A first introduction to archival science

This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation has been avoided. The first of several versions of this First Introduction was written in August 1995. It was meant to meet the need of the Netherlands Archiefschool for a basic text on archival science which could support its different programs for archival education and training. After ample discussion with the archival science teachers of the Archiefschool, it was introduced in the 1995/1996 courses. From then on, it has been used in almost all courses and classes on archival science on the undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate levels and in several training and retraining programs of the Archiefschool. The design of the first version has been maintained in all subsequent versions, including this last one. Still, the text has frequently been adapted as a result of discussions with students and colleagues, in and outside the school. This first English version can almost be deemed as a collective product. Of the numerous colleagues who were engaged in this discussion and contributed to the text, special mention has to be made of Peter Horsman, Hans Scheurkogel, Hans Hofman, Eric Ketelaar, Herman Coppens and Kent Hayworth, who commented the English version. For the final text and all imperfections that may still cling to it I am, of course, responsible. An earlier version in Dutch has been published as: Theo thomassen, “Een korte introductie in de archivistiek”, in: P.J. Horsman, F.C.J. Ketelaar en T.H.P.M. Thomassen (red.),Naar een nieuw paradigma in de archivistiek ('s-Gravenhage, 1999), pp. 11–20.     

邓小平理论开辟了21世纪马克思主义发展的道路

马克思主义在150多年发展过程中,经历了马克思主义、列宁主义、毛泽东思想、邓小平理论几个发展阶段。邓小平理论是马克思主义发展的新阶段,新就新在它的研究重点和理论内容重心,由暴力革命理论向经济建设理论转移。21世纪马克思主义的发展,必须沿着邓小理论开辟的道路继续前进,进一步完善社会主义经济建设理论。     

转型时期高校图书馆的采访工作

简要论述了转型时期高校的特点和新技术在文献传播领域应用后馆藏文献的转向，以及这些因素对采访工作的影响，并提出了新时期图书馆采访工作的思路。     

开展学术争鸣弘扬科学精神--《热带地理》开辟"争鸣园地"栏目的体会

介绍《热带地理》开辟"争鸣园地"栏目的背景和指导思想,以及编辑在引导学术争鸣持续开展,扩大刊物知名度方面的做法、收获和体会.     

学术论文编辑加工原则的哲学思考

编辑活动使既有的文化构成向新的文化构建推进演化,具有创造思维的本质属性.对学术论文的编辑加工原则-简约性、充实性与和谐性进行哲学阐释,在自然界和人类社会寻找这3项原则的客观依据,并对其在编辑工作中的运用做理论与自我实践意义的探索.     

"英年早逝"与高校健康教育

从20世纪80年代到21世纪的今天，“知识精英，英年早逝”的现象不但未能缓解，反有愈演愈烈之势，这一现象已经超越了“纯病理学”范畴，具有社会学意义。就中青年知识分子英年早逝的原因剖析，引发对当前高校健康教育的思考，全面实施健康教育是提高高级专业人才身心健康的主要途径之一。     

参考文献的网络链接及其对中国学术期刊的影响

参考文献的网络链接功能在中国期刊网上已初见端倪.它可以帮助我们探索学术思想的链接关系,追寻学术流派的渊源,发现新兴的交叉学科,预测学科的发展趋势.参考文献的网络链接对学术期刊的标准化、规范化提出了更高的要求,利用其网络链接功能,有利于对学术期刊的稿件进行评估,有利于提高我国学术期刊的被引用、被检索的概率,并使学术期刊的网上策划选题与组稿成为可能.     

析体育理论课程测验的质量指标

根据教育统计学讨论了评价体育专业学生理论课程测验的四个质量指标。这些指标都可以通过统计的方法加以量化，有了这些指标，就可以比较客观地反映教育测验的质量。     

从对蹬冰加速理论的质疑点看克莱普冰刀的设计构想

从对蹬冰加速理论的质疑点角度，探讨了克莱普冰刀的设计构想。结果表明，克莱普冰刀的设计思想不仅仅是延长了蹬冰时间、提高了踩关节的灵活性、加大了蹬冰腿膝关节的伸展范围、保持了城关节的平稳移动，更重要的意义在于揭示重心沿滑行方向上的前移作用。它改变了以往人们对加速理论中，只有在与滑行方向水平面内相垂直的蹬冰力才对加速起贡献作用的传统认识，暗示出在滑行方向上切向和法向速度均对重心的加速起作用的观点。     

运用多元决策数学模型评价体育实验教学质量的研究

立足于体育实验教学实际，通过查阅文献资料、专家咨询调查等方法，并借鉴已有的教学评价经验，运用模糊数学原理和统计学理论，构建出体育实验教学质量评价指标体系和方法体系。它对于加强实验教学管理，促进实验教学质量的提高具有重要的实际意义。