从参与状况看高校女教师的进取意识

本以1980－1999年“中国教育事业统计年鉴”中有关数据为基础,结合中加合作国际课题组,武汉大学妇女研究中心等组织对高校女教师的现状调查数据,通过分析认为高校女教师参与状况不佳的原因在于进取意识的薄弱,提出要使高校女教师充分参与高等教育,必须培养女性主体意识,树立进取意识。     

大学生社会主义荣辱观教育要正确处理的几个关系

对大学生进行社会主义荣辱观教育必须正确处理以下五个方面的关系:一是大力弘扬与精心培育的关系,二是理论辩伪与实践体验的关系,三是正面典型引导与反面案例启迪的关系,四是教师以身作则与严格要求学生的关系,五是价值导向与制度安排的关系。     

对我国高校一些办学误区的分析及思考

近几年来,伴随着高等教育的不断扩招和升级,在实际运行过程中暴露出许多深层次的问题,出现一些办学误区。本文拟从对高校办学误区存在的现象及认识原因进行分析,对我国高校今后的发展进行了一些思考。     

从招生透析海淀走读大学的可持续发展

文章分析了海淀走读大学招生工作在学校可持续发展中的重要作用。     

电大财经专业的教育改革和发展思考

电大财经专业教育是利用现代远程教育手段，培养面向基层、从事财经实际工作的应用型人才。发展电大财经专业教育，必须适应现代经济发展的需要，转变观念，深化教学改革，抓好教学资源建设，强化和完善教学过程的管理。     

关于21世纪高校图书馆重新定位的思考

长期以来，高校图书馆一直被定位于教学辅助部门，随着高等教育内涵的转变，学生学习方式的转变，图书馆馆员角色的转变，图书馆的教育职能越来越显突出，高校图书馆的地位有待重新定位。     

关于加强高校领导干部权力监督与制约的思考

本文结合高校实际,提出从权力配置、制度、法规、权利、道德、舆论这六个方面监督和制约高校领导干部的权力.     

边疆地区高校经济困难生心理健康及人格特点的调查分析

贫困大学生的心理健康问题备受关注，引起了大量的相关研究。由于地缘的差异性，贫困生心理问题体现出多样性特点。该文使用症状自评量表（SCL-90）和大学生现实感量表（艾森克现实性-幻想性测验）对滇南边疆民族地区两高校762名经济困难大学生进行团体测查，分析表明他们的心理健康水平较全国青年常模低，存在性别和经济状况等差异，其人格特质倾向于现实性，其中与他们的心理健康有因果关系的人格特征有实际性、男子气-女子气、攻击性和自信力。因此在对他们进行心理解困时，应有系统观理念，认知优化意识和“问题中心”的策略。     

对大学生就业两大主体的几点思考

本对大学生就业中的两大主体因素－－高校与毕业生在示职择业中扮演的不同角色、地位和作用分别进行了剖析提出了一些应用性的见解，力求对大学生就业指导和大学生求职择业有一定裨益。     

The scholarship of teaching: A comparison of conceptions held by experts and regular academic staff

Over the past decade the scholarship ofteaching has received considerable attention inthe higher education literature as a reactionto the widely cited Carnegie Foundation'sreport ``Scholarship Reconsidered'; however, theconcept has remained devoid of a unifieddefinition. A recent Delphi study conductedwith a selective group of scholars whoseexpertise lies in the area of universityteaching and learning indicated the extent towhich these ``experts' agreed with each other onimportant features and unresolved issues theyassociate with the scholarship of teaching. Building on the results of the Delphi study,the present article discusses the results of asecond survey comparing these ``experts' 'conceptions with those of a larger group ofscholars whose expertise lies in a differentacademic field (``regular academic staff'), inorder to identify the similarities anddifferences in the conceptions of thescholarship of teaching held by each of the twogroups. While regular academic staff werefound to associate the scholarship of teachingmore with good or effectiveteaching ``experts' pointed to notions such aspeer review and scholarly standards. Thediscussion of the results focuses on the notionof consensus reached within and betweenthe two groups. It is argued that in order topromote changes in policy with respect to whatis to count as scholarship, identifying andreporting ``experts' ' conceptions, thoughclearly necessary for promoting moreenlightened discussions on the issue, willremain insufficient. Policy change in academeis more likely to ensue as a result of thewider academic community reaching consensus onthe meaning, and nature, of the scholarship ofteaching. The wider academic community includes``experts', as well as colleagues in departmentsand disciplinary associations. The articleconcludes by exploring the notion of consensusthrough the lens of critical social theory.