“图书馆学概论”课程思政元素体系构建

[目的/意义] 在课程思政教育改革背景下,构建"图书馆学概论"课程思政元素体系,能够进一步提升图书馆学课程德育价值,将立德树人根本任务落到实处。[方法/过程] 采用内容分析法和访谈法获取"图书馆学概论"课程中蕴含思政内容的数据资料,借助NVivo12软件对数据资料进行编码和分析,提炼"图书馆学概论"课程思政元素。对初步研究结果进行两次专家访谈,基于专家意见构建"图书馆学概论"课程思政元素体系。[结果/结论] "图书馆学概论"课程思政元素体系主要包括理想信念、品德修养、专业精神、个人发展4个一级元素,政治认同、国家认同等15个二级元素,以及道路认同、理论认同等35个三级元素。     

“互联网+”背景下学前儿童家长成长教育课程资源的建设现状与改善策略探讨

0-6岁学前儿童家长学习意愿强,手机操作和互联网使用熟练,建设科学合理系统的学前儿童家长成长课程资源将有利于提升家庭教育质量。结合互联网+平台数据分析可知,现有的0-6岁学前儿童家长互联网成长平台多为企业搭建,以盈利为主要目的,提供优质用户体验为特色,但教育课程资源呈现不专业、不系统,公益性不足,成长性不够的特点。建议政府和教育部门应加强家长成长教育课程资源平台的质量和迭代的监控,加强优质国外家庭教育资源的译介,加强企业和非企业优势互补的合作,加强关注家长自身成长的教育课程资源建设。     

高校图书馆办公室人员的素质要求及其培养

基于高校图书馆办公室人员的素质要求，文章分析了当前高校图书馆办公室人员素质方面存在的问题，提出了有效提升图书馆办公室人员素质的主要途径。     

数字图书馆用户信息库的建设

用户信息资源是数字图书馆整体信息资源的有机组成部分,只有建设完善的用户信息库,才可以保证数字图书馆进行高效的信息服务。在用户信息库中应包含关键词、主题及用户的个人情况、用户的特定信息需求和信息行为描述等内容。建库的方法有直接法和间接法两种。表3。参考文献3。     

与学习进阶相适宜的科学探究课程方案述评

美国的科学探究课程IQWST提供了把科学探究学习进阶理论转化到教学实践的有效方式。其开发理念为:依据学习进阶框架确定课程目标,以"驱动问题"为线索设计、组织课程内容,强调科学知识和科学实践能力共同进阶。这启发我们在落实以"核心素养"为目标的课程改革中要注重知识的部分与整体的联系,课程中合理设置科学实践活动,做好科学探究课程与传统课程的结合。     

基于OBE理念,构建通识教育课程教学与评估体系——以清华大学为例

国内高校积极探索实现通识教育的路径已有多年,但其效果在一定程度上仍然受到质疑。课程是实现通识教育的主要载体,清华大学在探索构建通识教育课程体系过程中,尝试性地采用了工科教育中广泛使用的成效基准教育理念与能力导向课程设计来分析当前我国大学通识教育的课程建设,指出通识教育众课程与通识教育目标之间欠缺逻辑对应的普遍性问题。本文重点介绍了清华大学通识教育课程建设中的困惑和设想,探讨了如何锚定与对应课程与能力目标之间的逻辑关系。本文建议高校在通识教育初建阶段将引入OBE框架以及能力导向课程设计理念可作为一种选择,此举有助于厘清大学通识教育在本科教育中的定位与通识课程之间的逻辑和结构关系。     

新课改背景下教师权威的消解与重构

随着新课程改革的不断推进，教师权威受到严峻的挑战。教师权威的存在是客观且有其合理性的。新课程消解了教师的知识权威、传统权威和法定权威。重建教师权威，需要从转换教师角色、改善知能结构、完善人格等几个方面着手。     

Suggestions for the "Integration in Multiple Certificates" Curriculum System Construction

Business English professional "Integration in Multiple Certificates" refers to these two kinds of certificates——a diploma and vocational certificates. Business English curriculum design unified vocational qualification certificate with professional training objectives. Basis on the meeting of requirements of certificates for graduation, making professional training contents, curriculum,teaching methods together with vocational training and the requirements of professional qualification certificates.     

Finding the common ground: Teachers' and employers' representations of English in an assessment context

There has been a long‐standing debate about how ‘English’ can be defined. Educational policy changes have typically been driven by differing representations of the subject, and have ranged from broad ‘aesthetic’ definitions to more narrow ‘functional’ views. The present study aims to analyse areas of consensus and contention in stakeholders' discourse regarding English. A questionnaire‐based survey and focus groups were used to explore how teachers and employers viewed English as a subject. Their views were conceptualised into three themes: the importance of functional English; English as atomistic versus holistic study; and English as critical thought. These themes are discussed in relation to historical definitions of ‘English’, and their implications for the future reform of English qualifications.     

Six into One: The Contradictory Art School Curriculum and how it Came About

This article reports historical research which sought to understand the present‐day post‐secondary art curriculum through analysing its history in terms of changes in conceptions of art. It found that there have been six distinctive curricula: Apprentice, Academic, Formalist, Expressive, Conceptual and Professional. As a new curriculum has been introduced, it has co‐existed with much contained in a previous one. Most of the curriculum changes have taken place in the past 65 years. During this time, there has been a massive expansion in the education of artists and at the same time art schools accommodated first modernism and then post‐Duchampian aesthetics. A conclusion is that this has made for a very crowded curriculum. Moreover, despite there being an ever increasing choice of things a student might learn, it appears that there is nothing which all students have to learn. It can be problematic that one part of the curriculum is in contradiction to another part, and moreover this lack of a core raises fundamental, ontological questions about what art as a discipline is.