大学生对奖学金评定结果归因倾向研究

探究大学生对奖学金评定结果的归因倾向,有利于了解当代大学生的归因特征,有利于评估高校奖学金评选工作的规范性。以《大学生对奖学金评定结果归因倾向问卷》对河西学院1031名大学生进行了问卷调查,结果表明：大学生对奖学金评定结果显著地倾向于内归因;男生更倾向于将奖学金评定的结果归因为客观因素,女生更倾向于归因于自身因子;随着年级的升高,学生越来越倾向于外界因子、运气因子等客观因子;理科学生更加倾向于客观因子的归因。     

基于多层次关联分析的高职院校奖学金评定模型

奖学金是对优秀学生的鼓励,奖学金的评定应该能较好地反映学生的综合能力,其评定方法在一定程度上影响着其对学生的激励作用。依据高职教育的培养目标,将灰色关联分析法和层次分析法结合起来,建立基于多层次灰色关联分析的高职院校学生奖学金评定模型,对学生的表现进行综合评价,得出奖学金评定结果。     

大学生对奖学金评定结果归因倾向问卷的编制及信效度研究

学生对奖学金评定结果的归因直接影响着学生对社会公平的认知及学习的努力程度。以调查法和测验法相结合的形式,以维纳的归因理论和阿特金森的期望——价值理论构建了大学生对奖学金评定结果归因倾向的8个维度,对自编的59道题进行了因素分析,确定32道题作为大学生对奖学金评定结果归因倾向问卷的最终题本;对题本进行了信度及效度分析,结果表明,大学生对奖学金评定结果归因倾向问卷具有良好的信度及效度,符合心理测量学的要求。     

高校奖助学金制度的价值导向浅析

奖助学金制度是校园文化精神引领的重要体现,其价值取向和激励方向不但是制度能否公平合理实施的关键,而且会影响奖助学金的评定工作和学生的日常管理和教育。奖助学金评选中的价值"众生相",削弱了奖助学金应有的人文关怀和价值引导功能。奖助学金制度要发挥其正向激励和价值导向功能,从完善奖励机制体系、加强过程教育、建构后期管理机制、塑造精神奖助体系来实现物质帮助和精神提升的双重价值引导效果。     

博耶报告20年：教学学术的制度化进程

本文回顾和评价了卡内基教学促进基金会前主席欧内斯特·博耶发表《学术反思》后的20年里,国际上教学学术在制度化方面取得的进展。这一进展表现在：学术界对教学学术内涵的丰富和分化;教学学术的专业组织和成果出版的完善;教学学术评价制度的加强;各国和地区在国家和院校层面教学学术实践的多样化发展。文章最后提出教学学术进一步发展面临的挑战和对未来的展望。     

民国时期中文报纸的英文学术研究——对一个新兴领域的初步观察

本文概述了最近几十年英文论著中关于中国民国时期报纸研究的情况,梳理了近期包括文学研究者、历史学家在内的大量重要研究成果,分析了这个领域的现有研究主题,如民国报纸与民主主义、上海的民国报纸、民国报纸与中国新闻业的职业化、跨国视角下的民国报纸等。论文还提出了未来研究民国时期报纸的几个亟待解决的问题。     

Intercultural Communication Scholarship in the U.S. Heartland

This essay works to debunk the myth that the Central States region is a less-than-ideal location for intercultural communication scholarship. The essay also explores how co-cultural theorizing scholarship—a product of living/teaching/learning in the Midwest—reflects a significant contribution to intercultural communication scholarship.     

The scholarship of teaching and learning from a social justice perspective

We argue that there is a reciprocal relationship between all scholarly activities, most importantly between teaching, learning, research and professional learning. The article builds on the work of others who call for a social justice approach to inform the SoTL. It focuses on the implications for professional learning, as an aspect of the SoTL which has been neglected. The tripartite account of participatory parity as advanced by Nancy Fraser is shown to be a valuable frame to describe instances of social justice, as well as the kind of institutional arrangements that should be instituted to support participatory parity. Alongside this, the notion of a ‘pedagogy of discomfort’ is shown to be an effective, but challenging means to advance awareness of justice and injustice amongst academics. The article draws on examples from three action based research projects run by the authors.     

对来华留学政府奖学金政策的审思——基于来华留学研究生的学习经验感知

高等教育的国际化发展使中国人才流失的问题日益凸显。通过对来华留学政府奖学金生的学习经验感知进行探究发现,中国文化与汉语是吸引其前来的重要动力;尽管在学段和专业方面存在差异,但来华留学政府奖学金生学习过程的整体满意度较高,收获了预期的内容;毕业后的回流意向明确。从人才流动的视角反思来华留学政府奖学金政策得出,一方面,中国政府为世界人才的培育贡献了巨大力量,有力推动了世界人才环流。但同时此种借助资本换取人才的策略所产生的社会综合效益较低,政治和文化的外交意义仍是发展来华留学教育的轴心。因此提升来华留学教育质量及完善相关政策是吸引人才的重要途径。     

Lesson study: A collaborative approach to scholarship for teaching and learning in higher education

The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning has become an important field of inquiry, focusing on the development of new and critical pedagogic approaches in higher education. It is a broad field leading to the emergence of a number of contrasting perspectives concerning the development of insights into teaching and learning. In this article, we explore the potential for Lesson Study to act as a framework for reflecting on and developing pedagogic practice in the university sector. Originating in Japan over a century ago, Lesson Study is a collaborative tool for analysing and developing understanding of student learning. This makes it an ideal tool for capturing and interrogating new and critical insights into teaching and learning. An outline framework is suggested for developing the use of Lesson Study in higher education and we discuss how it can form a positive methodology for extending the work of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.