How to encourage a lifelong learner? The complex relation between learning strategies and assessment in a medical curriculum

Abstract

To foster lifelong learning skills, we need new didactic approaches with aligned assessment methods. Therefore, we investigated whether the outcomes of a project assignment show a different relation to learning strategies than a longitudinal knowledge-based assessment. We studied learning strategies of first year students of medicine and biomedical sciences (n?=?248) and performed hierarchical regression analyses for the learning strategies and grades of the longitudinal knowledge-based test and project assignment. Scores of students, measured with the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Likert scale 1–7), were relatively low for critical thinking (3.53), compared to rehearsal (4.40), elaboration (4.82), organisation (4.69) and metacognitive self-regulation (4.33). Knowledge based tests showed a significant relation to elaboration (p?<?0.01). For the project-based assessment, we did not find a significant relation to any learning strategy (p?=?0.074). Explained variance of the grades was low for all learning strategies (R² < 0.043). Different types of assessment did not discriminate between students with high or low scores on learning strategies associated with lifelong learning. An explanation is that the curriculum is not aligned with assessment, or students do not benefit in terms of grades. We conclude that, if assessment is to drive lifelong learning skills, this is not self-evident.     

大学图书馆的绩效评估

文章简要介绍了绩效评估的基本方法,指出大学图书馆实行绩效评估是时代发展的需要,是引入竞争机制的具体体现。文章强调大学图书馆工作的绩效评估要以“工作规范为基础”,要引入等级记分法,用等级和分数来代替评语,要赋予每一项考核内容明确的数量值,以使评估人员在操作过程中便于检查、统计、比较。     

评估——高职院校改革与发展的助推器

高职高专院校人才培养工作水平评估,是我国高职教育改革与发展的内在要求,是政府依法行政、学校依法办学的重要举措.从实践效果看,评估有力地促进了学校教育教学观念的转变,办学思路的清晰,办学条件的改善,教学改革的深化,师资队伍的加强和教育管理的规范,实现了学校更好更快的发展.要巩固发展评估的成果,必须高度重视评估的整改工作,建立起评估的长效机制,不断推进高职院校的发展.     

英国GCSE化学考试探究性技能评价方法及启示

科学探究性技能的评价是英国GCSE化学课程考试评价目标中重要的一项.它对探究性技能进行分领域评价,制定详细的、便于操作的评价目标和评定细则,突出课程作业在评价中的地位,重视学生的探究过程和关注学生发展,其做法值得我国借鉴.     

中华文化最高价值视野中的学习评价思路

文化是研究学习评价的一个重要角度。中华文化的最高价值是＂崇高＂。在中华文化经历了漫长而复杂的变迁之后,崇高这一最高价值仍有必要而且值得传递,但需要更新。体现中华文化最高价值之传递与更新的学习评价思路包括：学习评价要全面地评估学习者的素质,学习评价要充分地促进学习,要提高学习评价本身的崇高性。     

发展性课程观:课程价值取向的必然选择

发展性课程观是在批判传统课程中根深蒂固的且至今仍存在于现实课程活动中的观念和行为以及人与课程之时代发展走向的基础上提出的,是课程观转型的时代主题。发展性课程观以马克思的人类解放理论为理论依据,它的核心是教化个体与改良社会,而教化的目的在于促进个体的全面发展与个性化成长,进而促成社会发展。构筑发展性课程观的互动、共生及再造的实践机制,廓清其运演的机理,激发个体的生命自觉,构筑和谐的课程生态,实现个体生命的超越,这是课程价值取向及人的发展的必然选择。     

实践教学的重新认识与学习评价方法研究

围绕应用型人才的培养目标和能力为本的课程目标,传统的课程模式应该转变为实践导向的课程模式。实践教学课程的设计和实施需要新型的学习评价策略与此相匹配,其最终目的是实现师生的共同成长和发展。     

普及学前教育政策的国际发展趋势述评

基于对学前教育多元价值的认同,世界范围内的入园率近年呈现上升趋势,各国普遍将政策关注点和资源聚焦在学前最后一年,通过国际倡议、国家行动计划以及立法等方式推进学前教育普及,将提高处境不利学前儿童入园机会作为实现普及学前教育目标的突破瓶颈,通过建立以政府为主体的多元化学前教育服务体系,以多种方式协调学前教育服务体系快速扩容和质量保证之间的平衡。借鉴国际社会相关政策制定和执行的经验与教训,中国需要从科学制定分步走的入园率目标、以政府为主体的多元资金投入模式以及针对处境不利儿童的重点干预政策等方面制定立足国情的普及学前教育政策。     

Trends and practices in functional behavior assessments completed by school psychologists

Functional Behavior Assessments (FBAs) utilize direct and indirect methods to collect data on student behavior to generate a functional hypothesis and drive intervention development. School psychologists are trained to conduct FBAs and use them regularly in schools. However, no evidence exists describing the specific practices used by school psychologists when they conduct FBAs. In this study, 199 respondents completed a web‐based survey developed using expert review and cognitive pretesting. Most respondents reported their gender as female (87%), were between 30 and 39 years old (50%), and practiced at the Specialist level (57%). Respondents reported receiving training in FBA across multiple sources and utilizing multi‐method data collection methods when conducting FBAs. A large amount of variability was observed in the specific instruments used by school psychologists, with a substantial proportion using forms that were not standardized or pre‐constructed. Implications for current practitioners, trainers, and researchers are described.     

Examining the ethical environment in higher education

Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) across the world have found themselves faced with new challenges on issues of ethics. Much of this has been centred on issues of assessment: plagiarism, buying essays, sharing/lending of previously passed work and the stealing of marked/returned work of others. Institutions still treat academic misconduct as largely a behavioural difficulty rather than an issue of ethics (or education), suggesting that academia places a far greater emphasis on combating new forms of dishonesty than it does on encouraging ethical habits and a healthy ethical environment. To date, the majority of research in this area has examined these forms of academic misconduct from the point of view of the student and/or the university, with the perspective of academics receiving very limited attention. Our hypothesis is that academics are perhaps best placed to provide the education needed to create and sustain an ethical environment, and we argue that being ‘ethically aware’ is a critical factor in the development of academic competence for all parties. This study adds to existing research in three ways: firstly, by highlighting the importance of an overall framework for an ethical environment within HEIs; secondly, by suggesting an ecological model of key parties (the university, students and academics) with responsibility for this environment in assessment; and thirdly, by including new evidence (generated by a survey of academics) to extend our understanding of their views on these issues.