高校图书馆借阅情况的统计与分析

本文利用数理统计的方法,对常熟理工学院图书馆借阅情况进行了统计与分析,就如何制定藏书规划、进行图书宣传、及时剔旧图书等问题,提出了建设性的意见。     

论数字馆藏的评价

本文首先对数字馆藏的概念及构成重新作了分析,指出数字馆藏评价包括对馆藏数字资源和数字资源存储系统的评价,而对馆藏数字资源的评价又包括对数据库、网络资源导航和其它数字化文献的评价。进而对数字馆藏存储系统的评价进行了系统的论述。     

The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*

This article presents the concept of electronic record as articulated by the first phase of the InterPARES (International research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems) Project (1999–2001) and discusses it in light of the findings of the second phase of the Project (2002–2006). While InterPARES 1 focused on records produced and/or maintained in databases and document management systems, InterPARES 2 examined records produced and/or maintained in interactive, experiential and dynamic environments. The authors describe the characteristics of these environments and of the entities found in them in the course of case studies conducted on systems used for carrying out artistic, scientific and e-government activities, and propose the new concept of record that InterPARES 2 is eleborating, which expands on that formulated by InterPARES 1.The authors would like to thank InterPARES 2 research assistant Randy Preston for his careful editing and constructive criticisms. Some of his suggestions have been incorporated in the text of this article.     

谈加强档案保存价值鉴定工作的若干问题

章从档案工作的现实需要出发，针对档案保存价值鉴定及保管期限的确定，通过具体案例，说明其重要性与必要性，深入研究其原则与方法，同时呼吁档案人士应重视各种各类档案的保存价值和保管期限的研究，引进“必要件”概念建立“必要档案”管理机制。     

以归档为契机的文件、档案一体化管理战略研究

归档既是电子件纳入档案管理范畴的最佳切入点，也是实现电子件管理流程重组、完善电子政务环境中件管理功能的关节点。本分析了在电子政务环境中如何以归档为契机实现件、档案一体化管理战略。     

Program Evaluation and Archives: An Essay on a Research Agenda

The author begins with comments on the importance and position of program evaluation (PE), mostly in the context of European archives. These observations, based on personal experience and on a preliminary literature review, show a definitive need for PE, despite its weak position in the managerial activities of archives. Next, the author highlights some special aspects of the evaluation of archival programs. Finally, the author draws conclusions from his general remarks and from his reading of the articles included in this thematic issue ofArchival Science. He outlines some tendencies and shifts in the definition and purposes of evaluation and a short research agenda, containing the most important issues for further development of PE in archives.     

Building an Infrastructure for Archival Research

This article chronicles the rapid expansion since 1990 of research within archival science and characterizes contemporary archival research culture. It examines the role and state of key factors that have led to the development of the existing research infrastructure, such as growth in doctoral education, forums for presenting and publishing research, the numbers and size of graduate archival education programs, availability of diverse funding for research, transdisciplinary and international research collaborations, and application of innovative research methods and tools appropriate for investigating increasingly complex and wide-ranging research questions. An Appendix articulates and names archival research methods, including those derived and adapted from other disciplines, with a view to adding to the “literary warrant” for archival research methods, promoting the rigorous application of research design and methods, and providing sources for the teaching of research methods for professional and research careers. The article concludes with recommendations about how to sustain and extend the emerging research front.     

谈档案工作"统一领导"与"分级管理"的合理结合

1987年，我国《档案法》明确规定：“档案工作实行统一领导，分级管理的原则”。距今已经十几年了，但在认识上和实践中，仍有不少人简单地将该原则等同于“集中统一管理”原则，片面强调“统一领导，分级管理”的核心和实质就是“集中统一管理”，似乎“集中统一”的程度越高，便显得越正确，越是坚持了原则。这种认识上的误区，直接导致了档案行政管理中统得过死，管得过多，片面性，一刀切，过度强调整齐划一，经常忽视因地制宜等诸多弊端。因此，在档案工作中，