贯通生死的终极之典--《生命观视阈中的藏族丧葬文化研究：对金沙江上游三岩峡谷的田野调查》述评

丧葬是“一种永远的文化”,是文化人类学研究的重要课题之一。对于丧葬文化的研究及其成果,堪称贯通生死的终极之典。《生命观视阈中的藏族丧葬文化研究：对金沙江上游三岩峡谷的田野调查》一书以“生”的视阈理解、诠释藏族社会的丧葬文化,具有藏族丧葬民族志研究的开拓意义,是一部贯通生死研究的终极之典,也为我们架设了一座认知与理解他者文化变迁的虹桥。     

语篇语法与精读课一体化模式探讨

语篇语法脱离了句法层面的分析,从超句的层次把握句子和段落之间的关系,解读语流中话语或篇章的含义。文章基于语法三大元功能之语篇功能的理论基础,探讨了主位结构、信息结构、衔接系统在英语专业精读课上的应用,并联系语境分析把握语篇外部环境对语篇的影响,改变传统语法课的教学模式,使语法课与精读课一体化,更有利于语法教学的持续、有效开展。     

3D技术教育应用创新透视

3D技术是虚拟现实、实时仿真和交互三维设计结合产生的关键技术,包括3D显示技术、3D虚拟现实技术和3D打印技术。目前3D技术已成为桌面技术(3D显示技术和3D虚拟现实技术为桌面显示技术,3D打印技术为桌面制造技术),正逐渐在知识创新、深度学习、虚拟实验、技能训练等方面彰显优势,为教育应用创新提供新环境、新平台、新资源、新工具和新范式。然而由于产品价格较为昂贵,后续的保养、管理及维修等费用也较高,3D技术教育应用在顶层设计、技术支持、教育资源、测评标准、应用领域、人才培养等方面仍面临较多困难。3D技术教育应用是一个教育生态系统,是依托3D技术、资源、工具、平台、产品、人才和课程,构建教学资源、教学媒体和教学产品的设计、开发、运用、管理和评价的教育系统,需要进行理论、技术与应用的协同推进,从生态发展、产业推进、深度融合视角开展研究。在落实《教育信息化十年发展规划(2011-2020年)》之际,应将"3D技术教育应用创新"作为技术与教育"深度融合"的重要途径,构建3D教育应用生态系统环境,促进教学方式与学习方式变革,以此应对第三次工业革命带来的机遇和挑战。     

德国科研机构评估及其启示

对科研机构的评估是目前国内乃至国际学术界都十分重视的问题，本 文结合国内 现有的科研评估情况，借鉴德意志研究联合会（DFG）2003年资助与排序的年度报告的评估 排序方法，分析和讨论在我国高校科研评估中应当注意的一些问题。     

我国阅读推广主题研究综述

近年来,我国掀起了阅读推广的研究热潮,涌现出了大量的研究文献。论文对现有文献按研究主题进行梳理和评述,以期对后续研究提供借鉴。     

图书情报学合著网络研究：基于CSSCI基金论文的可视化分析

研究发现,图书情报领域的合著率处于人文社会科学的中等水平,且以2～3人的小规模合著为主导模式;同时发现基金论文有着较高的合著率,基金项目、科研团队、论文产出之间有深刻的内在联系,共同承担重大基金项目往往成为团队形成的内在机制.近年来,图书情报学已经形成“三主多辐”型庞大合著网络,跨省区、跨机构合著、区域学术融合仍亟待加强.     

“信息系统管理的关键问题＂研究模式的发展与特征术——以1980—2012年关键问题研究报告的内容分析为基础

始于1980年的“信息系统管理的关键问题”研究在管理信息系统学科已经形成了较为完整的研究体系和研究模式。文章采用内容分析法对世界范围内29次最具代表性的相关研究进行梳理,将其32年的发展历史概括为奠基期、改良期和重塑期,并以此为基础,总结出关键问题研究模式的重要特征。     

从SCI论文统计分析看瓜尔豆研究进展

根据Web ofScience收录论文的统计数据,分析了国际瓜尔豆研究的进展和学科领域的研究情况,根据瓜尔豆的研究成果在SCI收录论文上所反映发生的差异和变化,并以此为依据,对瓜尔豆领域的研究、应用和发展提出了意见。     

A new industry creation and originality: Insight from the funding sources of university patents

Scientific breakthroughs coming from universities can contribute to the emergence of new industries, such as in the case of biotechnology. Obviously, not all research conducted in universities leads to a radical change from existing technological trajectories. Patents and patent dynamics have long been recognized as critical in understanding the emergence of new technologies and industries. Specifically, patent citations provide insight into the originality of a discovery that has received patent protection. Yet while a large body of literature addresses the impact of patent originality on various firm performance measures, we address the question of what conditions drive patent originality in the process of knowledge creation within the university. Using data on patented cancer research, we examine how research context – as reflected by the funding source for each scientist – is associated with patent originality. We find that when university scientists are partly funded by their own university, they have a higher propensity to generate more original patents. By contrast, university scientists funded either by industry or other non-university organizations have a lower propensity to generate more original patents. The significance of our findings in the cancer research setting call for further research on this question in other research fields.     

Managing research and innovation networks: Evidence from a government sponsored cross-industry program

Important innovations are increasingly produced based on research engagement and fertilization across industries. However, we know little about the challenges associated with managing innovation networks in specific contexts that involves researchers in cross-industry collaboration. Against this backdrop, we draw on theory on design and orchestration of innovation networks to analyze a large-scale government sponsored program, “ProcessIT Innovations” that was designed to increase competitiveness and accelerate economic growth in Northern Sweden. The program was initiated and led by firms from the traditionally strong local process industry and engaged local researchers and firms from the emerging IT industry. Based on our analyses, we offer two contributions. First, we provide a detailed analysis of the challenges related to configuration of the network, orchestration of partnerships between participants, and facilitation of innovation in dedicated development projects. Second, we propose a model of managing research and innovation networks through fertilization across industries and between firms and research institutions.