Gender and research publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality?

Women’s access to academic careers has been historically limited by discrimination and cultural constraints. Comprehensive information about gender inequality within disciplines is needed to understand the problem and target remedial action. India is the fifth largest research producer but has a low international index of gender inequality and so is an important case. This study assesses gender inequalities in Indian journal article publishing in 2017 for 186 research fields. It also seeks overall gender differences in interests across academia by comparing the terms used in 27,710 articles with an Indian male or female first author. The data show that there are at least 1.5 male first authors per female first author in each of 26 broad fields and 2.8 male first authors per female first author overall. Compared to the USA, India has a much lower share of female first authors but smaller variations in gender differences between broad fields. Dentistry, Economics and Maths are all more female in India, but Veterinary is much less female than in the USA. There is a tendency for males to research thing-oriented topics and for females to research helping people and some life science topics. More initiatives to promote gender equality in science are needed to address the overall imbalance, but care should be taken to avoid creating the larger between-field gender differences found in the USA.     

When research assessment exercises leave room for opportunistic behavior by the subjects under evaluation

This study inserts in the stream of research on the perverse effects that PBRF systems can induce in the subjects evaluated. The authors’ opinion is that more often than not, it is the doubtful scientific basis of the evaluation criteria that leave room for opportunistic behaviors. The work examines the 2004–2010 Italian national research assessment (VQR) to test the lack of possible opportunistic behavior by universities in order to limit the penalization of their performance (and funding) due to the presence of scientifically unproductive professors in faculty. In particular, institutions may have favored “gift authorship” practices. The analysis thus focuses on the output of professors who were unproductive in the VQR publication window, but became productive (“new productives”) in the following five years. A number of universities show a higher than average share of publications by new productives that are in co-authorship exclusively with colleagues from the same university. Although this might be thought to reflect opportunistic behavior by universities, the empirical evidence does not support this assumption.     

对乒乓球专项学生腕膝关节损伤的调查与研究

乒乓球运动是技战能主导类隔网对抗性项目,易致腕膝关节损伤。运用文献综述法和问卷调查法等研究方法,对华中师范大学体育学院乒乓球专项学生腕膝关节发生运动损伤的次数、时间、原因、伤后急救处理措施、恢复正常运动水平所需时长以及伤后对运动能力、心理的影响等方面进行调查分析,并针对这些问题提出相应的建议和预防措施,为乒乓球运动损伤的预防和处理提供理论参考。     

四川省体育后备人才实行“体教结合”培养模式的研究

本研究通过文献查找、阅读,找到目前国内外体育后备人才培养模式优势,了解近2年四川省体育后备人才培养模式,通过对四川省多个地市州业余体校的教练、队员进行问卷调查和对四川省个别项目的专业队教练队员进行问卷调查,分析影响我省竞技体育后备人才培养因素,并借鉴世界体育强国的一些培养模式,结合我国国情,探索出四川体育后备人才＂体教结合＂培养模式新思路,对新时期我省竞技体育后备人才培养模式改革提出探索性见解。     

黑龙江省速滑三线后备人才培养现状及发展对策研究

速滑是黑龙江省的优势项目,在黑龙江省有很广泛的群众基础,多年来涌现出了很多优秀的速滑运动员。通过对黑龙江省速滑三线后备人才培养现状的调查,分析黑龙江省速滑三线后备人才培养存在的问题及解决办法。以期为黑龙江省速滑后备人才培养的理论研究提供支持。     

论高校自然科学学报研究会工作的“务虚”与“务实”

"务虚"是一种理论上的认同,"务实"则是认同之下并在理论指导下的实际工作。"务虚"与"务实"是事物发展中具有辩证统一的两个方面,"虚"与"实"在高校自然科学研究会中具有难以替代的作用。从高校自然科学学报研究会到各省的高校学报研究会,自上而下地所开展的一系列活动就充分说明了"务虚"与"务实"是互为补充的,并在此过程中使其达到坚持学术性与应用性理论研究融合并举,彰显学术特色,健全学报运行机制等目的。探讨此范例,可利于我国学报研究会的实践运作。     

论纸质图书的不可替代性——基于历史文化研究价值和艺术价值的视角

现今电子图书的大量涌现,使纸质图书面临着巨大的挑战。但纸质图书具备独特的历史文化研究价值和艺术价值,并可以给读者带来鲜明的情感体验,因此纸质图书并不会被电子图书所取代,这也充分证明了纸质图书在未来图书馆保存和发展中的必要性。     

词频分析法在学科发展动态研究中的应用综述

词频分析法能够用于揭示某一学科的发展动态和研究进展。本文通过对国内词频分析法的相关学术期刊论文(112篇)进行梳理和挖掘,总结了词频分析法目前的主要运用学科领域和发展阶段,分析了词频分析法在运用中的数据处理与计量方法,发现了词频分析法在运用中存在的问题,在此基础上,对词频分析法的未来发展进行了展望,提出词频分析法的运用改进措施。     

引文分析领域研究热点前沿与高频作者的二维时空分析

以国内引文分析领域的3401篇论文作为样本,统计其30年间的年代分布状况;分析该领域的高频作者;借助CiteSpaceⅡ突变检测算法检测到引文分析领域的研究热点及前沿术语。运用CiteSpaceⅡ提供的复杂混合网络的可视化方法,将研究热点、研究前沿与作者建立空间上和时间上的对应关系,从空间和时间两个维度揭示我国引文分析领域研究热点的作者分布,研究前沿的作者分布以及引领引文分析研究前沿的关键作者。     

高校LIS教师群体中的“小同行”研究（2001-2010年）

一个学科内“小同行”数量和质量是衡量学科发展水平的重要指标。论文对我国高校LIS学科高级专家群体CSSCI来源期刊论文的统计分析,初步区分出61位高产专家中的14个“小同行”群体。并对我国LIS学科“小同行”群体发育水平较低的原因进行剖析。