论詹姆士的重效果思想与中国传统的重名思想

姆士提出,实用主义方法是一种确定方向的态度,它不是看最先的原则、范畴,而是看最后的效果和事实。这种重效果思想对于冲击中国传统的重名轻效果的思维方式对人们的束缚具有重要意义。儒家的重名轻效果、重义轻利的思想导致了中国社会停滞落后。这种思维方式也是我们党犯“左”的错误的重要思想根源之一。实事求是的实质是突破这种僵化的思维方式,重视实践效果,坚持在实践中检验和发展真理。     

Reviews

Buckingham, David Moving Images: Understanding Children's Emotional Responses to Television
Aldrich, Richard (ed) In History and in Education: Essays presented to Peter Gordon
Kohli, Wendy (ed) Critical Conversations in Philosophy of Education
Griffiths, Morwenna Feminisms and the Self: the web of identity
Fryer, Marilyn Creative Teaching and Learning
Atkinson, Paul; Davies, Brian and Delamont, Sara (eds) Discourse and Reproduction: Essays in Honour of Basil Bernstein
Slee, Roger Changing Theories and Practices of Discipline
Woods, Peter and Jeffrey, Bob Teachable Moments: The Art of Teaching in Primary Schools
Best, Ron (ed) Education, Spirituality and the Whole Child
Bassey, Michael Creating Education Through Research
Higham, Jeremy; Sharp, Paul and Yeomans, David The Emerging 16–19 Curriculum: Policy and Provision
Bruner, Jerome The Culture of Education
Halsall, Rob and Cockett, Mike (eds) Education and Training: Chaos or Coherence
McBride, Rob (ed) Teacher Education Policy
Wideen, Marvin F. and Grimmett, Peter P. (eds) Changing Times in Teacher Education
Nixon, Jon; Martin, Jane; McKeown, Penny and Ranson, Stewart Encouraging Learning: towards a theory of the learning school
Gewirtz, Sharon; Ball, Stephen, J. and Bowe, Richard Markets, Choice and Equity in Education     

分部积分中u的选择

在高等数学的教学中,很多学生对分部积分法求积分感到很困难,其关键是不能恰当地选择分部积分法公式中的“u“和“dv“.笔者根据多年教学和解题经验,总结出分部积分中“u“的选择方法.     

雅俗制衡与中国文学的价值重建

19世纪末到20世纪30年代是中国文化系统发生根本性变革、文学被重新定义的年代。这一时期，文学的雅俗碰撞尤为激烈，雅俗内涵变化尤为频繁。从《新小说》到《玉梨集》，从《小说月报》到《礼拜六》，从京派到海派，每一次文学雅俗身份的重新确认，都是文学对自身的一次再定义，是该时期文学价值重建的一种方式。正是这种雅俗制衡，构成该时期中国文学的阶段性演进。     

The Centros Concertados in Spain, Parental Demand and Implications for Equity

In Spain, the exercise of choice by parents of a suitable school for their children is not practised by all families in the same way. The evidence shows that an increasing social polarisation and a substantial disequilibrium in schooling are taking place in compulsory education. There is a high concentration of immigrant students in public schools in contrast with what happened in the centros concertados (private schools with public funding). This situation is especially unbalanced in some Autonomous Communities, such as the Community of Madrid, Catalonia, Valencia and Andalusia. The inequalities in the distribution of students in the network of public schools and private schools financed by public funds are producing significant responses from parents, teachers, experts, and also from other social groups. Some of the proposals made by different experts and by the Spanish Ministry of Education are analysed in order to reach to a quality education in more equitable conditions for all students.     

Certainty of Punishment and Criminal Thinking: Do the Rational and Non-rational Parameters of a Student’s Decision to Cheat on an Exam Interact?

The purpose of this study was to determine whether criminal thinking interacts with the rational requirements of human decision-making in a group of college students. A convenience sample of 315 undergraduates (114 males, 201 females) completed self-report measures of criminal thinking and estimated their likelihood of cheating on an exam given different levels of certainty of apprehension. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance revealed that students were significantly more likely to seize on the opportunity to cheat when the certainty of getting caught was 10% than when it was 50% and that students with higher levels of criminal thinking were more likely to take the opportunity to cheat than students with lower levels of criminal thinking. In addition, students exhibiting moderate proactive criminal thinking and moderate to high reactive criminal thinking were significantly less likely to be deterred from cheating when the odds of getting caught were low.     

研究性课程目标的价值选择与观念误区

研究性课程作为一种新的课程形态，既涉及到课程目标的取向。又涉及到课程目标的价值选择，因此，准确定位研究性课程的目标，正确作出课程目标的价值选择。克服研究性课程在开发与实施中的各种观念误区，是当前乃至今后中小学研究性课程开发与实施的首要前提。     

大学组织社会使命的理性选择

大学作为一种独特的社会组织,必须承担一定的历史责任与社会使命。大学的使命与其它社会组织使命一样通过组织的宗旨,理想、精神与实践具体表现。不同的时代有不同的政治、经济、文化发展需要,不同的社会利益集团对大学的要求也有很大差异。面对现代社会复杂多样的需求,大学应该如何回应?有适应才有生存,有批判才有引领,大学必须谨慎地回答,理性地选择。     

大鼠左心室流出道电生理特性的观察

目的为了观察大鼠左心室流出道组织是否具有自动节律性.方法利用细胞内微电极记录技术,观察了18例大鼠左心室流出道组织的电生理特征.结果16例(88.89%)出现了自律性电活动,并且可在局部组织记录到典型的慢反应动作电位.结论大鼠左心室流出道组织具有自律性.其生理功能有待进一步研究.     

The Impact of an SES-Based Model on a College's Undergraduate Admissions Outcomes

In Grutter vs. Bollinger, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the use of race as one factor, among many in admissions decisions is constitutional. It is not known, however, whether future legal opinions will continue to uphold the use of affirmative action policies. Some have argued that class-based preferences can achieve many of the same goals as in affirmative action while being more likely to withstand legal challenges. To date, no empirical studies have been conducted on the potential impact of a class-based admissions policy if implemented at an undergraduate institution. This paper reports on a study at a selective public college and compares a number of outcomes under three admissions models: the original admissions decisions, a purely academic model, and an socio-economic status (SES)-based model. The findings showed that use of the SES-based model would have led to a more academically qualified class than in the original admitted class while maintaining substantially greater student diversity that was found under the academic model. An admissions policy based on preferences for socio-economically disadvantaged applicants appears to hold promise for other colleges and universities with similar institutional and applicant characteristics. The ideas and research design reported in this paper are based on the doctoral dissertation study of the second author, Undergraduate Admissions Models Incorporating Socioeconomic Factors (Johnson, 2000).