适度超前推动科研基础平台建设 支撑我国高水平科技自立自强

科研基础平台是国家科技创新的基础性、战略性平台。近10年来，我国科研基础平台在科学观测水平、制造工艺水平、数据获取水平、开放共享水平、科学管理水平、开发利用水平方面取得了跨越式发展，高水平支撑我国科技创新活动。展望未来，新的科研范式变革正在悄然到来，新兴科研信息化基础平台不仅支撑重大科技基础设施和野外台站朝着更大规模、更精确、更先进的方向发展，其本身还将对科研范式变革起到重要的推动作用，成为重大科技突破的“加速器”与“倍增器”，成为我国跻身创新型国家前列和迈进世界科技强国的关键支撑。     

Infusing educational technologies in the heart of the university—A systematic literature review from an organisational perspective

Educational technologies have experienced unprecedented prominence on university agendas with many institutions motivated to keep the lessons learned from the COVID-19 sparked transition with regard to online teaching. In response to this renewed interest in ensuring the longevity of educational technologies in higher education, this systematic review analysed the various organisational factors—for example, leadership, infrastructure, strategy—considered essential in the literature for the successful implementation of educational technologies. Specifically, we reviewed 1614 papers published in five prominent educational technology journals in the last decade. From this sample, we identified 47 papers that discussed organisational factors. Drawing on these studies, we constructed an organisational framework, which outlines the different organisational factors, actors and processes involved in implementing educational technologies. The identified organisational factors are structured into three main categories: (1) Leadership and Strategy, (2) Infrastructure and Resources and (3) Recognition and Motivation. Our aim was to further the scholarly understanding of the organisational layer involved in digital change as well as provide concrete recommendations for practitioners.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

• Previous research has stressed the importance of taking organisational factors such as infrastructure, leadership, strategy and staff commitment into account when implementing educational technologies.
• However, review papers have failed to systematically organise these studies to create a comprehensive understanding of the organisational factors involved in implementing educational technologies and ensuring their longevity at an institution.
• There is currently a high level of interest in how educational technologies can be implemented in the higher education landscape, as many institutions are facing the question of what lessons they can learn from the crisis and how they can continue on their path of digitalisation.

What this paper adds

• This review paper addresses a gap in our scholarly understanding of the organisational layers involved in the implementation of educational technologies in higher education institutions (HEIs).
• This paper provides a framework on organisational factors, which influence the implementation of educational technologies in HEIs.
• This review paper demonstrates that bottom-up and opinion leadership, support structures tailored to the need and time of faculty as well as recognition and incentives have the largest impact on a sustainable implementation of educational technologies in HEIs.

Implications for practice and/or policy

• Universities should create structures that enable innovation and creativity by promoting bottom-up and opinion leadership as well as shared decision-making processes as they are important for the successful implementation of educational technologies in HEIs.
• Besides providing a reliable and suitable infrastructure, institutional support and resources in terms of technical advice and training tailored to specific needs, should be in place when planning the implementation of educational technologies in HEIs.
• The additional workload instructors face when implementing digital teaching should be recognised and incentivised as it strengthens instructor engagement which is crucial for the implementation of educational technologies in HEIs.

     

ICT产业合作创新网络结构、演化路径与模式特征研究：基于上市公司的实证分析

基于2007~2018年我国ICT产业上市公司专利合作数据,运用社会网络分析方法对产业合作创新网络的整体特征、演化路径及合作模式进行了系统分析。结果表明：合作创新已成为企业获取竞争优势的重要手段,但合作网络整体仍较为稀疏；网络的演化经历了三个阶段,随着时间推移合作关系数量持续扩大,核心企业地位越加突出；网络具有明显的区域集中特征,创新的主体主要分布在东部沿海省市；从组织视角看,合作模式选择和其发展阶段、技术实力以及所在业务领域特点密切相关。这些发现对改善产业创新合作,应对数字经济新阶段的挑战提供了有益的启示。     

数据基础设施赋能碳达峰碳中和的动态过程机制

面对我国实现碳达峰碳中和面临的系统性认识和行动方案、数字化手段欠缺等挑战，需要从理论层面探究新型数据基础设施如何协同推进数字中国战略和碳达峰碳中和的国家战略。本文基于对数据要素驱动创新发展和数据基础设施赋能行业数智化的本质特征分析，建构“数据－机制－使能”过程视角下数据基础设施赋能“双碳”的动态整合理论框架，系统论述碳中和数据银行的系统架构和这一新型数据基础设施助力碳达峰碳中和、实现多维价值创造的多层次动态过程机制；同时指出该机制面临数据基础设施运行成本高、区域行业数智化和低碳化高质量发展协同难度大，以及“双碳”多线程、多路径目标实现阻力大等现实挑战，并提出通过制度创新和技术创新双轮驱动、打通碳达峰碳中和数据融通壁垒、健全和完善新时代数据基础设施等对策。     

SEP免费政策会导致SSO成员离开吗？——基于ICT行业的实证分析

基于Searle Center Database,用生存分析方法分析SEP免费政策对SSO成员生存率的影响。研究表明在ICT行业中,SEP免费政策反而会提高成员的生存率,当成员同时加入多个SSO或在其他SSO中声明SEP时,这种效应尤其明显。认为在复杂技术行业中,技术供给企业可能存在着迂回获利模式,SSO可以改进政策制定思路避免陷入"标准推广or标准质量"的两难选择。     

数字经济关键信息基础设施安全保护义务:治理体系与改革建议

以《关键信息基础设施安全保护条例》为切入点，梳理分析运营者履行安全保护义务的主要环节与具体内容，评述现有治理体系的进步与不足，提出运营者应树立弹性安全的网络安全治理观念、完善网络安全信息共享制度、优化建立全生命周期的供应链安全管理体系的改革建议。     

农业科研信息化发展态势与“十四五”展望

通过对科研信息化的内容和国外发展进程的阐述，分析凝练了当前农业科研信息化发展三大态势：一是数据密集型科研范式推动新型科研信息化基础设施建设，二是科研信息化成为农业科研治理体系现代化的重要抓手，三是人工智能等新一代信息技术加速与农业科研活动交互融合。进而提出了“十四五”农业科研信息化发展五项建议：一是完善科研信息化高质量发展生态体系，二是加速推进新一代科研息化基础设施建设，三是提升农业科研大数据汇聚与计算能力，四是重视科研信息化应用效果，五是加强复合型科研信息化人才队伍建设。     

金砖国家信息通信技术/数字化发展水平研究

基于国际电信联盟（ITU）曾经使用的信息通信技术发展指数（旧IDI），提出改进的信息通信技术/数字化发展指数（新IDI）。2007年以来，金砖五国信息化和数字经济水平均有较大提升，其中四国的信息通信技术（ICT）/数字化发展水平已达到或接近G20国家中等水平。金砖五国中，俄罗斯ICT接入指数最高，中国、南非和印度ICT接入情况得到了明显改善；中国ICT应用指数增长近3倍，其他四国也在ICT应用领域得到显著提高；在ICT技能上，俄罗斯、中国与南非已有超过90%、巴西为超过85%的国民拥有互联网上交流和使用的条件；总体看来，俄罗斯相关发展水平长期领先，中国、巴西与南非居中，印度与其他四国有一定差距。相比2007年，金砖国家平均信息通信技术/数字化发展指数（IDI）水平在2020年时和G20平均水平的差距已大幅缩小，主要得益于其网络建设和普及。分析表明，IDI与各国在信息通信领域发表的SCI论文数和WOS中的非SCI论文数（不考虑2020年）存在正相关，中国以及巴俄印三国（不考虑2020年）专利数量与IDI指数之间具有一定的正相关，巴西、俄罗斯、南非三国的IDI与本国人均生产总值的关联度不显...     

数字创新创业实现共同富裕的机理和证据

数字创新创业赋予了共同富裕新动能，正加快经济社会形成共创共富的生动局面。理论分析表明，数字创新创业对共同富裕的影响兼具鸿沟效应和红利效应，鸿沟效应在先期强于红利效应、在后期弱于红利效应，数字创新创业与共同富裕之间呈现U形关系；居民收入结构在因果链条中发挥了中介作用，数字基础设施发挥了调节功能。实证结果显示，数字创新创业对共同富裕的影响呈现“先降后升”的U形特征，并且稳健成立；异质性分析发现，U形关系在共同富裕的“头部”省份呈“细口尖底”形态，在“腰尾部”省份则呈“宽口平底”形态；南部省份整体上早于北部省份实现了由鸿沟效应向红利效应的转变；机制检验发现，数字创新创业正是通过影响经营性收入与工资性收入之比间接地作用于省域共同富裕，数字基础设施正向调节数字创新创业与共同富裕之间的U形关系。研究结果为厘清数字创新创业影响共同富裕的内在机理提供了理论逻辑和经验证据，为实现共同富裕目标提出了新思路和新途径。