图书馆学家的"八大品格"

文章列出了图书馆学家应该具备的八项条件 :知行结合的笃行者、鲜活知识的创造者、动态智慧的探索者、现实问题的发现者、学科体系的创立者、禁区盲区的拓荒者、陈规陋习的反叛者、长于理性的思辨者。     

论著作权限制--新著作权法解读思考

结合我国新著作权法的有关条款，从地域、时间、范围和权能等四个方面对著作权的限制作了阐述，并指出了著作权限制的原由和网络时代著作权限制面临的新问题。     

关于广东省高校图书馆网上信息服务的现状与分析

通过对广东省高校图书馆开展网上信息服务工作的现状进行网上调查, 分析了其特点及不足, 并提出了几点思考与展望。     

图书资料资产清查建库工作的组织与管理

山东农业大学近期对高校合并后，全校近百年来各个图书馆和院系资料室的所有图书资料进行了数据库建设和资产清查，实现了全部图书资料管理的现代化、规范化、科学化，为今后图书资料的优化配置和资源共享打下了基础。本文介绍了该校在图书资料数据库建设和资产清查中组织与管理工作的做法和措施。     

论客家研究与客家文献

客家民系是中华民族的一个重要分支，客家研究已有近200年的历史。为促进客家研究的全面深入开展，弘扬客家传统精神，应加强客家献的收集、整理和数字化建设。     

国家科学数字图书馆网络联合参考咨询服务质量控制及评价方案研究*

介绍了国内外数字参考咨询服务质量评价体系的研究与应用概况。结合国家科学数字图书馆网络联合数字参考咨询服务的质量控制需要，在项目一期建设基础上选取部分指标建立了实际操作的评价体系，并制定了制度化的系统评价方案。     

档案袋评价在教育中的运用

在我们的生活与工作中，做记录并使之归档不是什么新鲜事，但要把档案记录作为一种教育评价方法却足近十几年的事。     

基于核心素养的高中数学课程目标与学业评价

基于数学核心素养的课程目标制订,应当以"知识作为核心素养的生成本源"为逻辑线索,以"数学核心素养贯穿课程体系的整体支配模式"为框架,用体现目标水平的层次结构方式,兼顾学业评价的可操作性。对于数学核心素养,宜采用知识理解、知识迁移、知识创新三级水平刻画。知识理解指学生掌握基础知识、形成基本技能;知识迁移指学生将知识应用到新的情境中去解决问题的能力;知识创新指学生提出问题、推广问题的能力。这样划分数学核心素养水平,能反映数学课程目标的内核,具备学业质量测评的操作性特征。     

我的小学语文教育研究历程

历经多年的小学语文教改实验研究,在理论与实际相结合的基础上构建了"小学语文教学理论体系",形成了语文教育的基本观点:确定母语教育价值与定位;从语言学,解析"小学语文课程的性质、功能";从语文学科的性质,确定"语文教学发展语言能力、思维能力、思想、情感的发展目标";从汉字、汉语特点,"提升汉字教学的基本理论和方法";从语言学、文学及教学论,提出"读写教学的本真"以及"读写教学的基本原理和方法";从历史经验中,明确"我国的语文教育必须走中国的道路",要在继承传统语文教育基础上,吸取世界先进教学理论,发展我国的语文教育。     

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.