparison of online versus traditional student end‐of‐course critiques in resident courses

This study outlines the intraclass differences between online and traditional student end‐of‐course critiques (EOCCs) only in the context of resident courses. Previous research into these differences appears limited to studies that compare entire classes rather than studies within any given class. Hypotheses are stated that the administration method has an effect on: how students will rate EOCCs, EOCC response rates, and, the detail level, favourability level and number of EOCC comments. In this field experiment, students in resident business courses at a large university comprised the sample. Individuals from within each class were randomly assigned either to a control group that completed a traditional paper‐based EOCC or to an experimental group that completed a similar EOCC online. Comments were coded with regard to the level of detail, favourability and total number of comments. Analysis of variance was used to compare the two groups with regard to ratings, comments and response rates. Online EOCCs had lower response rates, lower overall ratings, but more detailed comments. The methodology had no significant effect on the number or favourability level of comments.