高校体育教师教学监控能力的培养

采用角色改变技术、教学反馈技术和现场指导技术3种方法做为干预手段，探讨了干预条件下高校体育教师教学监控能力的提高与学生学科能力发展之间的关系。经过一个学年的干预训练，结果表明：(1)角色改变技术、教学反馈技术和现场指导技术做为3种干预手段，能明显地促进高校体育教师教学监控能力发展；(2)高校体育教师教学监控能力的发展，会促进其教学认知水平的提高和教学行为的改善；(3)高校体育教师教学监控能力的发展有利于促进学生学科能力的发展，提高学生的学业成绩。     

大学英语教学提问设计及信息反馈处理

课堂提问是英语教学中教师引导学生自主学习、实践语言交际的重要手段。本文反思了英语教学中出现的课堂提问设计与信息反馈处理中存在的不足，并在反思的基础上提出改进建议。     

高校大面积基础课程教师同行评教研究

前期已经建立了我校同行评教方案,本文主要针对已制定评教方案,从大面积基础课程着手,试行网上同行评教,对评教结果进行分析,找出问题症结所在,给出解决方案。     

高等教育学生评估教师教学的研究

20世纪上半叶,美国已有一些学校采用学生评估教师教学的政策,至今已在全世界的大学里被广泛地采用,但研究显示,只用学生回馈不足以作为判断教学的依据,教学评估系统尚有其它多种途径,才能构成完善和系统的程序。东方社会尊师重道的精神已受到学生评估教师教学的冲击,在一些地区开始造成损害。     

外科学考试初探

外科学考试仅是一种手段，其真正的目的是检测学生的理论水平和动手能力，通过考试所获得的反馈信息来促进外科学教学改革，进一步提高教学质量，为此，外科教师在进行外科教学改革的同时，必须重视外科学考试的研究，本作就外科学考试 模式，内容，方法，命题及外科学考试的结果分析等进行了初步的探讨，并提出了自己的观点。     

‘That happened to me too’: young people’s informal knowledge of diverse genders and sexualities

Abstract

This paper explores how young people of diverse genders and sexualities share information about sex, sexualities and genders. Formal approaches to education often fail to consider young people’s communication and information exchange practices, including the circulation of peer knowledge through social media. In the wake of recent Australian backlash against the Safe Schools Coalition, we can observe how homophobia and queerphobia in the broader community can impact upon young peoples’ ability to learn about themselves and their bodies through formal education. Yet young people of diverse genders and sexualities can be observed to support each other in peer spaces, utilising their knowledge networks. This paper explores young people’s informal learning practices, the capacity of peer networks to support and educate young people, and the challenges of recognising such networks in a culture in which health and education discourses present them as ‘risk subjects’ rather than ‘health agents’. These issues are discussed in relation to our own experiences in research and health promotion, including one author’s role as a youth peer educator. Drawing on our workplace experiences, we provide a number of anecdotal examples which highlight the complexities of informal knowledge practice and information circulation, and the ways these can challenge and reform professional health, education, and research approaches.     

英语口语教学浅论

口语教学应该以学生为中心,可以实行小组讨论法。教师对学生的口语错误要给予正确的指导与反馈,用测试方法检验学生,还要建立良好的师生关系。     

How Do Faculty Make Formative Use of Student Evaluation Feedback?: A Multiple Case Study

This multiple case study explored faculty formative use of student evaluation feedback. Results were based on interviews of ten education faculty members at a midwestern research university and reviews of relevant documents. It was found that end of semester student evaluation, originally used for summative evaluation, was also used by faculty for teaching improvement purposes. Faculty cared for student evaluation feedback and used discretion in using the feedback to improve their teaching. Faculty also experienced anxiety and tensions in the context of a mandated summative evaluation. Variations were found in faculty use of evaluation feedback, as a result of difference in background and experience.     

通过WWW进行教学的问题研究

对利用Web传递教学所面临的一些问题（Web连接速度、Web反应时间、教学材料的再处理以及数字化学习资料的提供）进行了分析研究。     

‘Trying to decide … what sort of teacher I wanted to be’: mentoring as a dialogic practice

Mentoring of pre-service teachers in school contexts is acknowledged as an important part of initial teacher education. However, finding sufficient school-based professional experience placements for pre-service teachers, ensuring the quality of the learning experiences provided by such placements, and gaining a clear understanding of what teachers actually learn during placements continue to be of concern to all involved in this component of teacher education. In this paper, three interconnected perspectives are provided as a university-based teacher educator, a school-based teacher educator and a pre-service teacher learn together in a dialogic mentoring relationship. The work of Mikhail Bakhtin and Valentin Voloshinov is employed to theorise the nature of dialogic relationships and how such relationships differ from ‘having a conversation’.