合并专升本高校图书馆文献资源整合初探

本文针对合并专升本高校图书馆文献资源整合过程中存在的问题，结合本馆实践，对合并后高校图书馆文献资源整合的思路和方法做了一些探讨。参考文献4。     

基于服务创新视角的科技文献共享平台建设研究

科技文献资源是科技创新的重要支撑,推动科技文献资源更好地服务于创新是建立科技文献共享平台的主 要目的。以武汉科技信息共享服务平台为例,从科技信息资源、人才队伍、服务体系、服务内容、服务效果等方面分 析了平台现状;从服务对象和服务需求等方面分析了平台建设过程中遇到的问题和挑战。最后以服务创新为目的,从 需求导向、线上线下相结合、产学研政联合、扩大宣传、完善管理制度等方面提出了对策建议。     

我国西部城市社区体育现状与发展对策的研究——以西安市为例

运用文献资料和问卷调查等研究方法,围绕我国西部城市社区居民参加体育锻炼情况、"全民健身工程"的使用、社区体育组织形式、社区开展体育活动及社区体育发展中存在的主要问题进行调查与分析.在此基础上,提出我国西部城市社区体育发展的对策:加快西部城市社区建设工作;解放思想,转变观念,进一步提高对社区体育的认识;大力加强社区体育场地设施建设;增加社区体育专项资金投入;加快社会体育指导员队伍建设.     

文献资源数据库的个性化服务探析

文章从文献数据库及个性化定义出发,论述了数据库个性化服务的兴起和发展,以及文献数据库系统开展个性化服务的意义,归纳了文献数据库系统获取用户个性化需求的方法及服务模式,总结了文献数据库与个性化服务的未来发展方向。     

文白之争的较量兼及对新文学发展的影响

现代文学史上有关文言文与白话文的论争主要有三次,内容则以其优劣、死话、雅俗、正统与非正统等问题而展开。新文学的拥护者与反对者在正反的较量中,也推动了新文学的向前发展,特别是将新文学的观念日益普及深入到中国更多更广的人群里,所谓真理愈辩愈明,此为一显著事例。     

从对“西点军校”的比较研究看比较军事教育研究应用存在的误区

对"西点军校"的比较研究在比较军事教育中占有相当的篇幅,通过对"西点军校"比较研究的梳理,认为目前在比较军事教育研究中主要存在缺乏严谨、曲解事实和泛泛而论三类问题。通过具体事例分析,提出了在今后的比较军事教育研究中,应特别注重研究教育现象存在的环境、注重挖掘教育现象背后的文化和注重运用量化实证的方法运用对策。     

Learning design and learning analytics in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A systematic review

Mobile and Ubiquitous Learning (m/u-learning) are finding an increasing adoption in education. They are often distinguished by hybrid learning environments that encompass elements of formal and informal learning, in activities that happen in distributed settings (indoors and outdoors), across physical and virtual spaces. Despite their purported benefits, these environments imply additional complexity in the design, monitoring and evaluation of learning activities. The research literature on learning design (LD) and learning analytics (LA) has started to deal with these issues. This paper presents a systematic literature review of LD and LA, in m/u-learning. Apart from providing an overview of the current research in the field, this review elicits elements of common ground between both communities, as shown by the similar learning contexts and complementary research contributions, and based on the research gaps, proposes to: address m/u-learning beyond higher education settings, reinforce the connection between physical and virtual learning spaces, and more systematically align LD and LA processes.     

Do students learn what they teach when generating teaching materials for others? A meta-analysis through the lens of learning by teaching

Students can generate teaching materials for others. However, solid evidence of the learning effect for the student creating the material is needed. This meta-analysis aims to explore current evidence of the learning-by-teaching potential effect on students’ learning of the content they teach. A total of 23 articles were included in the meta-analysis, providing 62 comparisons between an intervention in which students were required to create a teaching material and an alternative condition. Possible moderators were examined as well (i.e., product, educational level, content area, and access to source material). Results show statistically significant differences in favour of creating teaching materials when compared to business-as-usual or alternative interventions, with an overall effect of 0.17. However, the type of product and the access to source material significantly moderate the findings. Audio-visual and visual materials considerably outperform textual materials. Having no access to the source material is better than having full access to it. No publication bias was detected. However, the type of control group moderates the findings: creating teaching materials shows a significant effect when compared to nonbeneficial interventions rather than to other expected beneficial interventions. Nonbeneficial interventions refer to business-as-usual or alternative interventions that are not expected to influence the outcome much, while beneficial interventions are those that are known or expected to have a positive effect. The findings are discussed based on the different views on the underlying learning-by-teaching mechanisms. Limitations as well as implications for practice, policy, and future research are underlined.     

论科技进步对西部开发的影响和作用

如果说以往的西部开发主要是大规模地开发利用其丰富的自然资源，其经济增长是以环境的大规模破坏为代价的，那么，今天的西部开发就应该是，也必须是在一个全新的发展思路、发展模式和发展战略－可持续发展的指导下的开发，今天，科学技术已经成为社会巨系统中一个不可缺少的重要组成部分，要实现西部开发的开发目标，就必须依靠科技进步来完成。     

Exploring knowledge management perspectives in smart city research: A review and future research agenda

There is a growing body of literature calling for work on the emerging role of smart cities as information hubs and knowledge repositories. This article reviews the existing smart city literature and integrates knowledge management perspectives to provide an overview of future research directions. By demonstrating the multi-stakeholder relationships involved in smart city development, it takes a crucial step towards looking into the role of knowledge management in future smart city research. Eighty-two peer-reviewed publications were analyzed covering smart city studies in various research domains. The systematic review identifies five different themes: strategy and vision, frameworks, enablers and inhibitors, citizen participation, and benefits. These themes form the basis for developing a future research agenda focused on knowledge sharing and co-learning among cities via three research directions: socio-technical approaches, knowledge sharing perspectives and organizational learning capabilities. The paper also proposes a series of knowledge-driven policy recommendations to contribute towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals.