管理学数据库Emerald简介及其经营策略

本文对管理学数据库Emerald的概况、产品特色进行了分析,对其经营策略、存在的困难和未来发展前景进行探讨.     

Personality and preference for evaluation methods: A study among business administration students

The goal of this study is to verify whether preference for evaluation methods can be predicted by personality as defined by the Big Five model, when controlling for gender and business major. A sample of 108 students enrolled in two compulsory undergraduate business courses completed an online questionnaire. Analysis of multiple linear hierarchical regressions indicate that gender, business major and personality account for 7–16% of the variance in preference for case studies, group work, oral exams, written exams, multiple choice tests, and practical work. These findings are discussed with regard to the relationship between personality factors predicting preference for evaluation methods and potential impacts on student evaluation and academic success in business schools.     

评价信息咨询的模糊综合评判法

从信息咨询的三要素：即信息源(各种文本知识)、媒介(咨询方式与咨询员)和信宿(读者)出发，归纳出15种评价信息咨询质量的指标，建立起评价指标体系，并提出一种模糊综合评判法，以客观地对图书馆信息咨询工作进行评价。     

试论体育专业教学评价的时代特征

教学评价是教学活动中的重要环节。随着教育教学思想、观念的更新 ,体育教学的指导思想、目标的发展与变化 ,体育教学评价的时代性特征表现为 :评价内容的全面性、评价指标的层次性、评价对象的整体性、评价目的的发展性、评价方式的综合性和评价结果的导航性。     

体能训练原理探析

从规律、原理、原则三内在的逻辑关系论述了训练原理和原则的产生过程，提出了训练适应是体能训练的主要原理，从新的视角对运动负荷的概念进行剖析，对恢复机制提出了新的见解。     

高校网络教育资源评价的探讨

随着教育信息化的发展,网络教育资源作为高校教育信息化的重要组成部分,发挥着越来越重要的作用。科学的评价体系是提高高校网络教育资源质量和服务的重要保障。评价目标、评价指标、评价方法和评价策略是建构科学的评价体系的核心内容,通过对上述评价体系核心内容进行深入地探讨,以推动科学的高校网络资源评价体系的完善和发展。     

中、美大学网站规模的对比研究*

网站规模是决定网站信息资源丰裕度和用户信息检索效率的重要因素，网站的字节数、总文件数、页面文件数和总链接数是目前用于衡量网站规模最重要的指标。本研究以美国101所著名商学院和医学院的网站，以及国内7所知名财经院校的网站为研究对象，通过对中、美网站以及美国商学院与医学院网站的比较分析，不仅明确了中、美网站在规模上的差异，更重要的是为大学网站建设和评价提出了具有重要价值的参考数据。     

“以学生为中心”：罗杰斯人本主义的教育思想

罗杰斯是美国著名的人本主义心理学家,他提出了一系列的人本主义教育思想：教育目标论、学习论、教学论以及自主评价观。“以学生为中心”是其教育理论的立足点,他的人本主义教育思想丰富且对当今教育实践具有积极意义。     

教学资源库检索系统评价及其优化策略研究——以广州“教育E时代”主题资源库为例

本文从用户利用的角度,以广州"教育E时代"主题资源库检索系统为例,通过评价指标体系构建,抽样问卷调查和重点用户访谈等方式,全面评价教学资源库各项指标性能。针对用户使用过程中存在的种种问题,相应提出了增加本地资源、优化分类体系和数据存储格式、优化检索窗口设计、简化检索界面、增强系统交互性等策略。     

Reactivity without legitimacy? Online consumer reviews in the restaurant industry

In recent years, web sites where individual consumers can rate and review goods and services have mushroomed all over the Internet. Restaurants are particularly affected by online reviewing. If the impact of online consumer reviews (OCRs) on the demand side of markets is now well understood and measured, few studies examine the reception of this new evaluation method by those who are assessed. Based on interviews with French restaurant managers, our research shows that OCRs systems reconfigure relations of accountability in the restaurant industry. We use the notion of reactivity to describe the mechanisms through which the new evaluation system transforms the activity of restaurants. We also examine the affects surrounding the reception of ratings and reviews by restaurant managers and the moral criteria that accompany their discourses on online reviews. Many restaurants consider online reviews as a brutal and hypocritical mode of judgment. The judgment produced by online ratings and reviews is not easily borne by restaurant managers, because it challenges the conventions of quality they had previously internalized as legitimate, that is, those produced by professional experts. We interpret this ambivalent reception as the unfinished movement of transforming a performative reputation device into a legitimate evaluation institution.