翻转课堂里的TPACK和TSACK——基于一项英语教学研究的讨论

从翻转课堂的视角探讨在基于学生思辨素养的英语演绎教学案例中所呈现现的教学模式、师生交流、教学环境、学习内容等方面的变化。在对教师和学生的综合能力和知识结构进行分析讨论后,梳理了TPACK（整合技术的学科和教学知识）框架的不足,进而从学生的角度提出TSACK（整合技术的学科和策略知识）框架。翻转课堂不仅体现了课堂形式的翻转,也体现了TPACK和TSACK之间的相互影响、相互促进。师生知识结构的交流与结合为信息时代的教学研究提供了一个新思路,也为翻转课堂的发展提供了新的实证案例。     

从翻转课堂到翻转会议——O2O环境中学术会议的组织模型及技术支撑体系研究

随着教育理念和信息技术的发展,基于O2O环境的翻转课堂已成为当前教育教学领域的研究热点与实践趋势。作为信息传播、问题探讨和知识扩散的特定活动,学术会议与课堂教学有着诸多类似的方面。为此．借鉴翻转课堂的理念提出了翻转会议的概念,并剖析了国内外两次翻转式学术会议的组织案例。并在前期研究成果——面向翻转课堂的“太极环模型I”的基础上,构建了面向翻转会议的“太极环模型II”。与翻转课堂一样．翻转会议的有效实施也离不开O2O环境中各种信息化软硬件平台的技术支撑,,通过对翻转会议理论概念、组织模式与技术平台的阐释,以期为O2O环境中学术会议的有效组织与创新发展,提供一些借鉴与参考     

翻转课堂模式在大学英语口语教学中的应用

翻转课堂以现代网络技术和资源为依托,重构教学流程,该模式对英语教学有重要启示。文章对翻转课堂模式在大学英语口语教学中的应用进行了探讨,认为在教学中实施翻转课堂教学模式能提高学生的英语应用能力。     

基于翻转课堂的化学实验教学模式及支撑系统研究

"翻转课堂"是利用信息技术来实现教育创新的成果,翻转课堂教学模式中学生通过信息技术在课前进行课堂知识的学习,知识的内化则在课堂上、教师的指导下完成。这种教学理念对解决化学实验教学中学生实验时间不足、动手机会少的问题具有一定的参考价值。根据化学实验教学的特点,提出了化学实验翻转课堂的教学模式,并设计了辅助其教学活动过程的支撑系统,最后结合具体案例来说明在该系统的支撑下化学实验翻转课堂的实施方法。     

Flipping the Calculus Classroom: A Cost-Effective Approach

Abstract

This article discusses a cost-effective approach to flipping the calculus classroom. In particular, the emphasis is on low-cost choices, both monetarily and with regards to faculty time, that make the daunting task of flipping a course manageable for a single instructor. Student feedback and overall impressions are also presented.     

学习、设计与技术——AECT 2014年会评述与思考

2014美国教育传播与技术协会(AECT)国际年会11月4—8日在美国佛罗里达州的杰克逊威尔市召开,来自世界各地近1000名学者、研究生、设计、研究和实践人员参加了本届年会。本次AECT年会共为参会者提供了400多场不同主题的发言以及学习交流和研讨机会。作为AECT 2014年会的组织者与参与者,作者对本届年会的发言内容,包括大会的主题演讲、主席专场报告、分会论坛发言,以及圆桌专题论坛做了全面而详实的报道;同时,根据自己的亲身经历与体会,对年会的主要发言进行了深入的分析,与读者分享对本届年会的感悟以及年会所折射出的教育技术现状与发展趋势。     

大学物理翻转课堂教学效果的准实验研究

上海交通大学于2013－2014年开展了“翻转课堂教学试点研究”。本报告为其中一个子课题的研究成果。本研究采用准实验研究设计和问卷调查法相结合的方法,探讨了“翻转课堂策略的教学效果”、“学生对翻转课堂策略的适应性和倾向性”等问题。本研究对大学物理课的两个平行班分别施以翻转课堂教学和传统讲授教学,进而对比两个班物理测试的分数。研究发现,采用翻转课堂教学的班级分数提高的幅度显著高于采用传统教学的班级,效应量为0.68。问卷调查显示,58%的学生表示“喜欢翻转课堂互动形式的教学”。     

Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education

This paper analyzed the journal publications of mathematics flipped classroom studies in K-12 and higher education contexts. We focused specifically on a set of flipped classroom studies in which pre-class instructional videos were provided prior to face-to-face class meetings. We examined the following four major issues: (a) the types of out-of-class and in-class instructional activities used, (b) the effect of flipped learning on student achievement, (c) the participant perceptions of flipped classroom benefits, and (d) the main challenges of flipped classroom implementations. A meta-analysis of 21 comparison studies showed an overall significant effect in favor of the flipped classroom over the traditional classroom for mathematics education (Hedges' g = 0.298, 95% CI [0.16, 0.44]), with no evidence of publication bias. A broader research synthesis of 61 studies revealed that the flipped classroom approach benefited student learning in three main aspects: increasing in-class time for task/practice, integrating new knowledge with existing beliefs, and real-time feedback. The two most frequently reported flipped classroom challenges were students' unfamiliarity with flipped learning and significant start-up effort on the part of instructors. We hence propose a set of design principles to help foster the transition to the flipped classroom and improve the out-of-class and in-class learning designs. This set of design principles can also provide a more focused agenda for future research to examine the effect of the flipped classroom approach on student learning and motivation.     

Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: a review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model

ABSTRACT

Medical education is a domain with fast-changing knowledge and attention to knowledge application and higher order thinking; therefore, how to implement effective teaching is a crucial issue. Based on the technology-based learning model, this study provides a multi-dimensional analysis of published papers on the flipped classroom in medical education from the SCOPUS database, including the form of the learning materials, learning system or player, learning strategies, educational technology, application domains, research issues, participants, and research methods. Based on the results, the application of flipped classrooms in medical education has grown rapidly over the past decade, with the number growing dramatically from 7 papers in 2014, to 16 papers in 2015, and 22 papers in 2016. It was found that a great number of studies adopted instructional videos uploaded on online learning systems or used existing online videos to conduct before-class teaching in the before-class stage of the flipped classroom; moreover, most studies involved no online discussion in the before-class stage. As for learning strategies in the in-class stage, the most frequently adopted strategies were issue discussion, practicing or doing exercises, and problem-based learning. This implies that most studies mainly emphasized basic knowledge understanding and skills training, while little attention was paid to developing learners’ higher order thinking skills. In addition, the majority of studies explored students’ learning interest/satisfaction, learning experience, and performance on the cognitive aspect, while little research was found to investigate their preparation degree or cognitive loading. Based on the review results, this study provides the research trends and potential research issues of flipped medical education to serve as a reference for researchers, instructors, and decision makers.     

Designing effective,contemporary assessment on a flipped educational sciences course

ABSTRACT

Evidence shows flipped learning increases academic performance and student satisfaction. Yet, often practitioners flip instruction but keep traditional curricula and assessment. Assessment in higher education is often via written exams. But these provide limited feedback and do not ask students to put knowledge into practice. This does not support the tenets of flipped learning. For two years, the author flipped instruction but retained traditional curricula and assessment. However, on the author’s current course, all three aspects were redesigned to better support flipped learning. The aim of this research is to test the effectiveness of this redesign regarding student engagement and satisfaction. Thus, it is asked: How, on this course, can meaningful, continuous assessment be provided as well as effective, personalized feedback, while staying in line with the philosophy of flipped learning? Action research took place from September 2016 to June 2017. Quantitative data from a student survey, and qualitative data from a research diary and student focus group were gathered. What emerged is: a little-and-often assessment approach is effective for learning and engagement; tasks must be authentic and test demonstration of knowledge, not memory; quality, not quantity, is key for student learning; and students desire individualized feedback.