韩国赋学三题

科举试＂赋＂、创作赋体作品和爱重《文选》,是韩国赋学兴起的首要条件,而韩国大学的中文系、就读中国的留学生等是其中国赋研究复兴的当代学缘背景。《文选》所选楚汉魏晋六朝赋的研究是韩国20世纪中国赋研究复兴的起点,而唐赋研究是其重要的成绩,中国赋与书画研究搭起了赋学与书艺辨伪之学的＂桥梁＂,中韩赋家赋作的比较研究开创了国际赋学的新＂亮点＂。韩国中国赋研究的理论基础是中国赋论及哲学、史学、儒家诗学等,立论细腻完整、学风严谨不乏创新是其学术风格。     

“课例研究”:本土经验及多种形态(下)

在我国的"课例研究"推进中,明显存在以日本"授业研究"为标杆的倾向。本土经验或被遗弃、或被遮蔽,本土强有力的"课例研究"被自我边缘化。我国"课例研究"具有多种形态,如"课例"作为研究成果的表达形式、"课例"作为研究对象"、课例"作为所研究问题的载体、作为研修内容或研修方式的"课例研究"等。发掘、弘扬本土经验,尤其是从本土经验中提炼针对本土教育教学问题的行之有效的研究方法,具有十分重要的意义。     

教育技术历史研究的意义与价值——从传播学作为教育技术的理论基础说开去

传播学是否是教育技术的理论基础？理论基础必须能对领域的研究与实践产生持续性的影响。历史视域中的传播学、系统科学与教育技术之间存在复杂微妙的关系。历史的真实是：传播学是教育技术与系统论结缘的中介,对教育技术的影响并不是持续的。立足于这一历史事实,我们既可以厘清“教学设计”（ID）与“教学系统设计”（ISD）之间的微妙差异,又可以辨识20世纪80年代中美两国关于教育技术“形似而质异”的“电”、“教”论争的实质：中国解决的是教育技术学科归属的问题,美国解决的是学科深层发展的问题。我们应当在对历史的认知中推进教育技术的学科建设,教育技术的学科建设不仅需要历史研究,更需要正确的方法论指导。     

泉州学研究的经典之作——读李亦园教授《“泉州学”的新视野》

国际知名人类学家李亦园教授在＂海峡两岸泉州学研讨会＂（1999年10月）上的主题演讲《＂泉州学＂的新视野》是泉州学研究的经典之作,对泉州学的学科定位、研究内容、研究方法等均作了精辟的阐述,对泉州学研究的深入开展,具有十分深远的指导意义。     

浅谈创新性学习

创新性学习是一种新的学习方式,是对传统学习方式的继承和改革。创新性学习是我国面对新时代挑战的必然选择,是教育改革和发展的需要,也是培养学生创新能力和实践能力的需要。因此,在培养学生创新性学习时,首先应采取多种形式激发学生兴趣;其次提供良好的课堂气氛,为创新性学习铺路;再次利用作业,增加学生创新性学习的范围;第四充实课外活动,扩大学生创新性学习的阵地;最后开展研究性学习,推动和促进创新性学习。     

Predicting Study Abroad Intentions Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior

The emphasis on study abroad programs is growing in the academic context as U.S. based universities seek to incorporate a global perspective in education. Using a model that has underpinnings in the theory of planned behavior (TPB), we predict students’ intention to participate in short‐term study abroad program. We use TPB to identify behavioral, normative, and control beliefs pertinent to the study abroad context. Our research model hypothesizes that intention is predicted by affordability, willingness to pay, and desire. Moreover, willingness to pay is explained by future job prospects, family expectations, and administrative support. We believe that the elements of TBP are reflective of categories of factors that have been demonstrated as important in the context of short‐term study abroad decisions, but that have not been included in previous studies applying TPB to a study abroad context. We test our research model through a survey of 254 undergraduate business students at a southern U.S. university, and find support for all our hypotheses. Results from our study aid in the understanding of students’ decision‐making process to participate in a short‐term study abroad program and have implications for education and learning in the study abroad context. We also contribute to the extant research in TPB by applying it to the context of studying abroad programs and by identifying, and finding support for, a mediated relationship between beliefs and intentions.     

高职科学思维能力训练课程学生自主学习引导策略研究

科学思维能力训练作为高职院校新设立的一门数学类课程,若采取传统讲授式授课方式,学生学习的积极性将会大大降低.此时,教师需要改变角色,引导学生进行自主学习课程,通过改变教师传统的教学方式以及引导自主学生的学习达到良好的教学效果.在授课过程中,教师通过遵循一定的原则和方法培养学生自主学习能力,在引导学生自主学习的过程中要发挥引导者、组织者、解难者的作用.学生掌握自主学习的能力后会在以后的学习生活中获得最佳效果.     

在纷扰中寻出一点闲静——《从百草园到三味书屋》主题浅析

鲁迅先生的《从百草园到三味书屋》,为众多学子欣赏品鉴。但文章的主题,一直以来众说纷纭,有些教参认为文章旨在批判封建教育制度;本文试着从以下几个角度去解析探讨文章的主题。     

How to study a matrix

This study investigated how best to study a matrix. Fifty-three participants studied a matrix topically (1 column at a time), categorically (1 row at a time), or in a unified way (all at once). Results revealed that categorical and unified study produced higher: (a) performance on relationship and fact tests, (b) study material satisfaction, and (c) associative strategy use than topical study. A supplemental study examined the benefits of adding signals to the unified matrix. Results showed that signaling produced greater use of global associative strategies and greater learning of global relationships. Findings were explained with respect to cognitive load theory. Implications for studying matrices were as follows: (1) do not just study a matrix topically, (2) study a matrix categorically, and (3) study a matrix in a unified way, but do so in a way that fosters comparative associations across multiple topics and categories.     

Equalization of the Burden of Capital Outlay in a State’s Minimum Educational Program

ABSTRACT

The author aimed to investigate the variability in science achievement as a function of student-, school- and country-level factors. Achievement scores of 134,123 eighth-grade students from 4,511 schools of 29 countries who participated in the 2007 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study were analyzed. Multilevel modeling results showed that science achievement was driven largely by student-level factors. Students scored higher when they had more self-confidence in learning science, came from home with a higher level of family background, were boys, spent less time on nonacademic activities, and did job at home. Schools averaged higher when they had positive school climate, were located in urban areas, and there was no problem with attendance at school and shortages in resources for science instruction.