简论美国东亚国书馆事业的发展

指出作为美国图书馆事业的重要组成部分,东亚图书馆对东亚学术研究和东西方文化的交流起到了极大的推动作用;从美国东亚图书馆的起源、馆藏规模、联盟组织、服务方式和内容变革等方面简述美国东亚图书馆事业的最新发展状况;认为如何充分应用新技术来提高服务水平和质量是美国东亚图书馆要研究的重要课题.     

构建基于生命周期方法的政府信息资源管理模型

本文在分析生命周期方法的基础上 ,提出了政府信息资源全生命周期管理的思想 ,并构建了链状、环状和矩阵型三种政府信息资源的全生命周期管理模型。     

谈档案工作"统一领导"与"分级管理"的合理结合

1987年，我国《档案法》明确规定：“档案工作实行统一领导，分级管理的原则”。距今已经十几年了，但在认识上和实践中，仍有不少人简单地将该原则等同于“集中统一管理”原则，片面强调“统一领导，分级管理”的核心和实质就是“集中统一管理”，似乎“集中统一”的程度越高，便显得越正确，越是坚持了原则。这种认识上的误区，直接导致了档案行政管理中统得过死，管得过多，片面性，一刀切，过度强调整齐划一，经常忽视因地制宜等诸多弊端。因此，在档案工作中，     

小学语文教学应用建构主义学习理论的几个问题

小学语文教学要关注小学生的个性特点, 不要把建构主义学习理论当做一种学习模式;在设计教学目标时要考虑学生,教学目标要有层次性;在基于问题式学习中设计的问题要避免浅表化和片面化, 情境的设计要有利于学生的探究。     

谁来评价高中综合素质?——基于利益相关者的分析

从利益相关者的视角来看,综合素质评价结果一旦与学生、教师和高中学校的利益高度相关,那么由这些利益高度相关的主体来进行评价时,由于受到"理性经济人"自利性的制约,利益高相关主体极有可能因自身利益的最大化并最终导致评价结果的失真。评价结果的客观性取决于"评价什么",更取决于"谁来评价",甚至可以说,"谁来评价"会直接影响着"评价什么"。而就综合素质评价的实施来看,学生更多的是综合素质评价材料的记录主体,高中学校(包括行政管理人员和教师等)更多的是综合素质评价材料真实性的监督主体,而高校才是最终、最佳的综合素质评价主体。     

Creating Better Learners Through Learning Science: A Sample of Methods

This article proposes the incorporation of learning science into the programming and operation of public libraries. Learning science, a multidisciplinary field spanning cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, economics, anthropology, and linguistics, has identified proven methods for enhancing learning at any age. The article highlights some of the tools and insights that are most relevant to libraries in their role as centers for informal learning.     

Update: The Invisible Farmer: securing Australian farm women’s history

This article reviews the Invisible Farmer project – the largest study of Australian women on the land – a third of the way through its three year funding period. It introduces the aims of this collaborative and multidisciplinary project, focusing on the role of records and oral histories in the creation of new narratives, and the task of raising public awareness of the important historical and contemporary contributions made by Australian women farmers. We examine the way digital platforms work to curate records and promote research, and outline the important role that the Australian Women’s Register, a core project of the Australian Women’s Archives Project, will play in achieving outcomes.     

生存分析法在学术期刊评价上的应用初探

期刊评价中文献老化理论视角的研究相对薄弱。本文探究生存分析法在学术期刊评价上的应用,在理论上 克服了因领域差异导致的壁垒,并选取CSTPCD中30家中文物理学科期刊作为样本数据集进行实证研究。通过对论文 被引时序数据进行分析,研究物理学科文献老化规律,并选取样本期刊进行对比分析,以探究期刊评价的新思路。     

Google Scholar and Web of Science: Examining gender differences in citation coverage across five scientific disciplines

Many studies demonstrate differences in the coverage of citing publications in Google Scholar (GS) and Web of Science (WoS). Here, we examine to what extent citation data from the two databases reflect the scholarly impact of women and men differently. Our conjecture is that WoS carries an indirect gender bias in its selection criteria for citation sources that GS avoids due to criteria that are more inclusive. Using a sample of 1250 U.S. researchers in Sociology, Political Science, Economics, Cardiology and Chemistry, we examine gender differences in the average citation coverage of the two databases. We also calculate database-specific h-indices for all authors in the sample. In repeated simulations of hiring scenarios, we use these indices to examine whether women's appointment rates increase if hiring decisions rely on data from GS in lieu of WoS. We find no systematic gender differences in the citation coverage of the two databases. Further, our results indicate marginal to non-existing effects of database selection on women's success-rates in the simulations. In line with the existing literature, we find the citation coverage in WoS to be largest in Cardiology and Chemistry and smallest in Political Science and Sociology. The concordance between author-based h-indices measured by GS and WoS is largest for Chemistry followed by Cardiology, Political Science, Sociology and Economics.     

群体性纠纷的示范诉讼解决机理与构造

在群体性纠纷解决过程中, 群意表达易被集体意旨所表征而成为公开文本, 但群体成员个体表意的隐藏文本并不能有效转化为合意而被吸纳其中、 并在最终影响群体司法正义的实现. 既有群体司法虽通过直觉法中的情理因素涵摄以及法庭的非社会化给予响应, 但也由此造成了群体性司法诉讼效率与共识达成的现代化之殇. 德国针对私人投资者建立的首个示范性诉讼立法实践表明: 通过示范诉讼契约吸纳当事人诉讼处分合意,可改善群体司法对每一个当事人的诉讼权保障程度; 通过诉讼退出制, 可协调无法达成 "集体意旨" 的少数当事人另行起诉; 灵活运用包括胜诉酬金制在内的起诉激励, 也在一定程度上纾解了群体性诉讼巨型化的困局.