大学图书馆现代化指南针报告

教育部高等学校图书情报工作指导委员会和北京大学图书馆合作研制《大学图书馆现代化指南针报告》,报告主要采用德尔菲法对34位图书馆学、情报学领域的专家和学者进行了三轮意见征询,集成专家智慧,总结出大学图书馆现代化在核心理念、主要目标、实际问题、理论问题、关键要素和生态关系等方面的发展趋势,为实现大学图书馆内涵式发展、整体发展、高质量发展、科学发展、可持续发展提供方向指引,成为新时代新征程上大学图书馆谋划新思路、推动新发展、构建新格局的“指南针”。     

上海图书馆国际文献交换发展的SWOT分析

应用SWOT分析方法对上海图书馆国际文献交换的优势、劣势、机遇、威胁进行分析,并基于SWOT分析方法提出了四种战略,即SO战略、WO战略、ST战略和WT战略.在国际交换过程中,上海图书馆交换工作必须扬长避短,在提高文献质量的基础上,建设自己的特色,提高自己的竞争实力,在此基础上,结合文献交换市场的相关特征,笔者对上海图书馆国际文献交换今后如何发展提出了一些对策和建议.     

论高校图书馆核心竞争力

论文提出图书馆的核心竞争力是图书馆独特的资源和能力，学科服务是高校图书馆核心竞争力的核心，学科信息资源建设是高校图书馆核心竞争力的资源基础，学科馆员是高校图书馆核心竞争力的人力资源保障。     

基于社会交换理论的情报学学科互动机制研究

从社会交换理论的视角来考察情报学的学科互动机制，从学科互动中的受馈和回馈两个方面讨论情报学与相关学科的互动，井对互动过程中的动力、存续条件、环境因素等作了进一步的探讨。     

Chinese Studies Librarianship in North America

Although American libraries had begun collecting Chinese language materials in the 19th century, notably the United States Library of Congress in 1869, Yale in 1878, Harvard in 1879, and Berkeley in 1896, East Asian studies librarianship in North America, including China studies librarianship, was not fully developed until the 1960s. There was no formal organization that represented the interest of Chinese studies librarians because there were few of them and most of them were China scholars rather than trained librarians. More than 100 years later, the number of Chinese studies librarians in North America has increased considerably, primarily in response to the demand in the field of China studies and more recently to the needs of immigrant population and the general public who has an interest in China.This paper traces the history and growth of Chinese studies librarianship in North America, documents the development of the professional organization that represents Chinese studies librarians, and exami.     

文献数据库的检索特点及使用技巧

随着高校图书馆引进的中外文数据库及建立的局域网络检索系统 ,教学科研人员有了快捷、高效、准确查获文献信息的硬件环境。为使读者更好地利用各种数据库进行文献检索 ,文章介绍了文献数据库的检索特点 ,并就数据库检索中检索策略制定的技术性问题 ,如 :检索词的选择、检索式的编写等做了详细介绍。     

观念和目标决定效果--关于图书馆信息咨询服务发展模式的探索

图书馆信息咨询服务正面临新的机会与选择，本文分析了制约信息咨询服务发展的原因，讨论了构造图书馆在信息咨询服务领域的核心竞争力问题，研究以个性化信息服务作为切入市场的模式，如何与市场成功对接。     

加强期刊间的学习与交流

期刊是作者与编辑智慧的结晶,每种期刊都有值得他人学习、借鉴之处.加强期刊间的相互学习与交流,有助于及时掌握科技动态和作者信息,提高编辑素质,吸取他人之长补自己之短.     

加强"两课"在高校思想政治教育中主渠道和主阵地作用的思考

从四个方面阐述了“两课”教学中存在的普遍问题,并从提高教师素质、改进教学方法、领导重视三方面提出了创新“两课”教学,发挥其在高校思想政治教育中主渠道和主阵地作用的方法。     

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.