协同创新视角下高职院校图书馆构建社会化信息服务平台的探索与研究

协同创新是高职院校图书馆开展社会化服务的新动力.高职院校图书馆的社会化服务对象主要面向行业产业和地方区域,具有自己独特的优势和特色.高职院校图书馆构建基于协同创新的社会化信息服务平台要实现可持续发展,需要相应的保障机制.     

高校图书馆社会服务的实践与思考

论文总结广州城市职业学院图书馆近几年开展的社会服务,指出社会服务重在践行现代图书馆开放的服务理念,应加强社会服务的宣传,简化服务手续,建立长效的运行机制,并依托职业教育资源优势开展社区学习信息服务.     

我国高校图书馆社会服务调查研究——以“211工程”高校图书馆为例

论文以112所“211工程”高校图书馆为调查对象,主要运用网站和问卷调查法,着重从高校图书馆社会服务意识、服务对象、服务内容、服务障碍方面进行调查,总结我国高校图书馆社会服务取得的成绩及不足,针对不足,提出了几点发展建议。     

研究项目中课题组成员关系的差序格局探析——以图情文类国家社科基金项目为例

社会学家费孝通先生在研究中国乡村结构时提出了差序格局的概念,用以说明中国传统社会不同于西方社会“团体格局”的特点.差序格局的形成受到以下因素影响：血缘、地缘、经济水平、政治地位、知识文化水平.本研究以2005-2010年图情文类国家社科基金项目为样本,运用社会网络分析方法,分别从地缘、业缘和学缘三个方面探讨了研究项目课题组成员中反映出的关系和结构,探究并验证在课题研究中是否存在“差序结构”,并分析这种差序格局对学术研究的影响.     

基于社会网络分析的国内系统动力学研究分析

本文以CNKI为数据源,从文献计量的角度,对2000—2014年国内系统动力学领域发表的文献进行统计分析。利用社会网络分析方法生成研究成果年限分布图、关键词共现矩阵、关键词共现图谱和作者合作度图谱,剖析了国内系统动力学领域的研究前沿与研究热点。     

隐私保护研究

伴随着数字化网络技术的发展和应用,许多社交网站被创建,使得关于个人的大量信息被收集和发布。为了能够安全地利用社交网站进行信息交流,社交网站在发布数据的同时也要对用户的个人隐私进行必要的保护,本文对社交网络发布的个人信息隐私保护进行了总结,阐述了个人隐私保护模型,指出了社交网络在数据发布时隐私保护存在的待解决的问题以及面临的挑战。     

关于高校图书馆社会化服务社会认同问题的思考

在阐述社会认同理论与高校图书馆社会化服务概念的基础上,从理论和实践两方面论述了高校图书馆社会化服务社会认同的状况,并分析了政府部门、图书馆、社会民众以及社会组织三者对高校图书馆社会化服务的社会认同影响,最后提出了增强高校图书馆社会化服务社会认同的策略。     

浅谈移动电子商务社交APP软件发展趋势

随着互联网和移动通信技术的迅速发展,移动电子商务正逐渐成为一种新的商业运作模式,并以其快捷方便、无所不在的特点,成为现代商务发展的新方向。本文从分析移动电子商务的应用优势入手,针对社交APP软件现状及发展前景进行研究。     

In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry

Processes of designing for systemic innovation for sustainable development (SD) through the lens of three long-term case studies are reported. All case studies, which originated from the SLIM (Social Learning for the Integrated Management and Sustainable Use of Water at Catchment Scale) Project, funded within the EU Fifth Framework Program (2001–2004), constitute inquiry pathways that are explored using a critical incident approach. The initial starting conditions for each inquiry pathway are compared; significant pathway dependencies are identified which foster the development of social learning processes locally, but constrain their uptake and embedding across the wider system of interest. In the first case study, in England & Wales, promising developments in the application of social learning approaches to river basin planning over an initial 3-year period were subsequently marginalised, only to resurface towards the end of the 10-year period of study. In the second, South African case study, significant spaces for social learning and innovation in integrated water resources management were opened up over a five year period but closed down again, primarily as the result of lack of policy support by national government. The third, Italian, case study was designed to assess options for adapting to climate change by opening up new learning spaces between researchers, stakeholders and policy makers. A case for investing in local level systemic innovation through social-learning praxis design approaches and in learning processes around well contextualised case-studies is supported. However, concomitant investment by policy makers in social learning as an alternative, but complementary, governance mechanism for systemic innovation for SD is needed.     

Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention

This paper analyzes organizations’ attempts to entice external contributors to submit suggestions for future organizational action. While earlier work has elaborated on the advantages of leveraging the knowledge of external contributors, our findings show that organizational attempts to attract such involvement are likely to wither and die. We develop arguments about what increases the likelihood of getting suggestions from externals in the future, namely through (1) proactive attention (submitting internally developed suggestions to externals to stimulate debate) and (2) reactive attention (paying attention to suggestions from externals to signal they are being listened to), particularly when those suggestions are submitted by newcomers. Findings from an analysis of about 24,000 initiatives by organizations to involve external contributors suggest these actions are crucial for receiving suggestions from external contributors. Our results are contingent upon the stage of the initiative because organizations’ actions exert more influence in initiatives that lack a history of prior suggestions. Our work has implications for scholars of open innovation because it highlights the importance of considering failures as well successes: focusing exclusively on initiatives that reach a certain stage can lead to partial or erroneous conclusions about why some organizations engage external contributors while others fail.