中职教师在职攻读硕士学位招生制度研究

对区域中职教师攻读硕士学位有关环节的调查显示，有关报名条件、考试科目、录取标准等内容需要进一步改进。建议：建立独立的培养体系与招生制度，放宽报考条件、改革考试内容，利用推荐、保送、择优降分、本科应届毕业生保送不直读、同等学力申请等形式，多渠道选拔优秀人才，弥补现行招生制度的不足。同时国家应建立“中职硕士”奖学金，并在考试时间、专业设置等方面考虑中职学校教师的现实需求。     

英国教师职前培养、入职培训和在职进修的一体化及其特征

本文探讨了英国教师职前培养、入职培训和在职进修的一体化及其基本特征 ,以期对我国当前建立教师职前培养、入职辅导和职后培训一体化的师资培养体系提供参考与借鉴。     

学习共同体研究热点知识图谱分析

为科学清晰地展现国内外学习共同体研究成果,以中国知网（CNKI）与科学引文数据库（WOS）为文献来源,运用 CiteSpace V 软件的关键词共现聚类分析、研究机构共现分析和关键词时区共现分析等方法绘制知识图谱。研究发现,国内外学习共同体研究前沿包括教师专业学习共同体、网络学习共同体以及实践共同体 3大主流方向。研究热点聚焦教师专业发展、项目教学、合作学习、情景学习、教学策略开发等理论。未来学习共同体将与深度学习、泛在学习、自组织等理论结合产生新的生长点,对教师专业发展和网络学习具有重要推动作用。     

Winning the Battle,Losing the War: Bilingual Teachers and Post-Proposition 227

The implementation of Proposition 227 has created chaos, uncertainty, and a hostile environment for bilingual education teachers. This study describes the experiences of 20 bilingual education teachers in Southern California. In in-depth interviews, teachers speak out about the challenges, frustrations, fears, and the increasing animosity they face on a daily basis, and how they resist and contest the language enforcer role in various ways. Out of the chaos that has been created by Proposition 227, these bilingual teachers have emerged as the language civil rights activists of the new millennium.     

提高小学教育专业本科生双语教学能力的思考

论述了对师范院校小学教育本科生进行有计划性、有针对性的培养的重要性,指出这是从根本上提高小学双语教学师资能力的重要途径。通过对培养形式的比较,以增设双语教学选修课的方式来培养小学双语师资,比较符合当前本科院校实际情况。在分析双语教师应具备的基本素质和双语教学目标的基础上,提出了培训方案。     

美国教师教育评估及对我国的借鉴和启示

20世纪80年代以来，教师教育的质量问题逐渐受到美国教育界的关注。美国的教师教育评估主要从两个方面进行：即教师教育机构认证和对教师教育毕业生的追踪评价。通过对美国教师教育评估的相关问题进行梳理，以期引起我国对教师教育质量的重视并对其提供借鉴．以引导教育界关注教师教育改革的效果并进行教师教育质量评估。     

Teaching imaginary children: University students’ narratives about their Latino practicum children

This study investigates the dialogic processes involved in how teachers talk about their students and what consequences their ways of talking (i.e., “narratives”) may have for their guidance. We take a sociocultural perspective on learning as transformation of students’ subjectivity. Teaching, as a process of guiding and facilitating learning, cannot be effective if the teacher does not actively seek how the student perceives and understands reality. We borrow and adapt from Bakhtin (1999) four narrative ways of talking about others: objectivizing, subjectivizing, problematizing and finalizing. The presence of these narratives in web discussion postings of our pre-service teachers about the Latino children they worked with in a community center are analyzed. We then compare their ways of talking about children with print- and web-based discussions about children made by in-service teachers, model teachers and our pre-service teachers in a school-based practicum. Using mixed quantitative and qualitative methodologies, we found an overwhelming predominance of objectivizing and finalizing in our pre-service teachers’ narratives about the children with whom they work that seems to define a certain pedagogical regime that we call here “teaching imaginary children/students.” This “way of talking” about children seems to be characterized by unchecked speculations guiding instruction that are not tested by finding out from the children themselves how they understand the instruction and the world. These speculations, in turn, can lead to a dogmatic approach towards children.     

Does Fidelity of Implementation Account for Changes in Teacher–Child Interactions in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Banking Time?

This study examined fidelity of implementation in a randomized trial of Banking Time, a classroom-based intervention intended to improve children's behavior, specifically for those at risk for developing externalizing behavior problems, through improving the quality of teacher–child interactions. The study sample comes from a randomized controlled trial that took place over three years and included 183 teachers and 470 preschool children recruited across three sites. Results exploring fidelity of implementation indicated that Banking Time practices were present across treatment and nontreatment groups. In addition, the presence of more Positive Banking Time Practices accounted for improvements in teacher–child interactions while Restricted Banking Time Practices showed inconsistent patterns, relating both to positive and negative teacher–child interactions. Further, random assignment to Banking Time resulted in the presence of more Positive Banking Time Practices and fewer Restricted Banking Time Practices, which accounted for the improved teacher–child interactions. Thus, findings point to the critical need to better account for intervention fidelity across conditions in randomized trials, allowing for better understanding of the mechanism through which interventions lead to intended outcomes.     

Agonistic democracy and passionate professional development in teacher-leaders

Politicians and policy-makers in education routinely proclaim the centrality of schools and teachers in sustaining and consolidating democracy and democratic society. This article offers an account of teachers engaged in research in their schools and classrooms, with peers and students, so as to highlight the democratic potential of this engagement. In order to do so, it draws on an agonistic account of democracy that is distinct from more familiar liberal or procedural versions. Such an account is characterised by an emphasis on the values of constitutive pluralism, robust contestation and enduring tragedy, where the latter entails recognition of the ineliminable nature of (political) conflict and the inevitability of loss in human life. The teachers involved in this research demonstrated capacities which, it is argued, reflect an agonistic democratic ethos, including: developing the confidence to assume intellectual leadership by asking questions and eliciting and engaging plural perspectives in relation to these questions; engagement in the cut and thrust of research without the expectation of finding any final or perfect solutions; and an acceptance of difference and disagreement as constitutive and constructive elements in rethinking areas of policy and practice. Developing and encouraging these capacities, it is argued, is important in an increasingly authoritarian policy context that threatens the vital links between democracy and education highlighted by Dewey a century ago.     

新时期高校教师道德建设探讨

高校是培养高素质劳动者、建设者、接班人的重要阵地，高校教师的道德建设对整个社会的道德建设有着影响、示范和辐射的作用。我们应当坚持并贯彻“以德治国”的战略思想，抓住当前有利时机，采取各种措施。通过多种途径，切实加强高校教师的道德建设，确保高校教书育人工作健康有序地进行。