试论古代汉语教学媒体的选择依据

为了在古代汉语教学中达到良好而显著的教学效果，从教学媒体的个别特性和教学要素两方面介绍古代汉语教学媒体选择的基本依据。     

在中学历史学科中强化史料证据意识教育

中学历史二期课程改革特别强调学生的探究学习能力，而在历史探究学习方面，拥有史料证据意识无论从历史学本身的要求还是从当代历史教育的培养目标来说都是不可缺少的，但中学历史学科学生史料证据意识方面存在一定的问题，如忽视史料证据来源和可靠性、缺乏甄别运用史料证据的能力。因此要重视对学生的史料证据意识教育，文章对此提出了一些相关策略。     

污点证人的罪行豁免与证据使用豁免

引进污点证人作证豁免制度在学界已达成共识,但究竟是实行罪行豁免还是证据使用豁免却有争论。通过分析这两种豁免形式的利弊,并结合中国国情,提出中国宜采用有限的罪行豁免的主张。     

屈原的教育和人才思想及其当代意义

~~屈原的教育和人才思想及其当代意义@陈学文$湘南学院中文系!湖南郴州423000~~~~     

电子合同成立的地点与时间及其法律效力研究

电子合同作为现代信息技术发展下一种新的商业活动形式，与传统合同相比有着不同的特殊点。它利用现代信息技术改变了传统的贸易观念和方式，同时也引发了诸多新的法律问题，使传统的法律制度尤其是合同制度面临严峻的挑战。本文从电子合同的含义和特征出发，对电子合同成立时间、地点的确定及其法律效力的确认问题作了初步探讨。     

当事人陈述探微

当事人陈述具有两种涵义，其一为当事人基于诉讼主体地位向法院所作的陈述，其二为当事人基于证据方法之地位向法院所作的陈述。前者为意的表示，性质上属于观念通知，后者为知的表示，性质上属于事实行为。由于两种当事人陈述涵义、功能及性质有别，故应适用不同的制度予以调整。     

我国刑法解释存在的若干问题

我国二十多年的刑法解释实践存在一个严重问题：宪法和法律的规定不能适用于刑法解释实践，本应由刑法规定的犯罪问题和刑罚问题，却由司法解释替代了，刑法赖以支撑的罪刑法定原则在司法解释中成为一纸空，刑法作为国家重要基本法的统一性和权威性受到严峻挑战。本就上述现象和问题，进行了分析和评述。     

Epistemic Foundation for Teaching Critical Thinking in Group Discussion

I argue for a view of critical thinking and learning as a fallibilistic epistemic process of inquiry and evaluation, which is grounded in human fallibility. I show how this plausible view is different from other views, in that it is predicated not only on individual thinking alone but also on group thinking as it affects the individual in the context of a group discussion. The individualistic rational view of critical thinking only specifies the process or method that one may individually use to evaluate beliefs or the evidence that one brings to bear on one's doxastic attitude or judgment. This view does not specify the nature and scope of evidence that one may need to evaluate. I argue that evaluating a belief in the context of having a substantial amount of available evidence in a social group is important for determining whether one thinks critically. There is epistemic advantage in evaluating a broad scope of available evidence in a group discussion, which does not exist otherwise. I assume that group discussion is a pedagogical tool, which under the right social conditions, is likely to bring about learning and the acquisition of critical thinking abilities. The right social conditions for group discussion can optimize reasonableness by a process which involves cognitive division of labor and epistemic prudence. An individual can evaluate on his or her own only a limited amount of evidence; sometimes we may need to rely on the evidence that others have already evaluated which they may reasonably accept, given their cognitive comparative advantage. I distinguish among three plausible learning outcomes of the process of critical thinking, which indicate cognitive division of labor and comparative epistemic advantage in a group discussion.     

逮捕条件的述评

1997年7月1日起施行的经过修正的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第六十条对原逮捕的规定作了修改，逮捕的条件有所变化。从分析修改逮捕条件的原因，揭示逮捕条件的含义以及对逮捕条件中几个关键词的理解三个方面，逐一加以评述，对理解新的逮捕条件和执行逮捕，具有现实意义。